美国农村妇女爱丁堡产后抑郁量表的心理测量特征。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Issues in Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1080/01612840.2024.2434907
Elizabeth Lau, Yenupini Joyce Adams, Roya Ghiaseddin
{"title":"美国农村妇女爱丁堡产后抑郁量表的心理测量特征。","authors":"Elizabeth Lau, Yenupini Joyce Adams, Roya Ghiaseddin","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2024.2434907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To decrease the high rates of mental health-related maternal morbidity and mortality among rural-dwelling women, it is critical to identify those experiencing postpartum depression (PPD) and provide necessary follow-up care. To effectively screen for PPD, clinicians must utilize instruments which account for context-specific factors and maintain validity across diverse populations. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most commonly used depression screening tool in perinatal settings, but has not been validated for use within rural American settings. The aim of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of the EPDS and assess its validity for clinical use within a rural American context. In regards to construct validity, we found that a single-factor structure representing depression status was psychometrically sound and well explained by the items of the EPDS. The scale demonstrated strong criterion-related validity, where EPDS screening results were significantly correlated with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria used by providers to make differential depression diagnoses. The EPDS yielded acceptable reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) in measuring depression status among our rural-dwelling sample. This is the first study establishing validity of a PPD screening tool within a rural U.S. population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":"46 1","pages":"83-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Among Rural-Dwelling U.S. Women.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Lau, Yenupini Joyce Adams, Roya Ghiaseddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01612840.2024.2434907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To decrease the high rates of mental health-related maternal morbidity and mortality among rural-dwelling women, it is critical to identify those experiencing postpartum depression (PPD) and provide necessary follow-up care. To effectively screen for PPD, clinicians must utilize instruments which account for context-specific factors and maintain validity across diverse populations. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most commonly used depression screening tool in perinatal settings, but has not been validated for use within rural American settings. The aim of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of the EPDS and assess its validity for clinical use within a rural American context. In regards to construct validity, we found that a single-factor structure representing depression status was psychometrically sound and well explained by the items of the EPDS. The scale demonstrated strong criterion-related validity, where EPDS screening results were significantly correlated with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria used by providers to make differential depression diagnoses. The EPDS yielded acceptable reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) in measuring depression status among our rural-dwelling sample. This is the first study establishing validity of a PPD screening tool within a rural U.S. population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"83-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2434907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2434907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了降低农村妇女中与精神健康相关的孕产妇发病率和死亡率,确定产后抑郁症患者并提供必要的后续护理至关重要。为了有效地筛查PPD,临床医生必须使用能够考虑特定环境因素的工具,并在不同人群中保持有效性。爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)是围产期最常用的抑郁筛查工具,但尚未在美国农村地区得到验证。本研究的目的是建立EPDS的心理测量特性,并评估其在美国农村地区临床应用的有效性。在构念效度方面,我们发现表征抑郁状态的单因素结构在心理测量学上是健全的,并被EPDS的项目很好地解释。该量表显示出很强的标准相关效度,其中EPDS筛查结果与精神障碍诊断与统计手册(DSM-5)标准显著相关,这些标准被提供者用于鉴别抑郁症诊断。EPDS在测量农村居民的抑郁状况时获得了可接受的信度和内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90)。这是第一个在美国农村人口中建立PPD筛查工具有效性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Among Rural-Dwelling U.S. Women.

To decrease the high rates of mental health-related maternal morbidity and mortality among rural-dwelling women, it is critical to identify those experiencing postpartum depression (PPD) and provide necessary follow-up care. To effectively screen for PPD, clinicians must utilize instruments which account for context-specific factors and maintain validity across diverse populations. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most commonly used depression screening tool in perinatal settings, but has not been validated for use within rural American settings. The aim of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of the EPDS and assess its validity for clinical use within a rural American context. In regards to construct validity, we found that a single-factor structure representing depression status was psychometrically sound and well explained by the items of the EPDS. The scale demonstrated strong criterion-related validity, where EPDS screening results were significantly correlated with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria used by providers to make differential depression diagnoses. The EPDS yielded acceptable reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) in measuring depression status among our rural-dwelling sample. This is the first study establishing validity of a PPD screening tool within a rural U.S. population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信