社区居住的老年人身体虚弱状态与意外残疾轨迹的关联:一项纵向研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yuto Kiuchi, Kota Tsutsumimoto, Kazuhei Nishimoto, Yuka Misu, Shinnosuke Nosaka, Tomoka Ohata, Hyuma Makizako, Hiroyuki Shimada
{"title":"社区居住的老年人身体虚弱状态与意外残疾轨迹的关联:一项纵向研究。","authors":"Yuto Kiuchi, Kota Tsutsumimoto, Kazuhei Nishimoto, Yuka Misu, Shinnosuke Nosaka, Tomoka Ohata, Hyuma Makizako, Hiroyuki Shimada","doi":"10.1111/ggi.15063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Frailty is a mediator between robustness and functional disability. This study examined the association between remission of frailty and incident disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study analyzed longitudinal data from 2601 community-dwelling older adults who were aged ≥65 years (mean age 70.8 ± 4.5 years, 1307 women [50.2%]) using the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. Next, examining changes in status from wave 1 (2011) to wave 2 (2015), participants were categorized into a frailty group (those who remained or became frail), a remission of frailty group (those who were frail and became robust) and a robust group (those who remained robust). Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine the change of frailty status from wave 1 to wave 2, as well as incident disability at wave 2 (median duration 35 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those participants who started in the frailty or prefrailty groups at wave 1, 15.8% had an improved frailty status at the 47-month follow up. After adjusting for covariates at baseline, the Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that the hazard ratio of disability among participants who remained robust was significantly less than for those who were in the frailty group (hazard ratio 0.515; 95% confidence interval 0.333-0.796).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data confirm that among those whose frailty status improved, the risk of disability was lower than for those who remained frail. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of trajectories of physical frailty status and incident disability in community-dwelling older adults: A longitudinal study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuto Kiuchi, Kota Tsutsumimoto, Kazuhei Nishimoto, Yuka Misu, Shinnosuke Nosaka, Tomoka Ohata, Hyuma Makizako, Hiroyuki Shimada\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.15063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Frailty is a mediator between robustness and functional disability. This study examined the association between remission of frailty and incident disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study analyzed longitudinal data from 2601 community-dwelling older adults who were aged ≥65 years (mean age 70.8 ± 4.5 years, 1307 women [50.2%]) using the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. Next, examining changes in status from wave 1 (2011) to wave 2 (2015), participants were categorized into a frailty group (those who remained or became frail), a remission of frailty group (those who were frail and became robust) and a robust group (those who remained robust). Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine the change of frailty status from wave 1 to wave 2, as well as incident disability at wave 2 (median duration 35 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those participants who started in the frailty or prefrailty groups at wave 1, 15.8% had an improved frailty status at the 47-month follow up. After adjusting for covariates at baseline, the Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that the hazard ratio of disability among participants who remained robust was significantly less than for those who were in the frailty group (hazard ratio 0.515; 95% confidence interval 0.333-0.796).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data confirm that among those whose frailty status improved, the risk of disability was lower than for those who remained frail. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.15063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.15063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虚弱是健壮性和功能障碍之间的中介。本研究探讨了衰弱缓解与意外致残之间的关系。方法:本研究采用心血管健康研究标准,分析2601名≥65岁的社区居住老年人(平均年龄70.8±4.5岁,1307名女性[50.2%])的纵向数据。接下来,研究从第1波(2011年)到第2波(2015年)的状态变化,参与者被分为虚弱组(保持或变得虚弱的人)、虚弱缓解组(虚弱但变得强壮的人)和强壮组(保持强壮的人)。采用Cox比例风险模型来确定从第1波到第2波的虚弱状态的变化,以及第2波(中位持续时间35个月)的事件残疾。结果:在第1波开始虚弱或脆弱组的参与者中,15.8%的参与者在47个月的随访中虚弱状态有所改善。在基线调整协变量后,Cox比例风险回归模型显示,保持稳健性的参与者致残的风险比显著低于虚弱组(风险比0.515;95%置信区间0.333-0.796)。结论:我们的数据证实,在那些虚弱状态改善的人中,残疾的风险低于那些仍然虚弱的人。Geriatr Gerontol 2025;••: ••-••.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of trajectories of physical frailty status and incident disability in community-dwelling older adults: A longitudinal study.

Aim: Frailty is a mediator between robustness and functional disability. This study examined the association between remission of frailty and incident disability.

Methods: The present study analyzed longitudinal data from 2601 community-dwelling older adults who were aged ≥65 years (mean age 70.8 ± 4.5 years, 1307 women [50.2%]) using the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria. Next, examining changes in status from wave 1 (2011) to wave 2 (2015), participants were categorized into a frailty group (those who remained or became frail), a remission of frailty group (those who were frail and became robust) and a robust group (those who remained robust). Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine the change of frailty status from wave 1 to wave 2, as well as incident disability at wave 2 (median duration 35 months).

Results: Of those participants who started in the frailty or prefrailty groups at wave 1, 15.8% had an improved frailty status at the 47-month follow up. After adjusting for covariates at baseline, the Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that the hazard ratio of disability among participants who remained robust was significantly less than for those who were in the frailty group (hazard ratio 0.515; 95% confidence interval 0.333-0.796).

Conclusion: Our data confirm that among those whose frailty status improved, the risk of disability was lower than for those who remained frail. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; ••: ••-••.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信