间接荧光抗体法与改良凝集法检测新热带灵长类弓形虫IgG抗体的比较

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Nycolas Octavio Ribeiro Carvalho, Raquel Cuba Gaspar, Suellen Gonçalves Lima, Dayane da Silva Zanini, Nássarah Jabur Lot Rodrigues, Victor Yunes Guimarães, Aristeu Vieira da Silva, Sheila Canevese Rahal, Anna Luisa Pizzaia Henrique, Felipe Fornazari, Helio Langoni
{"title":"间接荧光抗体法与改良凝集法检测新热带灵长类弓形虫IgG抗体的比较","authors":"Nycolas Octavio Ribeiro Carvalho,&nbsp;Raquel Cuba Gaspar,&nbsp;Suellen Gonçalves Lima,&nbsp;Dayane da Silva Zanini,&nbsp;Nássarah Jabur Lot Rodrigues,&nbsp;Victor Yunes Guimarães,&nbsp;Aristeu Vieira da Silva,&nbsp;Sheila Canevese Rahal,&nbsp;Anna Luisa Pizzaia Henrique,&nbsp;Felipe Fornazari,&nbsp;Helio Langoni","doi":"10.1111/jmp.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p><i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> is a zoonotic parasite with a great impact on the health of Neotropical primates (NP). The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between the immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and the modified agglutination test (MAT) to detect IgG anti-<i>T</i>. <i>gondii</i> antibodies in NP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Convenience serum samples of 77 animals were tested by IFAT and MAT according to standard protocols, and the agreement between results was analyzed using McNemar's <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The samples included 30 red-handed howlers (<i>Alouatta belzebul</i>), 24 brown howler monkeys (<i>Alouatta guariba</i>), 22 capuchin monkeys (<i>Sapajus nigritus</i>), and one wedge-capped capuchin (<i>Cebus olivaceous</i>). Overall prevalence was 25.9% (<i>n</i> = 20), with three animals positive by IFAT and 20 positives by MAT. The agreement between tests was low (Kappa = 0.21).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results indicated that IFAT and MAT are not comparable to assess qualitatively anti-<i>T</i>. <i>gondii</i> IgG serum antibodies in the studied species.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Primatology","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test and Modified Agglutination Test for Detecting Anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG Antibodies in Neotropical Primates\",\"authors\":\"Nycolas Octavio Ribeiro Carvalho,&nbsp;Raquel Cuba Gaspar,&nbsp;Suellen Gonçalves Lima,&nbsp;Dayane da Silva Zanini,&nbsp;Nássarah Jabur Lot Rodrigues,&nbsp;Victor Yunes Guimarães,&nbsp;Aristeu Vieira da Silva,&nbsp;Sheila Canevese Rahal,&nbsp;Anna Luisa Pizzaia Henrique,&nbsp;Felipe Fornazari,&nbsp;Helio Langoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmp.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p><i>Toxoplasma gondii</i> is a zoonotic parasite with a great impact on the health of Neotropical primates (NP). The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between the immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and the modified agglutination test (MAT) to detect IgG anti-<i>T</i>. <i>gondii</i> antibodies in NP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Convenience serum samples of 77 animals were tested by IFAT and MAT according to standard protocols, and the agreement between results was analyzed using McNemar's <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The samples included 30 red-handed howlers (<i>Alouatta belzebul</i>), 24 brown howler monkeys (<i>Alouatta guariba</i>), 22 capuchin monkeys (<i>Sapajus nigritus</i>), and one wedge-capped capuchin (<i>Cebus olivaceous</i>). Overall prevalence was 25.9% (<i>n</i> = 20), with three animals positive by IFAT and 20 positives by MAT. The agreement between tests was low (Kappa = 0.21).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results indicated that IFAT and MAT are not comparable to assess qualitatively anti-<i>T</i>. <i>gondii</i> IgG serum antibodies in the studied species.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Primatology\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Primatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmp.70002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmp.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:刚地弓形虫是一种严重影响新热带灵长类动物健康的人畜共患寄生虫。本研究的目的是比较免疫荧光抗体试验(IFAT)和改良凝集试验(MAT)检测IgG抗t抗体的一致性。NP中的弓形虫抗体。方法:按标准方案对77只动物的方便血清进行IFAT和MAT检测,采用McNemar χ2检验分析结果之间的一致性。结果:共捕获红手吼猴30只,褐吼猴24只,僧帽猴22只,楔顶僧帽猴1只。总患病率为25.9% (n = 20),其中3只动物IFAT阳性,20只动物MAT阳性。试验之间的一致性很低(Kappa = 0.21)。结论:IFAT和MAT在定性评价抗t抗体方面不具有可比性。弓形虫IgG血清抗体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test and Modified Agglutination Test for Detecting Anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG Antibodies in Neotropical Primates

Background

Toxoplasma gondii is a zoonotic parasite with a great impact on the health of Neotropical primates (NP). The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between the immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and the modified agglutination test (MAT) to detect IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies in NP.

Methods

Convenience serum samples of 77 animals were tested by IFAT and MAT according to standard protocols, and the agreement between results was analyzed using McNemar's χ2 test.

Results

The samples included 30 red-handed howlers (Alouatta belzebul), 24 brown howler monkeys (Alouatta guariba), 22 capuchin monkeys (Sapajus nigritus), and one wedge-capped capuchin (Cebus olivaceous). Overall prevalence was 25.9% (n = 20), with three animals positive by IFAT and 20 positives by MAT. The agreement between tests was low (Kappa = 0.21).

Conclusion

The results indicated that IFAT and MAT are not comparable to assess qualitatively anti-T. gondii IgG serum antibodies in the studied species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
42.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Primatology publishes research on non-human primates as models to study, prevent, and/or treat human diseases; subjects include veterinary medicine; morphology, physiology, reproductive biology, central nervous system, and cardiovascular diseases; husbandry, handling, experimental methodology, and management of non-human primate colonies and laboratories; non-human primate wildlife management; and behaviour and sociology as related to medical conditions and captive non-human primate needs. Published material includes: Original Manuscripts - research results; Case Reports - scientific documentation of a single clinical study; Short Papers - case histories, methodologies, and techniques of particular interest; Letters to the Editor - opinions, controversies and sporadic scientific observations; Perspectives – opinion piece about existing research on a particular topic; Minireviews – a concise review of existing literature; Book Reviews by invitation; Special Issues containing selected papers from specialized meetings; and Editorials and memoriams authored by the Editor-in-Chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信