Ming Sun, Hai-Rui Liang, He Zhang, Tong Bai, Rong-Da Xu, Si-Yu Duan, Zhen-Cun Cai
{"title":"65岁以上老年人Evans-Jensen IV型股骨粗隆间骨折的手术选择:全髋关节置换术与股骨近端钉抗旋的比较","authors":"Ming Sun, Hai-Rui Liang, He Zhang, Tong Bai, Rong-Da Xu, Si-Yu Duan, Zhen-Cun Cai","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1510094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no clear standard for the surgical options for Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients over 65 years old. This study aims to retrospectively analyze and compare the early postoperative limb function and quality of life of patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for this type of fracture. We hypothesize that there is no significant difference in complications and postoperative recovery between the two surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures who were treated between 2020 and 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: the PFNA group (20 cases) and the THA group (20 cases). General patient information, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative mobilization, time to weight-bearing on the affected limb, Harris hip scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, excellent and good rates, SF-36 scores, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the PFNA group, the THA group had a longer operative time (86.7 ± 9.6 vs. 51.5 ± 5.3 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and more intraoperative blood loss (212.0 ± 35.5 vs. 76.5 ± 16.1 ml, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the THA group had an earlier time to first postoperative mobilization (3.1 ± 1.4 vs. 43.3 ± 13.09 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and earlier time to full weight-bearing on the affected limb (33.5 ± 3.1 vs. 77.9 ± 12.0 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The Harris hip scores and SF-36 scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were higher in the THA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For elderly patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures, especially those with underlying diseases who cannot tolerate prolonged bed rest, hip replacement surgery (THA) may be preferred. Postoperative patients can begin rehabilitation exercises earlier, preventing the exacerbation of internal medical conditions. Early recovery of hip function on the affected side is faster, and the quality of life of patients is higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1510094"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical options for Evans-Jensen type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly over 65: a comparison between total hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail antirotation.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Sun, Hai-Rui Liang, He Zhang, Tong Bai, Rong-Da Xu, Si-Yu Duan, Zhen-Cun Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1510094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no clear standard for the surgical options for Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients over 65 years old. This study aims to retrospectively analyze and compare the early postoperative limb function and quality of life of patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for this type of fracture. We hypothesize that there is no significant difference in complications and postoperative recovery between the two surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures who were treated between 2020 and 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: the PFNA group (20 cases) and the THA group (20 cases). General patient information, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative mobilization, time to weight-bearing on the affected limb, Harris hip scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, excellent and good rates, SF-36 scores, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the PFNA group, the THA group had a longer operative time (86.7 ± 9.6 vs. 51.5 ± 5.3 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and more intraoperative blood loss (212.0 ± 35.5 vs. 76.5 ± 16.1 ml, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the THA group had an earlier time to first postoperative mobilization (3.1 ± 1.4 vs. 43.3 ± 13.09 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and earlier time to full weight-bearing on the affected limb (33.5 ± 3.1 vs. 77.9 ± 12.0 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The Harris hip scores and SF-36 scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were higher in the THA group (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For elderly patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures, especially those with underlying diseases who cannot tolerate prolonged bed rest, hip replacement surgery (THA) may be preferred. Postoperative patients can begin rehabilitation exercises earlier, preventing the exacerbation of internal medical conditions. Early recovery of hip function on the affected side is faster, and the quality of life of patients is higher.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1510094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1510094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1510094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前,对于65岁以上老年患者Evans-Jensen IV型股骨粗隆间骨折的手术选择尚无明确的标准。本研究旨在回顾性分析和比较全髋关节置换术(THA)和股骨近端钉固定术(PFNA)治疗该类骨折患者术后早期肢体功能和生活质量。我们假设两种手术方式在并发症和术后恢复方面没有显著差异。方法:回顾性分析2020 - 2023年间65岁以上的Evans-Jensen IV型股骨粗隆间骨折患者。根据治疗方法将患者分为两组:PFNA组(20例)和THA组(20例)。记录患者一般信息、手术时间、术中出血量、术后活动时间、患肢负重时间、术后1、3、6个月Harris髋关节评分、优良率、SF-36评分、术后并发症。结果:与PFNA组相比,THA组手术时间更长(86.7±9.6 vs 51.5±5.3 min, p p p p p = 0.41)。结论:对于65岁以上的老年Evans-Jensen IV型股骨粗隆间骨折患者,特别是有基础疾病且无法忍受长时间卧床休息的患者,髋关节置换术(THA)可能是首选。术后患者可以更早开始康复训练,防止内部医疗条件恶化。患侧髋关节功能早期恢复较快,患者生活质量较高。
Surgical options for Evans-Jensen type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly over 65: a comparison between total hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail antirotation.
Background: Currently, there is no clear standard for the surgical options for Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients over 65 years old. This study aims to retrospectively analyze and compare the early postoperative limb function and quality of life of patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for this type of fracture. We hypothesize that there is no significant difference in complications and postoperative recovery between the two surgical methods.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures who were treated between 2020 and 2023. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: the PFNA group (20 cases) and the THA group (20 cases). General patient information, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative mobilization, time to weight-bearing on the affected limb, Harris hip scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, excellent and good rates, SF-36 scores, and postoperative complications were recorded.
Results: Compared to the PFNA group, the THA group had a longer operative time (86.7 ± 9.6 vs. 51.5 ± 5.3 min, p < 0.001) and more intraoperative blood loss (212.0 ± 35.5 vs. 76.5 ± 16.1 ml, p < 0.001). However, the THA group had an earlier time to first postoperative mobilization (3.1 ± 1.4 vs. 43.3 ± 13.09 days, p < 0.001) and earlier time to full weight-bearing on the affected limb (33.5 ± 3.1 vs. 77.9 ± 12.0 days, p < 0.001). The Harris hip scores and SF-36 scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were higher in the THA group (p < 0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (p = 0.41).
Conclusion: For elderly patients over 65 years old with Evans-Jensen Type IV intertrochanteric femur fractures, especially those with underlying diseases who cannot tolerate prolonged bed rest, hip replacement surgery (THA) may be preferred. Postoperative patients can begin rehabilitation exercises earlier, preventing the exacerbation of internal medical conditions. Early recovery of hip function on the affected side is faster, and the quality of life of patients is higher.
期刊介绍:
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.