Karen Nieto-Flores, Luis Sabillón, Jayne Stratton, Andréia Bianchini
{"title":"奶牛场个人防护装备中李斯特菌有效消毒程序的确定。","authors":"Karen Nieto-Flores, Luis Sabillón, Jayne Stratton, Andréia Bianchini","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of Listeria monocytogenes in the dairy environment remains a food safety challenge. The source of microbial contamination may include employees and their personal protective equipment (PPE). This study investigated the effectiveness of cleaning protocols (i.e., detergents and mechanical action) and three chemical sanitizers commonly employed at dairy facilities against Listeria innocua contamination on different types of gloves, aprons, and boots. Coupons made of PPE material were inoculated with a two-strain cocktail of L. innocua suspended in either Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) or skim milk to determine the potential effect of organic matter. In general, peroxyacetic acid (0.20% (v/v)) was more effective at reducing Listeria counts on aprons and gloves compared to chlorine and quaternary ammonium at 200 ppm. Depending on the type of sanitizer, Listeria reductions ranged from 1.95 - 4.72 and 1.52 - 4.60 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> on aprons and gloves, respectively. In comparison, sanitizers achieved a 0.93 - 2.32 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> reduction on boot soles, with no significant differences observed among sanitizers. PVC (vinyl) gloves achieved lower Listeria log reductions than nitrile and latex gloves. Sanitizers were less effective on boots with wider and deeper lugs than those with shallow lugs. The presence of organic matter significantly reduced the antimicrobial efficacy of all sanitizers (<1 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> reduction). However, the inclusion of cleaning protocols with and without mechanical action achieved a ≥3 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> reduction in the different types of PPE. This study highlights the importance of scrubbing as an essential step to reduce Listeria on PPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of an Effective Sanitizing Procedure for Listeria innocua in Personal Protective Equipment Used in Dairy Facilities.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Nieto-Flores, Luis Sabillón, Jayne Stratton, Andréia Bianchini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The presence of Listeria monocytogenes in the dairy environment remains a food safety challenge. The source of microbial contamination may include employees and their personal protective equipment (PPE). This study investigated the effectiveness of cleaning protocols (i.e., detergents and mechanical action) and three chemical sanitizers commonly employed at dairy facilities against Listeria innocua contamination on different types of gloves, aprons, and boots. Coupons made of PPE material were inoculated with a two-strain cocktail of L. innocua suspended in either Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) or skim milk to determine the potential effect of organic matter. In general, peroxyacetic acid (0.20% (v/v)) was more effective at reducing Listeria counts on aprons and gloves compared to chlorine and quaternary ammonium at 200 ppm. Depending on the type of sanitizer, Listeria reductions ranged from 1.95 - 4.72 and 1.52 - 4.60 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> on aprons and gloves, respectively. In comparison, sanitizers achieved a 0.93 - 2.32 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> reduction on boot soles, with no significant differences observed among sanitizers. PVC (vinyl) gloves achieved lower Listeria log reductions than nitrile and latex gloves. Sanitizers were less effective on boots with wider and deeper lugs than those with shallow lugs. The presence of organic matter significantly reduced the antimicrobial efficacy of all sanitizers (<1 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> reduction). However, the inclusion of cleaning protocols with and without mechanical action achieved a ≥3 log CFU/in<sup>2</sup> reduction in the different types of PPE. This study highlights the importance of scrubbing as an essential step to reduce Listeria on PPE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100455\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100455","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of an Effective Sanitizing Procedure for Listeria innocua in Personal Protective Equipment Used in Dairy Facilities.
The presence of Listeria monocytogenes in the dairy environment remains a food safety challenge. The source of microbial contamination may include employees and their personal protective equipment (PPE). This study investigated the effectiveness of cleaning protocols (i.e., detergents and mechanical action) and three chemical sanitizers commonly employed at dairy facilities against Listeria innocua contamination on different types of gloves, aprons, and boots. Coupons made of PPE material were inoculated with a two-strain cocktail of L. innocua suspended in either Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) or skim milk to determine the potential effect of organic matter. In general, peroxyacetic acid (0.20% (v/v)) was more effective at reducing Listeria counts on aprons and gloves compared to chlorine and quaternary ammonium at 200 ppm. Depending on the type of sanitizer, Listeria reductions ranged from 1.95 - 4.72 and 1.52 - 4.60 log CFU/in2 on aprons and gloves, respectively. In comparison, sanitizers achieved a 0.93 - 2.32 log CFU/in2 reduction on boot soles, with no significant differences observed among sanitizers. PVC (vinyl) gloves achieved lower Listeria log reductions than nitrile and latex gloves. Sanitizers were less effective on boots with wider and deeper lugs than those with shallow lugs. The presence of organic matter significantly reduced the antimicrobial efficacy of all sanitizers (<1 log CFU/in2 reduction). However, the inclusion of cleaning protocols with and without mechanical action achieved a ≥3 log CFU/in2 reduction in the different types of PPE. This study highlights the importance of scrubbing as an essential step to reduce Listeria on PPE.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.