急性肾损伤预测模型作为临床决策支持系统的验证。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Giae Yun, Jinyeong Yi, Sangyub Han, Jihyeon Seong, Enver Menadjiev, Hyunkyung Han, Jaesik Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Sejoong Kim
{"title":"急性肾损伤预测模型作为临床决策支持系统的验证。","authors":"Giae Yun, Jinyeong Yi, Sangyub Han, Jihyeon Seong, Enver Menadjiev, Hyunkyung Han, Jaesik Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Sejoong Kim","doi":"10.23876/j.krcp.24.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical clinical condition that requires immediate intervention. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model called PRIME Solution to predict AKI and evaluated its ability to enhance clinicians' predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRIME Solution was developed using convolutional neural networks with residual blocks on 183,221 inpatient admissions from a tertiary hospital (2013-2017) and externally validated with 4,501 admissions at another tertiary hospital (2020-2021). To assess its application, we conducted a prospective evaluation using retrospectively collected data from 100 patients at the latter hospital, including 15 AKI cases. AKI prediction performance was compared among specialists, physicians, and medical students, both with and without AI assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without assistance, specialists demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.797), followed by medical students (0.619) and the PRIME Solution (0.568). AI assistance improved overall recall (61.0% to 74.0%) and F1 scores (38.7% to 42.0%), while reducing average review time (73.8 to 65.4 seconds, p < 0.001). However, the impact varied across expertise levels. Specialists showed the greatest improvement (recall, 32.1% to 64.3%; F1, 36.4% to 48.6%), whereas medical students' performance improved but aligned more closely with the AI model. Additionally, the effect of AI assistance varied by prediction outcome, showing greater improvement in recall for cases predicted as AKI, and better precision, F1 score, and review time reduction (73.4 to 62.1 seconds, p < 0.001) for cases predicted as non-AKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AKI predictions were enhanced by AI assistance, but the improvements varied according to the expertise of the user.</p>","PeriodicalId":17716,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an acute kidney injury prediction model as a clinical decision support system.\",\"authors\":\"Giae Yun, Jinyeong Yi, Sangyub Han, Jihyeon Seong, Enver Menadjiev, Hyunkyung Han, Jaesik Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Sejoong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.23876/j.krcp.24.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical clinical condition that requires immediate intervention. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model called PRIME Solution to predict AKI and evaluated its ability to enhance clinicians' predictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRIME Solution was developed using convolutional neural networks with residual blocks on 183,221 inpatient admissions from a tertiary hospital (2013-2017) and externally validated with 4,501 admissions at another tertiary hospital (2020-2021). To assess its application, we conducted a prospective evaluation using retrospectively collected data from 100 patients at the latter hospital, including 15 AKI cases. AKI prediction performance was compared among specialists, physicians, and medical students, both with and without AI assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without assistance, specialists demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.797), followed by medical students (0.619) and the PRIME Solution (0.568). AI assistance improved overall recall (61.0% to 74.0%) and F1 scores (38.7% to 42.0%), while reducing average review time (73.8 to 65.4 seconds, p < 0.001). However, the impact varied across expertise levels. Specialists showed the greatest improvement (recall, 32.1% to 64.3%; F1, 36.4% to 48.6%), whereas medical students' performance improved but aligned more closely with the AI model. Additionally, the effect of AI assistance varied by prediction outcome, showing greater improvement in recall for cases predicted as AKI, and better precision, F1 score, and review time reduction (73.4 to 62.1 seconds, p < 0.001) for cases predicted as non-AKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AKI predictions were enhanced by AI assistance, but the improvements varied according to the expertise of the user.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.24.163\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.24.163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)是一种需要立即干预的危重临床疾病。我们开发了一种名为PRIME Solution的人工智能(AI)模型来预测AKI,并评估其增强临床医生预测的能力。方法:利用带有残块的卷积神经网络对某三级医院2013-2017年收治的183221例住院患者进行开发,并对另一家三级医院2020-2021年收治的4501例住院患者进行外部验证。为了评估其应用,我们对后一家医院的100例患者进行了前瞻性评估,其中包括15例AKI病例。在有和没有人工智能帮助的情况下,比较专家、医生和医学生的AKI预测性能。结果:在没有辅助的情况下,专家的准确率最高(0.797),其次是医学生(0.619)和PRIME Solution(0.568)。人工智能辅助提高了整体召回率(61.0%到74.0%)和F1分数(38.7%到42.0%),同时减少了平均复习时间(73.8到65.4秒,p < 0.001)。然而,其影响因专业水平而异。专家表现出最大的改善(召回率从32.1%提高到64.3%;(F1, 36.4%至48.6%),而医学生的表现有所提高,但与人工智能模型更接近。此外,AI辅助的效果因预测结果而异,对于预测为AKI的病例,显示出更大的召回改善,对于预测为非AKI的病例,显示出更好的精度,F1评分和复习时间减少(73.4至62.1秒,p < 0.001)。结论:人工智能辅助增强了AKI预测,但改进程度因用户的专业知识而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of an acute kidney injury prediction model as a clinical decision support system.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical clinical condition that requires immediate intervention. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model called PRIME Solution to predict AKI and evaluated its ability to enhance clinicians' predictions.

Methods: The PRIME Solution was developed using convolutional neural networks with residual blocks on 183,221 inpatient admissions from a tertiary hospital (2013-2017) and externally validated with 4,501 admissions at another tertiary hospital (2020-2021). To assess its application, we conducted a prospective evaluation using retrospectively collected data from 100 patients at the latter hospital, including 15 AKI cases. AKI prediction performance was compared among specialists, physicians, and medical students, both with and without AI assistance.

Results: Without assistance, specialists demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.797), followed by medical students (0.619) and the PRIME Solution (0.568). AI assistance improved overall recall (61.0% to 74.0%) and F1 scores (38.7% to 42.0%), while reducing average review time (73.8 to 65.4 seconds, p < 0.001). However, the impact varied across expertise levels. Specialists showed the greatest improvement (recall, 32.1% to 64.3%; F1, 36.4% to 48.6%), whereas medical students' performance improved but aligned more closely with the AI model. Additionally, the effect of AI assistance varied by prediction outcome, showing greater improvement in recall for cases predicted as AKI, and better precision, F1 score, and review time reduction (73.4 to 62.1 seconds, p < 0.001) for cases predicted as non-AKI.

Conclusion: AKI predictions were enhanced by AI assistance, but the improvements varied according to the expertise of the user.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (formerly The Korean Journal of Nephrology; ISSN 1975-9460, launched in 1982), the official journal of the Korean Society of Nephrology, is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English. Its ISO abbreviation is Kidney Res Clin Pract. To provide an efficient venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to basic renal science and clinical practice, the journal offers open access (free submission and free access) and considers articles on all aspects of clinical nephrology and hypertension as well as related molecular genetics, anatomy, pathology, physiology, pharmacology, and immunology. In particular, the journal focuses on translational renal research that helps bridging laboratory discovery with the diagnosis and treatment of human kidney disease. Topics covered include basic science with possible clinical applicability and papers on the pathophysiological basis of disease processes of the kidney. Original researches from areas of intervention nephrology or dialysis access are also welcomed. Major article types considered for publication include original research and reviews on current topics of interest. Accepted manuscripts are granted free online open-access immediately after publication, which permits its users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles to facilitate access to a broad readership. Circulation number of print copies is 1,600.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信