贝达喹啉、普雷托马尼、利奈唑胺和莫西沙星(BPaLM)治疗多药或利福平耐药结核病:一项系统综述。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.36416/1806-3756/e20240295
Denise Rossato Silva, Flávia Fonseca Fernandes, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Wanderley Bernando, Margareth Maria Pretti Dalcolmo, Fernanda Dockhorn Costa Johansen, Fernanda Carvalho de Queiroz Mello
{"title":"贝达喹啉、普雷托马尼、利奈唑胺和莫西沙星(BPaLM)治疗多药或利福平耐药结核病:一项系统综述。","authors":"Denise Rossato Silva, Flávia Fonseca Fernandes, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Wanderley Bernando, Margareth Maria Pretti Dalcolmo, Fernanda Dockhorn Costa Johansen, Fernanda Carvalho de Queiroz Mello","doi":"10.36416/1806-3756/e20240295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the available evidence comparing the use of the bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) regimen for 6 months with that of standard-of-care regimens for patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a systematic review of clinical trials comparing the use of the BPaLM regimen with the standard of care in patients with MDR/RR-TB. The main outcome measure was an unfavorable endpoint (a composite of death, treatment failure, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up, and recurrence), and secondary outcome measures included adverse events and serious adverse events. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, from their inception to January 31, 2024, with no limitation as to language or year of publication. The risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,668 studies were retrieved; only one (a randomized clinical trial) met the inclusion criteria and was included. In patients with MDR/RR-TB, treatment with the BPaLM regimen, when compared with the standard of care, reduced the risk of an unfavorable outcome (composite, number needed to treat [NNT] = 7); early treatment discontinuation (NNT = 8); adverse events and discontinuation (NNT = 12); and serious adverse events (NNT = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review of the use of BPaLM in patients with MDR/RR-TB, although it included only one study, showed that BPaLM is more effective than is the standard of care and has a better safety profile. That has major implications for guidelines on the treatment of MDR/RR-TB.</p>","PeriodicalId":14845,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","volume":"50 6","pages":"e20240295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) for multidrug- or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Denise Rossato Silva, Flávia Fonseca Fernandes, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Wanderley Bernando, Margareth Maria Pretti Dalcolmo, Fernanda Dockhorn Costa Johansen, Fernanda Carvalho de Queiroz Mello\",\"doi\":\"10.36416/1806-3756/e20240295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the available evidence comparing the use of the bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) regimen for 6 months with that of standard-of-care regimens for patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a systematic review of clinical trials comparing the use of the BPaLM regimen with the standard of care in patients with MDR/RR-TB. The main outcome measure was an unfavorable endpoint (a composite of death, treatment failure, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up, and recurrence), and secondary outcome measures included adverse events and serious adverse events. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, from their inception to January 31, 2024, with no limitation as to language or year of publication. The risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,668 studies were retrieved; only one (a randomized clinical trial) met the inclusion criteria and was included. In patients with MDR/RR-TB, treatment with the BPaLM regimen, when compared with the standard of care, reduced the risk of an unfavorable outcome (composite, number needed to treat [NNT] = 7); early treatment discontinuation (NNT = 8); adverse events and discontinuation (NNT = 12); and serious adverse events (NNT = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review of the use of BPaLM in patients with MDR/RR-TB, although it included only one study, showed that BPaLM is more effective than is the standard of care and has a better safety profile. That has major implications for guidelines on the treatment of MDR/RR-TB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"e20240295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665299/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240295\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20240295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价贝达喹啉、普雷托马奈德、利奈唑胺和莫西沙星(BPaLM)治疗6个月与耐多药或利福平结核病(MDR/RR-TB)患者标准治疗方案的现有证据。方法:这是一项比较使用BPaLM方案与MDR/RR-TB患者标准护理的临床试验的系统综述。主要结局指标是不利终点(死亡、治疗失败、治疗停止、失去随访和复发的综合指标),次要结局指标包括不良事件和严重不良事件。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、谷歌Scholar、LILACS和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,从它们成立到2024年1月31日,没有语言或出版年份的限制。偏倚风险采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估,证据质量采用分级推荐评估、发展和评价方法。结果:共检索到3,668项研究;只有一项(随机临床试验)符合纳入标准并被纳入。在MDR/RR-TB患者中,与标准治疗方案相比,BPaLM方案治疗降低了不良结果的风险(综合,需要治疗的人数[NNT] = 7);早期停药(NNT = 8);不良事件和停药(NNT = 12);结论:这篇关于BPaLM在MDR/RR-TB患者中使用的系统综述,虽然只包括一项研究,但表明BPaLM比标准治疗更有效,并且具有更好的安全性。这对耐多药/耐药结核病治疗指南具有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) for multidrug- or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review.

Objective: To evaluate the available evidence comparing the use of the bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) regimen for 6 months with that of standard-of-care regimens for patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB).

Methods: This was a systematic review of clinical trials comparing the use of the BPaLM regimen with the standard of care in patients with MDR/RR-TB. The main outcome measure was an unfavorable endpoint (a composite of death, treatment failure, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up, and recurrence), and secondary outcome measures included adverse events and serious adverse events. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, from their inception to January 31, 2024, with no limitation as to language or year of publication. The risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Results: A total of 3,668 studies were retrieved; only one (a randomized clinical trial) met the inclusion criteria and was included. In patients with MDR/RR-TB, treatment with the BPaLM regimen, when compared with the standard of care, reduced the risk of an unfavorable outcome (composite, number needed to treat [NNT] = 7); early treatment discontinuation (NNT = 8); adverse events and discontinuation (NNT = 12); and serious adverse events (NNT = 5).

Conclusions: This systematic review of the use of BPaLM in patients with MDR/RR-TB, although it included only one study, showed that BPaLM is more effective than is the standard of care and has a better safety profile. That has major implications for guidelines on the treatment of MDR/RR-TB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia
Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
118
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes scientific articles that contribute to the improvement of knowledge in the field of the lung diseases and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信