K. M. S. Aidar, L. T. A. Cintra, M. C. B. Ferreira, T. C. Fagundes, L. M. B. Esteves, J. Goto, A. Catelan, A. L. F. Briso
{"title":"家用漂白条与凝胶的对比分析:牙釉质变色、粗糙度及显微硬度分析。","authors":"K. M. S. Aidar, L. T. A. Cintra, M. C. B. Ferreira, T. C. Fagundes, L. M. B. Esteves, J. Goto, A. Catelan, A. L. F. Briso","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the color alteration, surface roughness and microhardness and cross-sectional microhardness of bovine enamel treated with at-home whitening strips and gels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-six pigmented specimens (<i>n</i> = 11) were allocated to six groups: C—cotton wool moistened with distilled water for 1 h; SDS—sodium dithionite strip, for 1 h; HPS—6.5% hydrogen peroxide strip, for 1 h; CPS—20% carbamide peroxide strip, for 1 h; HPG—7.5% hydrogen peroxide gel, for 1 h; CPG—10% carbamide peroxide gel, for 4 h. The treatments lasted 10 days, calculating the ∆E, ∆<i>E</i>\n <sub>00</sub>, and ∆<i>W</i>\n <sub>ID</sub> at baseline, 5 and 10 days, and 14 days after completion. Additional 66 polished discs (<i>n</i> = 11) were used to analyze the surface roughness and microhardness of enamel before and after bleaching, cross-sectional microhardness and integrated mineral loss (ΔZ; %Vol × μm). Data were subjected to statistical analysis by two-way Anova RM and Tukey post-test (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In ∆E and ∆W<sub>ID</sub> analysis, greater values were obtained in CPG (<i>p</i> < 0.001), followed by HPG and HPS (<i>p</i> = 0.271). SDS and CPS (<i>p</i> < 0.001) exceeded only C (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In ∆<i>E</i>\n <sub>00</sub>, at completion of treatments, the results were similar; however, HPG = HPS = CPS (<i>p</i> = 0.237). There was an increase in roughness and decrease in surface microhardness in all bleaching groups (<i>p</i> < 0.005). Concerning the cross-sectional microhardness, the treatments were equal to C at 150 μm, the last depth analyzed. For Δ<i>Z</i>, the values of SDS, CPS, HPG, and CPG groups showed similar mineral loss (<i>p</i> > 0.001), and the lowest value was exhibited in the Control group, followed by HPS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although the strips were aesthetically effective, the CPG and HPG groups presented highest values in the ∆<i>E</i>\n <sub>00</sub> and ∆<i>W</i>\n <sub>ID</sub> analysis. However, all treatments influenced the enamel surface, increasing roughness and decreasing surface and transverse microhardness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>The whitening gels promoted greater chromatic changes, but all treatments affected the enamel surface, increasing roughness and decreasing surface and transverse microhardness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":"37 6","pages":"1504-1514"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis Between Strip and Gels Indicated for at Home Bleaching: Analysis of Color Alteration, Roughness and Microhardness of Dental Enamel\",\"authors\":\"K. M. S. Aidar, L. T. A. Cintra, M. C. B. Ferreira, T. C. Fagundes, L. M. B. Esteves, J. Goto, A. Catelan, A. L. F. Briso\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare the color alteration, surface roughness and microhardness and cross-sectional microhardness of bovine enamel treated with at-home whitening strips and gels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-six pigmented specimens (<i>n</i> = 11) were allocated to six groups: C—cotton wool moistened with distilled water for 1 h; SDS—sodium dithionite strip, for 1 h; HPS—6.5% hydrogen peroxide strip, for 1 h; CPS—20% carbamide peroxide strip, for 1 h; HPG—7.5% hydrogen peroxide gel, for 1 h; CPG—10% carbamide peroxide gel, for 4 h. The treatments lasted 10 days, calculating the ∆E, ∆<i>E</i>\\n <sub>00</sub>, and ∆<i>W</i>\\n <sub>ID</sub> at baseline, 5 and 10 days, and 14 days after completion. Additional 66 polished discs (<i>n</i> = 11) were used to analyze the surface roughness and microhardness of enamel before and after bleaching, cross-sectional microhardness and integrated mineral loss (ΔZ; %Vol × μm). Data were subjected to statistical analysis by two-way Anova RM and Tukey post-test (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In ∆E and ∆W<sub>ID</sub> analysis, greater values were obtained in CPG (<i>p</i> < 0.001), followed by HPG and HPS (<i>p</i> = 0.271). SDS and CPS (<i>p</i> < 0.001) exceeded only C (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In ∆<i>E</i>\\n <sub>00</sub>, at completion of treatments, the results were similar; however, HPG = HPS = CPS (<i>p</i> = 0.237). There was an increase in roughness and decrease in surface microhardness in all bleaching groups (<i>p</i> < 0.005). Concerning the cross-sectional microhardness, the treatments were equal to C at 150 μm, the last depth analyzed. For Δ<i>Z</i>, the values of SDS, CPS, HPG, and CPG groups showed similar mineral loss (<i>p</i> > 0.001), and the lowest value was exhibited in the Control group, followed by HPS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although the strips were aesthetically effective, the CPG and HPG groups presented highest values in the ∆<i>E</i>\\n <sub>00</sub> and ∆<i>W</i>\\n <sub>ID</sub> analysis. However, all treatments influenced the enamel surface, increasing roughness and decreasing surface and transverse microhardness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\\n \\n <p>The whitening gels promoted greater chromatic changes, but all treatments affected the enamel surface, increasing roughness and decreasing surface and transverse microhardness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"1504-1514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis Between Strip and Gels Indicated for at Home Bleaching: Analysis of Color Alteration, Roughness and Microhardness of Dental Enamel
Purpose
To compare the color alteration, surface roughness and microhardness and cross-sectional microhardness of bovine enamel treated with at-home whitening strips and gels.
Materials and Methods
Sixty-six pigmented specimens (n = 11) were allocated to six groups: C—cotton wool moistened with distilled water for 1 h; SDS—sodium dithionite strip, for 1 h; HPS—6.5% hydrogen peroxide strip, for 1 h; CPS—20% carbamide peroxide strip, for 1 h; HPG—7.5% hydrogen peroxide gel, for 1 h; CPG—10% carbamide peroxide gel, for 4 h. The treatments lasted 10 days, calculating the ∆E, ∆E00, and ∆WID at baseline, 5 and 10 days, and 14 days after completion. Additional 66 polished discs (n = 11) were used to analyze the surface roughness and microhardness of enamel before and after bleaching, cross-sectional microhardness and integrated mineral loss (ΔZ; %Vol × μm). Data were subjected to statistical analysis by two-way Anova RM and Tukey post-test (α = 0.05).
Results
In ∆E and ∆WID analysis, greater values were obtained in CPG (p < 0.001), followed by HPG and HPS (p = 0.271). SDS and CPS (p < 0.001) exceeded only C (p < 0.001). In ∆E00, at completion of treatments, the results were similar; however, HPG = HPS = CPS (p = 0.237). There was an increase in roughness and decrease in surface microhardness in all bleaching groups (p < 0.005). Concerning the cross-sectional microhardness, the treatments were equal to C at 150 μm, the last depth analyzed. For ΔZ, the values of SDS, CPS, HPG, and CPG groups showed similar mineral loss (p > 0.001), and the lowest value was exhibited in the Control group, followed by HPS group (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Although the strips were aesthetically effective, the CPG and HPG groups presented highest values in the ∆E00 and ∆WID analysis. However, all treatments influenced the enamel surface, increasing roughness and decreasing surface and transverse microhardness.
Clinical Relevance
The whitening gels promoted greater chromatic changes, but all treatments affected the enamel surface, increasing roughness and decreasing surface and transverse microhardness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics