Elliott Bloom, Juan Carlos Torres-Mura, Marcelo Bertellotti, Fritz Hertel
{"title":"南美洲企鹅的生态形态学。","authors":"Elliott Bloom, Juan Carlos Torres-Mura, Marcelo Bertellotti, Fritz Hertel","doi":"10.1002/jmor.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A major goal of evolutionary ecology is to understand the interaction between ecological differences and the functional morphology of organisms. Studies of this type are common among flying birds but less so in penguins. Penguins (Spheniscidae) are the most derived extant underwater flying birds using their wings for swimming and beak when foraging. The Humboldt Penguin (<i>Spheniscus humboldti</i>) and Magellanic Penguin (<i>S. magellanicus</i>) occur along the coast of South America and their morphology was compared in allopatry and sympatry throughout their ranges. Measurements included: mass, tarsus length, four beak/head dimensions, bite force, wing loading, and aspect ratio. A thin-plate spline/relative warp analysis was also used to detect subtle differences in wing shape. Both species generally overlapped in trait morphology, but Magellanic Penguins showed greater trait diversity. Wing morphology was more homogenous between species than beak morphology indicating a similar mode of locomotion but potential differences in prey procurement. Morphological character displacement in sympatry was only evident in beak length. Local adaptation was common in other traits, and Punta Norte (Argentina) was often distinct in having high variation, notably in beak depth, wing loading, and wing shape (relative warp 1). This may be attributed to the fact that penguins here dive deep and forage farther from their colony; they also have a greater colony size that may contribute to greater intraspecific competition for resources. These results support a potentially optimal wing design for aquatic movement, which likely applies to other penguin species. Differences in morphology may also be related to differences between Atlantic and Pacific ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Morphology","volume":"286 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecomorphology of South American Penguins\",\"authors\":\"Elliott Bloom, Juan Carlos Torres-Mura, Marcelo Bertellotti, Fritz Hertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmor.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>A major goal of evolutionary ecology is to understand the interaction between ecological differences and the functional morphology of organisms. Studies of this type are common among flying birds but less so in penguins. Penguins (Spheniscidae) are the most derived extant underwater flying birds using their wings for swimming and beak when foraging. The Humboldt Penguin (<i>Spheniscus humboldti</i>) and Magellanic Penguin (<i>S. magellanicus</i>) occur along the coast of South America and their morphology was compared in allopatry and sympatry throughout their ranges. Measurements included: mass, tarsus length, four beak/head dimensions, bite force, wing loading, and aspect ratio. A thin-plate spline/relative warp analysis was also used to detect subtle differences in wing shape. Both species generally overlapped in trait morphology, but Magellanic Penguins showed greater trait diversity. Wing morphology was more homogenous between species than beak morphology indicating a similar mode of locomotion but potential differences in prey procurement. Morphological character displacement in sympatry was only evident in beak length. Local adaptation was common in other traits, and Punta Norte (Argentina) was often distinct in having high variation, notably in beak depth, wing loading, and wing shape (relative warp 1). This may be attributed to the fact that penguins here dive deep and forage farther from their colony; they also have a greater colony size that may contribute to greater intraspecific competition for resources. These results support a potentially optimal wing design for aquatic movement, which likely applies to other penguin species. Differences in morphology may also be related to differences between Atlantic and Pacific ecosystems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Morphology\",\"volume\":\"286 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Morphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmor.70025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmor.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A major goal of evolutionary ecology is to understand the interaction between ecological differences and the functional morphology of organisms. Studies of this type are common among flying birds but less so in penguins. Penguins (Spheniscidae) are the most derived extant underwater flying birds using their wings for swimming and beak when foraging. The Humboldt Penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) and Magellanic Penguin (S. magellanicus) occur along the coast of South America and their morphology was compared in allopatry and sympatry throughout their ranges. Measurements included: mass, tarsus length, four beak/head dimensions, bite force, wing loading, and aspect ratio. A thin-plate spline/relative warp analysis was also used to detect subtle differences in wing shape. Both species generally overlapped in trait morphology, but Magellanic Penguins showed greater trait diversity. Wing morphology was more homogenous between species than beak morphology indicating a similar mode of locomotion but potential differences in prey procurement. Morphological character displacement in sympatry was only evident in beak length. Local adaptation was common in other traits, and Punta Norte (Argentina) was often distinct in having high variation, notably in beak depth, wing loading, and wing shape (relative warp 1). This may be attributed to the fact that penguins here dive deep and forage farther from their colony; they also have a greater colony size that may contribute to greater intraspecific competition for resources. These results support a potentially optimal wing design for aquatic movement, which likely applies to other penguin species. Differences in morphology may also be related to differences between Atlantic and Pacific ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Morphology welcomes articles of original research in cytology, protozoology, embryology, and general morphology. Articles generally should not exceed 35 printed pages. Preliminary notices or articles of a purely descriptive morphological or taxonomic nature are not included. No paper which has already been published will be accepted, nor will simultaneous publications elsewhere be allowed.
The Journal of Morphology publishes research in functional, comparative, evolutionary and developmental morphology from vertebrates and invertebrates. Human and veterinary anatomy or paleontology are considered when an explicit connection to neontological animal morphology is presented, and the paper contains relevant information for the community of animal morphologists. Based on our long tradition, we continue to seek publishing the best papers in animal morphology.