短-长轴联合与内斜轴联合用于颈内静脉插管:一项前瞻性单盲随机临床试验。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Sarah Afifi, Sabri A Soltan, Ahmed M G Farag
{"title":"短-长轴联合与内斜轴联合用于颈内静脉插管:一项前瞻性单盲随机临床试验。","authors":"Sarah Afifi, Sabri A Soltan, Ahmed M G Farag","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>Previous literature suggested the advantage of combined short-long axis (CSLA) technique to avoid posterior wall puncture during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation. The purpose of this study is to define the best ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation technique regarding the success rate in the first trial of insertion, time to successful central line placement, number of attempts, procedural complications, and operator satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-blinded, prospective randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Elective cardiac surgeries in a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred seventy-eight elective cardiac surgery patients older than 18 years accepted to participate in the study and signed the informed consent.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized into two equal groups: medial oblique axis and CSLA. During the technique, vein dimensions, patient characteristics, technique duration, posterior wall puncture, number of attempts, complications, and operator satisfaction were documented.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Apart from body weight, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. Compared to the CSLA, the medial oblique approach showed significantly higher first-trial success rate (92.1% v 75.0%, p = 0.002), less time for successful insertion (mean ± SD, 60.9 ± 54.9 seconds v 110.7 ± 101.6 seconds, p < 0.001), accomplishment with fewer attempts (mean ± SD, 1.09 ± 0.28 v 1.44 ± 0.81, p < 0.001), and higher operator satisfaction (mean ± SD, 4.45 ± 0.92 v 3.46 ± 1.32, p < 0.001). No significant difference in complications, including posterior wall puncture (p = 0.469), was noted between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the medial oblique axis approach was superior to the CSLA approach regarding first-trial success rate, time to successful line placement, number of attempts, and operator satisfaction when used during elective cannulation of the IJV. However, regarding the incidence of complications, there was no advantage of one approach over the other. Further research is needed to confirm these results among specific groups of operators, with awake patients and in emergent situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Short-Long Axis Versus Medial Oblique Axis for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation: A Prospective Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Afifi, Sabri A Soltan, Ahmed M G Farag\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>Previous literature suggested the advantage of combined short-long axis (CSLA) technique to avoid posterior wall puncture during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation. The purpose of this study is to define the best ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation technique regarding the success rate in the first trial of insertion, time to successful central line placement, number of attempts, procedural complications, and operator satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-blinded, prospective randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Elective cardiac surgeries in a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred seventy-eight elective cardiac surgery patients older than 18 years accepted to participate in the study and signed the informed consent.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized into two equal groups: medial oblique axis and CSLA. During the technique, vein dimensions, patient characteristics, technique duration, posterior wall puncture, number of attempts, complications, and operator satisfaction were documented.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Apart from body weight, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. Compared to the CSLA, the medial oblique approach showed significantly higher first-trial success rate (92.1% v 75.0%, p = 0.002), less time for successful insertion (mean ± SD, 60.9 ± 54.9 seconds v 110.7 ± 101.6 seconds, p < 0.001), accomplishment with fewer attempts (mean ± SD, 1.09 ± 0.28 v 1.44 ± 0.81, p < 0.001), and higher operator satisfaction (mean ± SD, 4.45 ± 0.92 v 3.46 ± 1.32, p < 0.001). No significant difference in complications, including posterior wall puncture (p = 0.469), was noted between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the medial oblique axis approach was superior to the CSLA approach regarding first-trial success rate, time to successful line placement, number of attempts, and operator satisfaction when used during elective cannulation of the IJV. However, regarding the incidence of complications, there was no advantage of one approach over the other. Further research is needed to confirm these results among specific groups of operators, with awake patients and in emergent situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.12.046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:已有文献表明,短-长联合轴(CSLA)技术在颈内静脉(IJV)插管时可避免后壁穿刺。本研究的目的是确定超声引导下最佳的IJV插管技术,包括首次插入的成功率、成功放置中心管的时间、尝试次数、手术并发症和操作人员满意度。设计:单盲、前瞻性随机临床试验。设置:选择性心脏手术在三级保健中心。参与者:178名年龄大于18岁的选择性心脏手术患者接受参与研究并签署知情同意书。干预措施:患者随机分为两组:内侧斜轴组和CSLA组。在技术过程中,记录了静脉尺寸,患者特征,技术持续时间,后壁穿刺,尝试次数,并发症和操作人员满意度。测量和主要结果:除了体重外,两组之间的基线特征无显著差异。与CSLA相比,内侧斜入路的首次成功率显著提高(92.1% v 75.0%, p = 0.002),成功插入时间显著缩短(平均±SD, 60.9±54.9秒v 110.7±101.6秒,p < 0.001),完成次数显著减少(平均±SD, 1.09±0.28 v 1.44±0.81,p < 0.001),操作者满意度显著提高(平均±SD, 4.45±0.92 v 3.46±1.32,p < 0.001)。两组术后并发症(包括后壁穿刺)差异无统计学意义(p = 0.469)。结论:本研究表明内侧斜轴入路在首次试验成功率、线放置成功时间、尝试次数和手术者满意度方面优于CSLA入路。然而,就并发症的发生率而言,没有一种入路优于另一种入路。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果在特定的操作员群体,清醒的病人和紧急情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined Short-Long Axis Versus Medial Oblique Axis for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation: A Prospective Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objective(s): Previous literature suggested the advantage of combined short-long axis (CSLA) technique to avoid posterior wall puncture during internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation. The purpose of this study is to define the best ultrasound-guided IJV cannulation technique regarding the success rate in the first trial of insertion, time to successful central line placement, number of attempts, procedural complications, and operator satisfaction.

Design: Single-blinded, prospective randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Elective cardiac surgeries in a tertiary care center.

Participants: One hundred seventy-eight elective cardiac surgery patients older than 18 years accepted to participate in the study and signed the informed consent.

Interventions: Patients were randomized into two equal groups: medial oblique axis and CSLA. During the technique, vein dimensions, patient characteristics, technique duration, posterior wall puncture, number of attempts, complications, and operator satisfaction were documented.

Measurements and main results: Apart from body weight, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. Compared to the CSLA, the medial oblique approach showed significantly higher first-trial success rate (92.1% v 75.0%, p = 0.002), less time for successful insertion (mean ± SD, 60.9 ± 54.9 seconds v 110.7 ± 101.6 seconds, p < 0.001), accomplishment with fewer attempts (mean ± SD, 1.09 ± 0.28 v 1.44 ± 0.81, p < 0.001), and higher operator satisfaction (mean ± SD, 4.45 ± 0.92 v 3.46 ± 1.32, p < 0.001). No significant difference in complications, including posterior wall puncture (p = 0.469), was noted between both groups.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the medial oblique axis approach was superior to the CSLA approach regarding first-trial success rate, time to successful line placement, number of attempts, and operator satisfaction when used during elective cannulation of the IJV. However, regarding the incidence of complications, there was no advantage of one approach over the other. Further research is needed to confirm these results among specific groups of operators, with awake patients and in emergent situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信