父母在新生儿重症监护病房为婴儿提供疼痛护理的意图和要求。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1512917
Aya Shimizu, Takeshi Arimitsu, Kana Harada, Mio Ozawa
{"title":"父母在新生儿重症监护病房为婴儿提供疼痛护理的意图和要求。","authors":"Aya Shimizu, Takeshi Arimitsu, Kana Harada, Mio Ozawa","doi":"10.3389/fped.2024.1512917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Japan Association of Neonatal Nursing evaluated the pain care provided by parents to their infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, further collaborations with families based on family-centered care are necessary to clarify the parental intentions and requests regarding pain care for their infants. This study aimed to describe the experiences and content of nonpharmacological pain care provided by parents to their infants, the intentions and requests of parents regarding each type of recommended pain care (irrespective of whether they had provided pain care at the NICU), and the reasons for their hesitation to implement specific pain management methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 parents with NICU-hospitalized infants, including 66 (65.6%) infants with a birth weight of <1,000 g, voluntarily responded to an anonymous self-administered online electronic survey. Sociodemographic and clinical data were quantitatively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study population, 30.6% (<i>N</i> = 33) had provided pain care to their infants, 56.5% (<i>N</i> = 61) hoped to provide pain care in the future, and 40.7% (<i>N</i> = 44) expected advice for pain care options from healthcare professionals (HCPs). Swaddling, facilitated tucking, and skin-to-skin contact were the most popular options (≥60%). By contrast, the use of sucrose and breastfeeding (both 13.0%), skin-to-skin contact (7%), and use of expressed breast milk and non-nutritive sucking (both 3.7%) were less frequently used due to indifference or doubts, lack of knowledge about pain care, differences between recommended pain care methods and parental values, and pain care methods being inappropriate for the child's condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey demonstrated that when parents provide pain care for their children in the NICU, they are required to make choices based on the advice and knowledge offered by HCPs, taking into account the diverse values of parents as well as the overall condition of their infant and their breastfeeding status. Therefore, we suggest that HCPs support parents in choosing not only the recommended care but also the most appropriate pain care for the condition of their infant.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"12 ","pages":"1512917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental intentions and requests to provide pain care for their infants in neonatal intensive care units.\",\"authors\":\"Aya Shimizu, Takeshi Arimitsu, Kana Harada, Mio Ozawa\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fped.2024.1512917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Japan Association of Neonatal Nursing evaluated the pain care provided by parents to their infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, further collaborations with families based on family-centered care are necessary to clarify the parental intentions and requests regarding pain care for their infants. This study aimed to describe the experiences and content of nonpharmacological pain care provided by parents to their infants, the intentions and requests of parents regarding each type of recommended pain care (irrespective of whether they had provided pain care at the NICU), and the reasons for their hesitation to implement specific pain management methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 parents with NICU-hospitalized infants, including 66 (65.6%) infants with a birth weight of <1,000 g, voluntarily responded to an anonymous self-administered online electronic survey. Sociodemographic and clinical data were quantitatively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study population, 30.6% (<i>N</i> = 33) had provided pain care to their infants, 56.5% (<i>N</i> = 61) hoped to provide pain care in the future, and 40.7% (<i>N</i> = 44) expected advice for pain care options from healthcare professionals (HCPs). Swaddling, facilitated tucking, and skin-to-skin contact were the most popular options (≥60%). By contrast, the use of sucrose and breastfeeding (both 13.0%), skin-to-skin contact (7%), and use of expressed breast milk and non-nutritive sucking (both 3.7%) were less frequently used due to indifference or doubts, lack of knowledge about pain care, differences between recommended pain care methods and parental values, and pain care methods being inappropriate for the child's condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey demonstrated that when parents provide pain care for their children in the NICU, they are required to make choices based on the advice and knowledge offered by HCPs, taking into account the diverse values of parents as well as the overall condition of their infant and their breastfeeding status. Therefore, we suggest that HCPs support parents in choosing not only the recommended care but also the most appropriate pain care for the condition of their infant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1512917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739164/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1512917\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1512917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:日本新生儿护理协会评估父母为新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的婴儿提供的疼痛护理。然而,在以家庭为中心的护理基础上,进一步与家庭合作是必要的,以澄清父母对其婴儿疼痛护理的意图和要求。本研究旨在描述父母对婴儿进行非药物疼痛护理的经历和内容,父母对每种推荐的疼痛护理的意图和要求(无论他们是否在NICU提供过疼痛护理),以及他们对实施特定疼痛管理方法犹豫不决的原因。结果:在我们的研究人群中,30.6% (N = 33)的父母为他们的婴儿提供了疼痛护理,56.5% (N = 61)的人希望将来提供疼痛护理,40.7% (N = 44)的人希望得到医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的疼痛护理建议。襁褓、方便收纳和皮肤接触是最受欢迎的选择(≥60%)。相比之下,使用蔗糖和母乳喂养(均为13.0%),皮肤接触(7%),以及使用母乳和非营养性吸吮(均为3.7%)的使用频率较低,原因是漠不关心或怀疑,缺乏对疼痛护理的知识,推荐的疼痛护理方法与父母价值观存在差异,以及疼痛护理方法不适合儿童的情况。结论:本调查表明,父母在NICU为孩子提供疼痛护理时,应根据医护人员提供的建议和知识,考虑父母的不同价值观,以及婴儿的整体情况和母乳喂养状况,做出选择。因此,我们建议HCPs不仅支持父母选择推荐的护理,还支持父母根据婴儿的情况选择最合适的疼痛护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parental intentions and requests to provide pain care for their infants in neonatal intensive care units.

Purpose: The Japan Association of Neonatal Nursing evaluated the pain care provided by parents to their infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). However, further collaborations with families based on family-centered care are necessary to clarify the parental intentions and requests regarding pain care for their infants. This study aimed to describe the experiences and content of nonpharmacological pain care provided by parents to their infants, the intentions and requests of parents regarding each type of recommended pain care (irrespective of whether they had provided pain care at the NICU), and the reasons for their hesitation to implement specific pain management methods.

Methods: A total of 108 parents with NICU-hospitalized infants, including 66 (65.6%) infants with a birth weight of <1,000 g, voluntarily responded to an anonymous self-administered online electronic survey. Sociodemographic and clinical data were quantitatively analyzed.

Results: In our study population, 30.6% (N = 33) had provided pain care to their infants, 56.5% (N = 61) hoped to provide pain care in the future, and 40.7% (N = 44) expected advice for pain care options from healthcare professionals (HCPs). Swaddling, facilitated tucking, and skin-to-skin contact were the most popular options (≥60%). By contrast, the use of sucrose and breastfeeding (both 13.0%), skin-to-skin contact (7%), and use of expressed breast milk and non-nutritive sucking (both 3.7%) were less frequently used due to indifference or doubts, lack of knowledge about pain care, differences between recommended pain care methods and parental values, and pain care methods being inappropriate for the child's condition.

Conclusions: This survey demonstrated that when parents provide pain care for their children in the NICU, they are required to make choices based on the advice and knowledge offered by HCPs, taking into account the diverse values of parents as well as the overall condition of their infant and their breastfeeding status. Therefore, we suggest that HCPs support parents in choosing not only the recommended care but also the most appropriate pain care for the condition of their infant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信