Zhendong Gao, Yan Li, Jinjin Zhang, Liqiang Li, Tao Wang, Xiaolin Wang, Hao Wang
{"title":"限制血流的有氧训练对年轻人有氧能力、肌肉力量和肥厚的影响：一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Zhendong Gao, Yan Li, Jinjin Zhang, Liqiang Li, Tao Wang, Xiaolin Wang, Hao Wang","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1506386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aerobic training with blood flow restriction (AT-BFR) has shown promise in enhancing both aerobic capacity and exercise performance. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze the evidence regarding the effectiveness of this novel training method on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and hypertrophy in young adults. Studies were identified through a search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. A total of 16 studies, involving 270 subjects, were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that AT-BFR induced greater improvements in VO<sub>2max</sub> (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI: [0.02, 0.52], <i>p</i> < 0.05), and muscle strength (SMD = 0.39, 95%CI: [0.09, 0.69], <i>p</i> < 0.05), compared to aerobic training with no blood flow restriction (AT-noBFR). However, no significant effect was observed on muscle mass (SMD = 0.23, 95%CI: [-0.09, 0.56], <i>p</i> = 0.162). Furthermore, no moderating effects on the outcomes were found for individual characteristics or training factors. In conclusion, AT-BFR is more effective than AT-noBFR in improving aerobic capacity and muscle strength, making it a promising alternative to high-intensity training.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024559872.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1506386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of aerobic training with blood flow restriction on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and hypertrophy in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhendong Gao, Yan Li, Jinjin Zhang, Liqiang Li, Tao Wang, Xiaolin Wang, Hao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2024.1506386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aerobic training with blood flow restriction (AT-BFR) has shown promise in enhancing both aerobic capacity and exercise performance. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze the evidence regarding the effectiveness of this novel training method on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and hypertrophy in young adults. Studies were identified through a search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. A total of 16 studies, involving 270 subjects, were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that AT-BFR induced greater improvements in VO<sub>2max</sub> (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI: [0.02, 0.52], <i>p</i> < 0.05), and muscle strength (SMD = 0.39, 95%CI: [0.09, 0.69], <i>p</i> < 0.05), compared to aerobic training with no blood flow restriction (AT-noBFR). However, no significant effect was observed on muscle mass (SMD = 0.23, 95%CI: [-0.09, 0.56], <i>p</i> = 0.162). Furthermore, no moderating effects on the outcomes were found for individual characteristics or training factors. In conclusion, AT-BFR is more effective than AT-noBFR in improving aerobic capacity and muscle strength, making it a promising alternative to high-intensity training.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024559872.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1506386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747311/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1506386\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1506386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血流量限制有氧训练（AT-BFR）在提高有氧能力和运动表现方面显示出了希望。本综述的目的是系统地分析有关这种新型训练方法对年轻人有氧能力、肌肉力量和肥厚的有效性的证据。通过检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、CINAHL、Cochrane Library和EMBASE等数据库确定研究。荟萃分析共纳入16项研究，涉及270名受试者。结果显示，与无血流量限制的有氧训练（AT-noBFR）相比，AT-BFR在VO2max （SMD = 0.27, 95%CI: [0.02, 0.52], p < 0.05）和肌肉力量（SMD = 0.39, 95%CI: [0.09, 0.69], p < 0.05）方面有更大的改善。然而，对肌肉质量没有显著影响（SMD = 0.23, 95%CI: [-0.09, 0.56], p = 0.162）。此外，没有发现个体特征或训练因素对结果的调节作用。总之，AT-BFR在提高有氧能力和肌肉力量方面比AT-noBFR更有效，使其成为高强度训练的有希望的替代方案。系统综述注册：https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/，标识符CRD42024559872。
Effects of aerobic training with blood flow restriction on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and hypertrophy in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aerobic training with blood flow restriction (AT-BFR) has shown promise in enhancing both aerobic capacity and exercise performance. The aim of this review was to systematically analyze the evidence regarding the effectiveness of this novel training method on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and hypertrophy in young adults. Studies were identified through a search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. A total of 16 studies, involving 270 subjects, were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that AT-BFR induced greater improvements in VO2max (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI: [0.02, 0.52], p < 0.05), and muscle strength (SMD = 0.39, 95%CI: [0.09, 0.69], p < 0.05), compared to aerobic training with no blood flow restriction (AT-noBFR). However, no significant effect was observed on muscle mass (SMD = 0.23, 95%CI: [-0.09, 0.56], p = 0.162). Furthermore, no moderating effects on the outcomes were found for individual characteristics or training factors. In conclusion, AT-BFR is more effective than AT-noBFR in improving aerobic capacity and muscle strength, making it a promising alternative to high-intensity training.
期刊介绍：
Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
