NeoScore:一种评估新生儿复苏过程中技术性和非技术性技能的新工具。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Leonardo Meggiolaro, Gary Weiner, Alex Staffler, Fiorenzo Lupi, Tommaso Canesso, Daniele Trevisanuto
{"title":"NeoScore:一种评估新生儿复苏过程中技术性和非技术性技能的新工具。","authors":"Leonardo Meggiolaro, Gary Weiner, Alex Staffler, Fiorenzo Lupi, Tommaso Canesso, Daniele Trevisanuto","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02210-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training with high-technology manikins improves cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention, but a checklist to assess both technical and non-technical skills is lacking. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist to evaluate healthcare's performance during simulated Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) scenarios.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two international neonatal resuscitation experts participated in a two-step modified Delphi process, rating each checklist item on a scale of 1-5 and providing feedback. Items with a mean rating below 4 or receiving comments were reviewed. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the final tool was assessed using video-recordings of simulated scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final checklist, validated by 15 experts, includes 33 items. Mean expert rating of all items was 4.35. The checklist showed moderate inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.67) overall, with excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8) for technical skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tool effectively evaluates technical skills but requires further refinement for non-technical skills assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NeoScore: a new tool to assess technical and non-technical skills during neonatal resuscitation.\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Meggiolaro, Gary Weiner, Alex Staffler, Fiorenzo Lupi, Tommaso Canesso, Daniele Trevisanuto\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41372-025-02210-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training with high-technology manikins improves cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention, but a checklist to assess both technical and non-technical skills is lacking. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist to evaluate healthcare's performance during simulated Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) scenarios.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two international neonatal resuscitation experts participated in a two-step modified Delphi process, rating each checklist item on a scale of 1-5 and providing feedback. Items with a mean rating below 4 or receiving comments were reviewed. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the final tool was assessed using video-recordings of simulated scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final checklist, validated by 15 experts, includes 33 items. Mean expert rating of all items was 4.35. The checklist showed moderate inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.67) overall, with excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8) for technical skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tool effectively evaluates technical skills but requires further refinement for non-technical skills assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02210-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02210-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用高科技人体模型训练可以提高心肺复苏(CPR)技能的保留,但缺乏评估技术和非技术技能的检查表。本研究旨在制定一个标准化的检查表,以评估在模拟新生儿复苏计划(NRP)情景下医疗保健的表现。材料与方法:22名国际新生儿复苏专家参与了两步修正德尔菲法,对每个检查表项目进行1-5分的评分并提供反馈。对平均评分低于4或收到评论的项目进行审查。使用模拟场景的视频记录来评估最终工具的内部可靠性(IRR)。结果:经15位专家验证的最终检查表包含33个项目。所有题目的平均专家评分为4.35分。量表总体上显示中等的量表间信度(ICC = 0.67),其中技术技能的量表具有优异的信度(ICC = 0.8)。结论:该工具可有效评估技术技能,但非技术技能评估需进一步完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NeoScore: a new tool to assess technical and non-technical skills during neonatal resuscitation.

Background: Training with high-technology manikins improves cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention, but a checklist to assess both technical and non-technical skills is lacking. This study aimed to develop a standardized checklist to evaluate healthcare's performance during simulated Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) scenarios.

Materials and methods: Twenty-two international neonatal resuscitation experts participated in a two-step modified Delphi process, rating each checklist item on a scale of 1-5 and providing feedback. Items with a mean rating below 4 or receiving comments were reviewed. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the final tool was assessed using video-recordings of simulated scenarios.

Results: The final checklist, validated by 15 experts, includes 33 items. Mean expert rating of all items was 4.35. The checklist showed moderate inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.67) overall, with excellent reliability (ICC = 0.8) for technical skills.

Conclusion: The tool effectively evaluates technical skills but requires further refinement for non-technical skills assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信