密闭空间的步态速度评估:开发一种新的自动化4米静态启动测试,以测量动态启动的步态速度。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yong-Hao Pua PhD, Ross Allan Clark PhD, Laura Tay MD, Yee-Sien Ng MD, Jaylyn Tze-Theng Poh BSc, Salma Bte Md Ibrahim Dip, Wai-Chye Cheong PhD, Hong-Han Tan BSc, Julian Thumboo MD
{"title":"密闭空间的步态速度评估:开发一种新的自动化4米静态启动测试,以测量动态启动的步态速度。","authors":"Yong-Hao Pua PhD,&nbsp;Ross Allan Clark PhD,&nbsp;Laura Tay MD,&nbsp;Yee-Sien Ng MD,&nbsp;Jaylyn Tze-Theng Poh BSc,&nbsp;Salma Bte Md Ibrahim Dip,&nbsp;Wai-Chye Cheong PhD,&nbsp;Hong-Han Tan BSc,&nbsp;Julian Thumboo MD","doi":"10.1111/ggi.15077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To promote standardization and feasible measurements of gait speed across the field, we developed a device that used light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology to measure gait speed from a standing-start testing procedure conducted on a 4-m total walkway. We compared this automated (LiDAR-based) standing-start 4-m gait speed test (AS-4MG) with automated and manual (stopwatch-based) dynamic-start 4-m gait speed tests (AD-4MG and MD-4MG, respectively) on between-method agreement, measurement repeatability, and predictive validity with functional outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of 48 community-dwelling adults (mean [SD], 69 [9] years) participated in this method comparison study. Participants completed a survey and a physical function assessment, from which self-reported stair difficulty, handgrip strength, sit-to-stand performance, and gait speed (AS-, AD-, and MD-4MG) were measured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mean AS-4MG, AD-4MG, and MD-4MG were 1.12, 1.13, and 1.14 m/s, respectively, with a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.94) and no systematic bias observed between AS-4MG and the referent AD-4MG. In the analyses of repeated gait measurements, coefficients of repeatability were &lt;0.20 m/s for the automated tests (0.16 and 0.18 m/s for AS-4MG and AD-4MG, respectively) but not for MD-4MG (0.22 m/s). Correlations between gait speed and functional measures ranged between 0.44 and 0.68 (<i>P</i>s &lt; 0.01). Correlations for the automated tests were comparable, while AS-4MG correlations tended to exceed MD-4MG correlations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In community-dwelling adults, the AS-4MG test was unbiased when compared with the AD-4MG, encompassing a 9-m walkway, with both tests showing equivalence of measurement repeatability and predictive validity. The AS-4MG potentially allows gait measurements in confined spaces (e.g., doctor's office) where the gait speed test was previously unfeasible. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 449–453</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"25 3","pages":"449-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait speed assessment in confined spaces: Development of a novel automated 4-m static-start test to measure dynamic-start gait speed\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Hao Pua PhD,&nbsp;Ross Allan Clark PhD,&nbsp;Laura Tay MD,&nbsp;Yee-Sien Ng MD,&nbsp;Jaylyn Tze-Theng Poh BSc,&nbsp;Salma Bte Md Ibrahim Dip,&nbsp;Wai-Chye Cheong PhD,&nbsp;Hong-Han Tan BSc,&nbsp;Julian Thumboo MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.15077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To promote standardization and feasible measurements of gait speed across the field, we developed a device that used light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology to measure gait speed from a standing-start testing procedure conducted on a 4-m total walkway. We compared this automated (LiDAR-based) standing-start 4-m gait speed test (AS-4MG) with automated and manual (stopwatch-based) dynamic-start 4-m gait speed tests (AD-4MG and MD-4MG, respectively) on between-method agreement, measurement repeatability, and predictive validity with functional outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sample of 48 community-dwelling adults (mean [SD], 69 [9] years) participated in this method comparison study. Participants completed a survey and a physical function assessment, from which self-reported stair difficulty, handgrip strength, sit-to-stand performance, and gait speed (AS-, AD-, and MD-4MG) were measured.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mean AS-4MG, AD-4MG, and MD-4MG were 1.12, 1.13, and 1.14 m/s, respectively, with a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.94) and no systematic bias observed between AS-4MG and the referent AD-4MG. In the analyses of repeated gait measurements, coefficients of repeatability were &lt;0.20 m/s for the automated tests (0.16 and 0.18 m/s for AS-4MG and AD-4MG, respectively) but not for MD-4MG (0.22 m/s). Correlations between gait speed and functional measures ranged between 0.44 and 0.68 (<i>P</i>s &lt; 0.01). Correlations for the automated tests were comparable, while AS-4MG correlations tended to exceed MD-4MG correlations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In community-dwelling adults, the AS-4MG test was unbiased when compared with the AD-4MG, encompassing a 9-m walkway, with both tests showing equivalence of measurement repeatability and predictive validity. The AS-4MG potentially allows gait measurements in confined spaces (e.g., doctor's office) where the gait speed test was previously unfeasible. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 449–453</b>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"449-453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.15077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.15077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了促进整个领域的标准化和可行的步态速度测量,我们开发了一种设备,该设备使用光探测和测距(LiDAR)技术从站立启动测试程序中测量步态速度,该测试程序在4米的总人行道上进行。我们将自动(基于激光雷达的)站立启动4米步态速度测试(AS-4MG)与自动和手动(基于秒表的)动态启动4米步态速度测试(分别为AD-4MG和MD-4MG)在方法间一致性、测量可重复性和预测有效性方面与功能结果进行了比较。方法:选取48名社区居民(平均[SD] 69岁)进行方法比较研究。参与者完成了一项调查和身体功能评估,从中测量了自我报告的楼梯难度、握力、坐立表现和步态速度(AS-、AD-和MD-4MG)。结果:平均AS-4MG、AD-4MG和MD-4MG分别为1.12、1.13和1.14 m/s,具有强相关性(r = 0.94), AS-4MG与参考AD-4MG之间无系统偏倚。结论:在社区居住的成年人中,AS-4MG测试与AD-4MG测试相比是无偏的,包括9米的人行道,两个测试显示测量的重复性和预测效度相等。AS-4MG可能允许在狭窄空间(例如,医生办公室)进行步态测量,而步态速度测试以前是不可行的。Geriatr Gerontol 2025;••: ••-••.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gait speed assessment in confined spaces: Development of a novel automated 4-m static-start test to measure dynamic-start gait speed

Gait speed assessment in confined spaces: Development of a novel automated 4-m static-start test to measure dynamic-start gait speed

Objectives

To promote standardization and feasible measurements of gait speed across the field, we developed a device that used light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology to measure gait speed from a standing-start testing procedure conducted on a 4-m total walkway. We compared this automated (LiDAR-based) standing-start 4-m gait speed test (AS-4MG) with automated and manual (stopwatch-based) dynamic-start 4-m gait speed tests (AD-4MG and MD-4MG, respectively) on between-method agreement, measurement repeatability, and predictive validity with functional outcomes.

Methods

A sample of 48 community-dwelling adults (mean [SD], 69 [9] years) participated in this method comparison study. Participants completed a survey and a physical function assessment, from which self-reported stair difficulty, handgrip strength, sit-to-stand performance, and gait speed (AS-, AD-, and MD-4MG) were measured.

Results

Mean AS-4MG, AD-4MG, and MD-4MG were 1.12, 1.13, and 1.14 m/s, respectively, with a strong correlation (r = 0.94) and no systematic bias observed between AS-4MG and the referent AD-4MG. In the analyses of repeated gait measurements, coefficients of repeatability were <0.20 m/s for the automated tests (0.16 and 0.18 m/s for AS-4MG and AD-4MG, respectively) but not for MD-4MG (0.22 m/s). Correlations between gait speed and functional measures ranged between 0.44 and 0.68 (Ps < 0.01). Correlations for the automated tests were comparable, while AS-4MG correlations tended to exceed MD-4MG correlations.

Conclusions

In community-dwelling adults, the AS-4MG test was unbiased when compared with the AD-4MG, encompassing a 9-m walkway, with both tests showing equivalence of measurement repeatability and predictive validity. The AS-4MG potentially allows gait measurements in confined spaces (e.g., doctor's office) where the gait speed test was previously unfeasible. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 449–453.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信