与微血管减压相比,经皮球囊减压是治疗原发性三叉神经痛的更好选择?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1517064
Yuwei Shi, Wenhu Liu, Shaopeng Peng, Jianxiong Liu
{"title":"与微血管减压相比,经皮球囊减压是治疗原发性三叉神经痛的更好选择?","authors":"Yuwei Shi, Wenhu Liu, Shaopeng Peng, Jianxiong Liu","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1517064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Demonstrate the superiority of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN) compared to trigeminal microvascular decompression (MVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data, including immediate, short-term, and long-term pain relief, complications, duration of the operation, and postoperative hospital stay, were retrospectively analyzed for 114 patients diagnosed with PTN who were treated with either PBC or MVD between January 2018 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences observed in the pain relief rates between the two surgical methods at 24 h postoperatively (MVD: 91.07%, PBC: 96.55%), at 6 months postoperatively (MVD: 87.5%, PBC: 94.8%), at 1 year postoperatively (MVD: 83.90%, PBC: 94.80%), and at 2 years postoperatively (MVD: 78.60%, PBC: 72.40%). However, the incidence of meningitis following MVD was significantly higher than that following PBC (<i>P</i> < 0.005). Additionally, both the duration of the operation and the length of the postoperative hospital stay in the MVD group were longer than those in the PBC group (<i>P</i> < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBC demonstrates efficacy comparable to MVD while offering a simpler procedure, improved safety, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. Therefore, it may serve as a viable alternative to MVD and could become the preferred surgical approach for treating PTN in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1517064"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous ballon compression, a better choice for primary trigeminal neuralgia compared to microvascular decompression?\",\"authors\":\"Yuwei Shi, Wenhu Liu, Shaopeng Peng, Jianxiong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1517064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Demonstrate the superiority of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN) compared to trigeminal microvascular decompression (MVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data, including immediate, short-term, and long-term pain relief, complications, duration of the operation, and postoperative hospital stay, were retrospectively analyzed for 114 patients diagnosed with PTN who were treated with either PBC or MVD between January 2018 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences observed in the pain relief rates between the two surgical methods at 24 h postoperatively (MVD: 91.07%, PBC: 96.55%), at 6 months postoperatively (MVD: 87.5%, PBC: 94.8%), at 1 year postoperatively (MVD: 83.90%, PBC: 94.80%), and at 2 years postoperatively (MVD: 78.60%, PBC: 72.40%). However, the incidence of meningitis following MVD was significantly higher than that following PBC (<i>P</i> < 0.005). Additionally, both the duration of the operation and the length of the postoperative hospital stay in the MVD group were longer than those in the PBC group (<i>P</i> < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBC demonstrates efficacy comparable to MVD while offering a simpler procedure, improved safety, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. Therefore, it may serve as a viable alternative to MVD and could become the preferred surgical approach for treating PTN in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1517064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1517064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1517064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨经皮球囊加压(PBC)治疗原发性三叉神经痛(PTN)的优越性,并与三叉微血管减压(MVD)进行比较。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年12月期间接受PBC或MVD治疗的114例确诊为PTN的患者的临床数据,包括即时、短期和长期疼痛缓解、并发症、手术时间和术后住院时间。结果:两种手术方式术后24 h (MVD: 91.07%, PBC: 96.55%)、术后6个月(MVD: 87.5%, PBC: 94.8%)、术后1年(MVD: 83.90%, PBC: 94.80%)、术后2年(MVD: 78.60%, PBC: 72.40%)疼痛缓解率差异无统计学意义。然而,MVD后的脑膜炎发生率明显高于PBC (P结论:PBC的疗效与MVD相当,同时手术更简单,安全性更高,术后住院时间更短。因此,它可以作为MVD的可行替代方案,并可能成为未来治疗PTN的首选手术入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous ballon compression, a better choice for primary trigeminal neuralgia compared to microvascular decompression?

Objective: Demonstrate the superiority of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN) compared to trigeminal microvascular decompression (MVD).

Methods: Clinical data, including immediate, short-term, and long-term pain relief, complications, duration of the operation, and postoperative hospital stay, were retrospectively analyzed for 114 patients diagnosed with PTN who were treated with either PBC or MVD between January 2018 and December 2021.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences observed in the pain relief rates between the two surgical methods at 24 h postoperatively (MVD: 91.07%, PBC: 96.55%), at 6 months postoperatively (MVD: 87.5%, PBC: 94.8%), at 1 year postoperatively (MVD: 83.90%, PBC: 94.80%), and at 2 years postoperatively (MVD: 78.60%, PBC: 72.40%). However, the incidence of meningitis following MVD was significantly higher than that following PBC (P < 0.005). Additionally, both the duration of the operation and the length of the postoperative hospital stay in the MVD group were longer than those in the PBC group (P < 0.005).

Conclusion: PBC demonstrates efficacy comparable to MVD while offering a simpler procedure, improved safety, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. Therefore, it may serve as a viable alternative to MVD and could become the preferred surgical approach for treating PTN in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信