改变循环曲柄功率和节奏对肌肉能量学和活跃肌肉体积影响的计算机研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112530
Cristian D Riveros-Matthey, Timothy J Carroll, Mark J Connick, Glen A Lichtwark
{"title":"改变循环曲柄功率和节奏对肌肉能量学和活跃肌肉体积影响的计算机研究。","authors":"Cristian D Riveros-Matthey, Timothy J Carroll, Mark J Connick, Glen A Lichtwark","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study used musculoskeletal modelling to explore the relationship between cycling conditions (power output and cadence) and muscle activation and metabolic power. We hypothesized that the cadence that minimized the simulated average active muscle volume would be higher than the cadence that minimized the simulated metabolic power. We validated the simulation by comparing the predicted muscle activation and fascicle velocities with experimental electromyography and ultrasound images. We found strong correlations for averaged muscle activations and moderate to good correlations for fascicle dynamics. These correlations tended to weaken when analyzed at the individual participant level. Our study revealed a curvilinear relationship between the average active muscle volume and cadence, with the minimum active volume being aligned to the self-selected cadence. The simulated metabolic power was consistent with previous results and was minimized at lower cadences than that which minimized active muscle volume across power outputs. Although there are some limitations to the musculoskeletal modelling approach, the findings suggest that minimizing active muscle volume may be a more important factor than minimizing metabolic power for self-selected cycling cadence preferences. Further research is warranted to explore the potential of an active muscle volume-based objective function for control schemes across a wider range of cycling conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"180 ","pages":"112530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An in-silico investigation of the effect of changing cycling crank power and cadence on muscle energetics and active muscle volume.\",\"authors\":\"Cristian D Riveros-Matthey, Timothy J Carroll, Mark J Connick, Glen A Lichtwark\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study used musculoskeletal modelling to explore the relationship between cycling conditions (power output and cadence) and muscle activation and metabolic power. We hypothesized that the cadence that minimized the simulated average active muscle volume would be higher than the cadence that minimized the simulated metabolic power. We validated the simulation by comparing the predicted muscle activation and fascicle velocities with experimental electromyography and ultrasound images. We found strong correlations for averaged muscle activations and moderate to good correlations for fascicle dynamics. These correlations tended to weaken when analyzed at the individual participant level. Our study revealed a curvilinear relationship between the average active muscle volume and cadence, with the minimum active volume being aligned to the self-selected cadence. The simulated metabolic power was consistent with previous results and was minimized at lower cadences than that which minimized active muscle volume across power outputs. Although there are some limitations to the musculoskeletal modelling approach, the findings suggest that minimizing active muscle volume may be a more important factor than minimizing metabolic power for self-selected cycling cadence preferences. Further research is warranted to explore the potential of an active muscle volume-based objective function for control schemes across a wider range of cycling conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"112530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用肌肉骨骼模型来探索循环条件(功率输出和节奏)与肌肉激活和代谢能力之间的关系。我们假设最小化模拟平均活跃肌肉量的节奏将高于最小化模拟代谢能力的节奏。我们通过将预测的肌肉激活和肌束速度与实验肌电图和超声图像进行比较来验证模拟。我们发现平均肌肉激活的强相关性和束动力的中等到良好的相关性。当分析个体参与者水平时,这些相关性趋于减弱。我们的研究揭示了平均活动肌肉量与节奏之间的曲线关系,最小活动肌肉量与自我选择的节奏一致。模拟的代谢能力与先前的结果一致,并且在较低的节奏下最小化,而不是在功率输出中最小化活动肌肉量。尽管肌肉骨骼建模方法存在一些局限性,但研究结果表明,对于自我选择的骑行节奏偏好,最小化活动肌肉体积可能比最小化代谢能力更重要。进一步的研究是有必要的,以探索在更广泛的循环条件下控制方案的基于活动肌肉体积的目标函数的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An in-silico investigation of the effect of changing cycling crank power and cadence on muscle energetics and active muscle volume.

This study used musculoskeletal modelling to explore the relationship between cycling conditions (power output and cadence) and muscle activation and metabolic power. We hypothesized that the cadence that minimized the simulated average active muscle volume would be higher than the cadence that minimized the simulated metabolic power. We validated the simulation by comparing the predicted muscle activation and fascicle velocities with experimental electromyography and ultrasound images. We found strong correlations for averaged muscle activations and moderate to good correlations for fascicle dynamics. These correlations tended to weaken when analyzed at the individual participant level. Our study revealed a curvilinear relationship between the average active muscle volume and cadence, with the minimum active volume being aligned to the self-selected cadence. The simulated metabolic power was consistent with previous results and was minimized at lower cadences than that which minimized active muscle volume across power outputs. Although there are some limitations to the musculoskeletal modelling approach, the findings suggest that minimizing active muscle volume may be a more important factor than minimizing metabolic power for self-selected cycling cadence preferences. Further research is warranted to explore the potential of an active muscle volume-based objective function for control schemes across a wider range of cycling conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信