Mattias Soop, Kajsa Anderin, Erik Syk, Jonas Nygren, Josefin Segelman
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2大流行期间区域冷场中心的结直肠癌手术:与大流行前的做法比较","authors":"Mattias Soop, Kajsa Anderin, Erik Syk, Jonas Nygren, Josefin Segelman","doi":"10.1002/jso.28094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stockholm, Sweden had among the highest excess mortality rates during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In March 2020, an entire hospital implemented an infection-free cold site infrastructure and scaled up imperative mainly colorectal cancer surgery, for the Stockholm health care region. The study evaluated the efficacy of the concept.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Strict preadmission screening and prophylactic interventions were implemented. The outcomes of the cold site cohort (30th March-21st June 2020) were compared to a prepandemic control. Population-based data on colorectal cancer patients were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 107 patients in the cold site cohort and 109 in the control cohort. None developed COVID-19 within 30 days postoperatively. The proportions of pelvic and laparoscopic surgery were similar. The cold site cohort had more potentially avoidable stomas (32/94 (34%) vs 19/91 (21%), p = 0.0442). In the region, the proportion of colorectal cancer resections at the cold site increased from prepandemic 12.9% (58 of 448) to 43.3% (94 of 217) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A SARS-CoV-2-cold site can be kept infection-free by screening, allowing increased volumes of colorectal cancer surgery with outcomes comparable to prepandemic practice. The cold site model should be more widely adopted in future similar scenarios.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This study reports on the implementation of an entire cold site hospital for imperative colorectal surgery, in particular colorectal cancer, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. By comparing outcomes to prepandemic practices, we demonstrated that the cold site hospital was effective in preventing infection and safely increasing surgical volume many-fold.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colorectal Cancer Surgery at a Regional Cold Site Centre During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Comparison With Prepandemic Practices.\",\"authors\":\"Mattias Soop, Kajsa Anderin, Erik Syk, Jonas Nygren, Josefin Segelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stockholm, Sweden had among the highest excess mortality rates during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In March 2020, an entire hospital implemented an infection-free cold site infrastructure and scaled up imperative mainly colorectal cancer surgery, for the Stockholm health care region. The study evaluated the efficacy of the concept.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Strict preadmission screening and prophylactic interventions were implemented. The outcomes of the cold site cohort (30th March-21st June 2020) were compared to a prepandemic control. Population-based data on colorectal cancer patients were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 107 patients in the cold site cohort and 109 in the control cohort. None developed COVID-19 within 30 days postoperatively. The proportions of pelvic and laparoscopic surgery were similar. The cold site cohort had more potentially avoidable stomas (32/94 (34%) vs 19/91 (21%), p = 0.0442). In the region, the proportion of colorectal cancer resections at the cold site increased from prepandemic 12.9% (58 of 448) to 43.3% (94 of 217) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A SARS-CoV-2-cold site can be kept infection-free by screening, allowing increased volumes of colorectal cancer surgery with outcomes comparable to prepandemic practice. The cold site model should be more widely adopted in future similar scenarios.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This study reports on the implementation of an entire cold site hospital for imperative colorectal surgery, in particular colorectal cancer, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. By comparing outcomes to prepandemic practices, we demonstrated that the cold site hospital was effective in preventing infection and safely increasing surgical volume many-fold.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Colorectal Cancer Surgery at a Regional Cold Site Centre During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Comparison With Prepandemic Practices.
Introduction: Stockholm, Sweden had among the highest excess mortality rates during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In March 2020, an entire hospital implemented an infection-free cold site infrastructure and scaled up imperative mainly colorectal cancer surgery, for the Stockholm health care region. The study evaluated the efficacy of the concept.
Methods: Strict preadmission screening and prophylactic interventions were implemented. The outcomes of the cold site cohort (30th March-21st June 2020) were compared to a prepandemic control. Population-based data on colorectal cancer patients were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry.
Results: There were 107 patients in the cold site cohort and 109 in the control cohort. None developed COVID-19 within 30 days postoperatively. The proportions of pelvic and laparoscopic surgery were similar. The cold site cohort had more potentially avoidable stomas (32/94 (34%) vs 19/91 (21%), p = 0.0442). In the region, the proportion of colorectal cancer resections at the cold site increased from prepandemic 12.9% (58 of 448) to 43.3% (94 of 217) (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: A SARS-CoV-2-cold site can be kept infection-free by screening, allowing increased volumes of colorectal cancer surgery with outcomes comparable to prepandemic practice. The cold site model should be more widely adopted in future similar scenarios.
Summary: This study reports on the implementation of an entire cold site hospital for imperative colorectal surgery, in particular colorectal cancer, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. By comparing outcomes to prepandemic practices, we demonstrated that the cold site hospital was effective in preventing infection and safely increasing surgical volume many-fold.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.