{"title":"不典型发热伴血小板减少综合征患者。","authors":"Xin Yang, Guang-Qian Si, Hong-Han Ge, Chun-Hui Li, Ning Cui, Yi-Mei Yuan, Chao Zhou, Hao Li, Xiao-Ai Zhang, Ling Lin, Peng-Tao Bao, Wei Liu","doi":"10.1002/jmv.70164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging tick-borne disease with a high fatality rate. The clinical diagnosis criteria mainly rely on white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT), which, however, are of limited usage in identifying atypical SFTS. A multicenter study was performed in two hospitals from 2011 to 2023. SFTS patients were categorized as atypical or typical based on the clinical diagnosis criteria. Clinical progress and outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 2876 laboratory-confirmed SFTS patients were included in this study, 90.54% (2604/2876) of whom exhibited both thrombocytopenia and leukopenia and were defined as typical SFTS patients, while 9.46% (272/2876) were defined as atypical SFTS patients. Patients with typical SFTS were more likely to develop complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.48-2.92, p < 0.001) and fatal outcomes (adjusted OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.37-3.89, p = 0.002) compared to patients with atypical SFTS. Among atypical patients, those with decreased PLT and normal WBC levels (PLT↓ and WBC→) experienced increased complication rates (adjusted OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.30-6.05, p < 0.001) compared to those with decreased WBC and normal PLT (WBC↓ and PLT→). In the typical group, 238 patients developed thrombocytopenia earlier than leukocytopenia (defined as the TL group), while 311 subjects developed leukocytopenia earlier than thrombocytopenia (defined as the LT group). Compared to the LT group, patients in the TL group were more likely to develop fatal outcomes (HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.04-3.50). These findings highlight the presence of atypical SFTS cases that did not meet the clinical diagnosis criteria. Clinical profiles and outcomes differed between typical and atypical SFTS patients. A less stringent diagnostic criterion than combined thrombocytopenia and leukopenia is suggested for making clinical diagnoses within 7 days of disease onset.</p>","PeriodicalId":16354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Virology","volume":"97 1","pages":"e70164"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atypical Patients With Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Yang, Guang-Qian Si, Hong-Han Ge, Chun-Hui Li, Ning Cui, Yi-Mei Yuan, Chao Zhou, Hao Li, Xiao-Ai Zhang, Ling Lin, Peng-Tao Bao, Wei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmv.70164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging tick-borne disease with a high fatality rate. The clinical diagnosis criteria mainly rely on white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT), which, however, are of limited usage in identifying atypical SFTS. A multicenter study was performed in two hospitals from 2011 to 2023. SFTS patients were categorized as atypical or typical based on the clinical diagnosis criteria. Clinical progress and outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 2876 laboratory-confirmed SFTS patients were included in this study, 90.54% (2604/2876) of whom exhibited both thrombocytopenia and leukopenia and were defined as typical SFTS patients, while 9.46% (272/2876) were defined as atypical SFTS patients. Patients with typical SFTS were more likely to develop complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.48-2.92, p < 0.001) and fatal outcomes (adjusted OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.37-3.89, p = 0.002) compared to patients with atypical SFTS. Among atypical patients, those with decreased PLT and normal WBC levels (PLT↓ and WBC→) experienced increased complication rates (adjusted OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.30-6.05, p < 0.001) compared to those with decreased WBC and normal PLT (WBC↓ and PLT→). In the typical group, 238 patients developed thrombocytopenia earlier than leukocytopenia (defined as the TL group), while 311 subjects developed leukocytopenia earlier than thrombocytopenia (defined as the LT group). Compared to the LT group, patients in the TL group were more likely to develop fatal outcomes (HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.04-3.50). These findings highlight the presence of atypical SFTS cases that did not meet the clinical diagnosis criteria. Clinical profiles and outcomes differed between typical and atypical SFTS patients. A less stringent diagnostic criterion than combined thrombocytopenia and leukopenia is suggested for making clinical diagnoses within 7 days of disease onset.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"e70164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70164\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.70164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
发热伴血小板减少综合征(SFTS)是一种新出现的高致死率的蜱传疾病。临床诊断标准主要依靠白细胞(WBC)和血小板(PLT),但对非典型SFTS的诊断作用有限。2011 - 2023年在两家医院进行了一项多中心研究。根据临床诊断标准将SFTS患者分为不典型和典型。比较两组患者的临床进展及转归。本研究共纳入2876例实验室确诊的SFTS患者,其中90.54%(2604/2876)同时表现为血小板减少和白细胞减少,定义为典型SFTS患者,9.46%(272/2876)定义为不典型SFTS患者。典型的SFTS患者更容易发生并发症(校正优势比[OR] = 2.09, 95%可信区间[CI]:1.48-2.92, p
Atypical Patients With Severe Fever With Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.
Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging tick-borne disease with a high fatality rate. The clinical diagnosis criteria mainly rely on white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT), which, however, are of limited usage in identifying atypical SFTS. A multicenter study was performed in two hospitals from 2011 to 2023. SFTS patients were categorized as atypical or typical based on the clinical diagnosis criteria. Clinical progress and outcomes were compared between the two groups. A total of 2876 laboratory-confirmed SFTS patients were included in this study, 90.54% (2604/2876) of whom exhibited both thrombocytopenia and leukopenia and were defined as typical SFTS patients, while 9.46% (272/2876) were defined as atypical SFTS patients. Patients with typical SFTS were more likely to develop complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.48-2.92, p < 0.001) and fatal outcomes (adjusted OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.37-3.89, p = 0.002) compared to patients with atypical SFTS. Among atypical patients, those with decreased PLT and normal WBC levels (PLT↓ and WBC→) experienced increased complication rates (adjusted OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.30-6.05, p < 0.001) compared to those with decreased WBC and normal PLT (WBC↓ and PLT→). In the typical group, 238 patients developed thrombocytopenia earlier than leukocytopenia (defined as the TL group), while 311 subjects developed leukocytopenia earlier than thrombocytopenia (defined as the LT group). Compared to the LT group, patients in the TL group were more likely to develop fatal outcomes (HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.04-3.50). These findings highlight the presence of atypical SFTS cases that did not meet the clinical diagnosis criteria. Clinical profiles and outcomes differed between typical and atypical SFTS patients. A less stringent diagnostic criterion than combined thrombocytopenia and leukopenia is suggested for making clinical diagnoses within 7 days of disease onset.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Virology focuses on publishing original scientific papers on both basic and applied research related to viruses that affect humans. The journal publishes reports covering a wide range of topics, including the characterization, diagnosis, epidemiology, immunology, and pathogenesis of human virus infections. It also includes studies on virus morphology, genetics, replication, and interactions with host cells.
The intended readership of the journal includes virologists, microbiologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, diagnostic laboratory technologists, epidemiologists, hematologists, and cell biologists.
The Journal of Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Abstracts in Anthropology (Sage), CABI, AgBiotech News & Information, National Agricultural Library, Biological Abstracts, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, Veterinary Bulletin, and others.