{"title":"胆汁酸和氨基酸在鉴别急性冠状动脉综合征中的诊断价值。","authors":"Qian Yu, Furong Zhao, Shuang Wang, Xingwang Jia, Shuang Shen, Xiaofeng Zhao, Ying Li, Jiaolei Song, Miao Sun, Xin Liu, Zhining Liu","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S499046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), comprising unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction, is the most dangerous and fatal form of coronary heart disease. This study evaluates serum bile acids (BAs) and amino acids (AAs) as potential predictors of AMI in UA patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 72 Non-Coronary Artery Disease (NCAD) patients, 157 UA patients, and 79 AMI patients were analyzed. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measured 15 bile acids and 19 amino acids. The data was split into training and validation sets (7:3). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Diagnostic value and clinical benefits were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis, and metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of serum BAs and AAs effectively differentiated NCAD, UA, and AMI groups. The differences in serum BA and AA profiles between UA and AMI patients were primarily driven by four metabolites: deoxycholic acid (DCA), histidine (His), lysine (Lys), and phenylalanine (Phe). Together, they had an AUC of 0.830 (0.768 in the validation cohort) for predicting AMI in UA patients. After adjusting for multiple confounding factors, DCA, His, Lys, and Phe were independent predictors distinguishing UA from AMI. The results of AUC, IDI, and NRI showed that adding these four biomarkers to a model with clinical variables significantly improved predictive value, which was confirmed in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the association of DCA, His, Lys, and Phe with AMI, suggesting their potential role in AMI pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"179-189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagnostic Value of Bile Acids and Amino Acids in Differentiating Acute Coronary Syndromes.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Yu, Furong Zhao, Shuang Wang, Xingwang Jia, Shuang Shen, Xiaofeng Zhao, Ying Li, Jiaolei Song, Miao Sun, Xin Liu, Zhining Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S499046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), comprising unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction, is the most dangerous and fatal form of coronary heart disease. This study evaluates serum bile acids (BAs) and amino acids (AAs) as potential predictors of AMI in UA patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 72 Non-Coronary Artery Disease (NCAD) patients, 157 UA patients, and 79 AMI patients were analyzed. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measured 15 bile acids and 19 amino acids. The data was split into training and validation sets (7:3). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Diagnostic value and clinical benefits were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis, and metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of serum BAs and AAs effectively differentiated NCAD, UA, and AMI groups. The differences in serum BA and AA profiles between UA and AMI patients were primarily driven by four metabolites: deoxycholic acid (DCA), histidine (His), lysine (Lys), and phenylalanine (Phe). Together, they had an AUC of 0.830 (0.768 in the validation cohort) for predicting AMI in UA patients. After adjusting for multiple confounding factors, DCA, His, Lys, and Phe were independent predictors distinguishing UA from AMI. The results of AUC, IDI, and NRI showed that adding these four biomarkers to a model with clinical variables significantly improved predictive value, which was confirmed in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the association of DCA, His, Lys, and Phe with AMI, suggesting their potential role in AMI pathogenesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"179-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S499046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S499046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Diagnostic Value of Bile Acids and Amino Acids in Differentiating Acute Coronary Syndromes.
Purpose: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), comprising unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction, is the most dangerous and fatal form of coronary heart disease. This study evaluates serum bile acids (BAs) and amino acids (AAs) as potential predictors of AMI in UA patients.
Patients and methods: A total of 72 Non-Coronary Artery Disease (NCAD) patients, 157 UA patients, and 79 AMI patients were analyzed. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measured 15 bile acids and 19 amino acids. The data was split into training and validation sets (7:3). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Diagnostic value and clinical benefits were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis, and metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification improvement (NRI).
Results: Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of serum BAs and AAs effectively differentiated NCAD, UA, and AMI groups. The differences in serum BA and AA profiles between UA and AMI patients were primarily driven by four metabolites: deoxycholic acid (DCA), histidine (His), lysine (Lys), and phenylalanine (Phe). Together, they had an AUC of 0.830 (0.768 in the validation cohort) for predicting AMI in UA patients. After adjusting for multiple confounding factors, DCA, His, Lys, and Phe were independent predictors distinguishing UA from AMI. The results of AUC, IDI, and NRI showed that adding these four biomarkers to a model with clinical variables significantly improved predictive value, which was confirmed in the validation cohort.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the association of DCA, His, Lys, and Phe with AMI, suggesting their potential role in AMI pathogenesis.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.