高强度间歇训练对优秀运动员影响的荟萃分析——第一部分:对各种表现指标的平均影响。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526
Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Thomas Leonard Stöggl, Nils Haller, Julia Blumkaitis, Tilmann Strepp, Francesca Kilzer, Anna Schmuttermair, Will G Hopkins
{"title":"高强度间歇训练对优秀运动员影响的荟萃分析——第一部分:对各种表现指标的平均影响。","authors":"Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Thomas Leonard Stöggl, Nils Haller, Julia Blumkaitis, Tilmann Strepp, Francesca Kilzer, Anna Schmuttermair, Will G Hopkins","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meta-analysts have found that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves physical performance, but limited evidence exists regarding its effects on highly trained athletes, measures beyond maximum oxygen uptake ( <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>), and the moderating effects of different types of HIIT. In this study, we present meta-analyses of the effects of HIIT focusing on these deficits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The effects of 6 types of HIIT and other moderators were derived from 34 studies involving highly trained endurance and elite athletes in percent units via log-transformation from separate meta-regression mixed models for sprint, time-trial, aerobic/anaerobic threshold, peak speed/power, repeated-sprint ability, <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>, and exercise economy. The level of evidence for effect magnitudes was evaluated based on the effect uncertainty and the smallest important change of 1%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with control training, HIIT showed good to excellent evidence for the substantial enhancement of most measures for some athlete subgroups in practically important study settings defined by effect moderators (maximum of 12.6%, for endurance female athletes after 6 weeks of aerobic traditional long intervals). The assessment of the moderators indicated good evidence of greater effects as follows: with more aerobic types of HIIT for <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> (+2.6%); with HIIT added to conventional training for most measures (+1.1-2.3%); during the competition phase for <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> (+4.3%); and with tests of longer duration for sprint (+5.5%) and time trial (+4.9%). The effects of sex and type of athlete were unclear moderators. The heterogeneity of HIIT effects within a given type of setting varied from small to moderate (standard deviations of 1.1%-2.3%) and reduced the evidence of benefit in some settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although athletes in some settings can be confident of the beneficial effects of HIIT on some measures related to competition performance, further research is needed. There is uncertainty regarding the mean effects on exercise economy and the modifying effects of sex, duration of intervention, phase of training, and type of HIIT for most measures.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=236384.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1486526"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes-part I: mean effects on various performance measures.\",\"authors\":\"Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Thomas Leonard Stöggl, Nils Haller, Julia Blumkaitis, Tilmann Strepp, Francesca Kilzer, Anna Schmuttermair, Will G Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meta-analysts have found that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves physical performance, but limited evidence exists regarding its effects on highly trained athletes, measures beyond maximum oxygen uptake ( <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>), and the moderating effects of different types of HIIT. In this study, we present meta-analyses of the effects of HIIT focusing on these deficits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The effects of 6 types of HIIT and other moderators were derived from 34 studies involving highly trained endurance and elite athletes in percent units via log-transformation from separate meta-regression mixed models for sprint, time-trial, aerobic/anaerobic threshold, peak speed/power, repeated-sprint ability, <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>, and exercise economy. The level of evidence for effect magnitudes was evaluated based on the effect uncertainty and the smallest important change of 1%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with control training, HIIT showed good to excellent evidence for the substantial enhancement of most measures for some athlete subgroups in practically important study settings defined by effect moderators (maximum of 12.6%, for endurance female athletes after 6 weeks of aerobic traditional long intervals). The assessment of the moderators indicated good evidence of greater effects as follows: with more aerobic types of HIIT for <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> (+2.6%); with HIIT added to conventional training for most measures (+1.1-2.3%); during the competition phase for <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> (+4.3%); and with tests of longer duration for sprint (+5.5%) and time trial (+4.9%). The effects of sex and type of athlete were unclear moderators. The heterogeneity of HIIT effects within a given type of setting varied from small to moderate (standard deviations of 1.1%-2.3%) and reduced the evidence of benefit in some settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although athletes in some settings can be confident of the beneficial effects of HIIT on some measures related to competition performance, further research is needed. There is uncertainty regarding the mean effects on exercise economy and the modifying effects of sex, duration of intervention, phase of training, and type of HIIT for most measures.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=236384.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1486526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739151/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1486526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

荟萃分析发现,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)可以提高身体表现,但关于其对高训练运动员的影响、超过最大摄氧量(V˙O2max)的测量以及不同类型HIIT的调节作用的证据有限。在这项研究中,我们对HIIT对这些缺陷的影响进行了荟萃分析。方法:通过对短跑、计时赛、有氧/无氧阈值、峰值速度/功率、重复短跑能力、V˙O2max和运动经济性的元回归混合模型进行对数转换,从34项涉及高训练耐力运动员和精英运动员的研究中得出6种类型的HIIT和其他调节因子的影响。效应强度的证据水平是根据效应不确定性和最小重要变化1%来评估的。结果:与对照训练相比,HIIT表现出良好到极好的证据,在由效果调节剂定义的实际重要研究环境中,对一些运动员亚组的大多数措施都有实质性的增强(对于经过6周有氧传统长间隔训练的耐力女运动员,最大增强12.6%)。对调节剂的评估表明,有充分的证据表明,调节剂的效果更大,如下:对于V˙O2max (+2.6%), HIIT的有氧类型更多;在常规训练中加入HIIT (+1.1-2.3%);竞争期V˙O2max (+4.3%);短跑(+5.5%)和计时赛(+4.9%)的测试时间更长。性别和运动员类型的影响是不明确的调节因素。在给定类型的环境中,HIIT效果的异质性从小到中等不等(标准偏差为1.1%-2.3%),并且在某些环境中减少了获益的证据。结论:尽管在某些情况下,运动员可以确信HIIT对一些与比赛成绩相关的指标有有益的影响,但还需要进一步的研究。对于大多数测量方法,对于运动经济性的平均影响和性别、干预持续时间、训练阶段和HIIT类型的修正效应存在不确定性。系统评审注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=236384。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-analyses of the effects of high-intensity interval training in elite athletes-part I: mean effects on various performance measures.

Introduction: Meta-analysts have found that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves physical performance, but limited evidence exists regarding its effects on highly trained athletes, measures beyond maximum oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O2max), and the moderating effects of different types of HIIT. In this study, we present meta-analyses of the effects of HIIT focusing on these deficits.

Methods: The effects of 6 types of HIIT and other moderators were derived from 34 studies involving highly trained endurance and elite athletes in percent units via log-transformation from separate meta-regression mixed models for sprint, time-trial, aerobic/anaerobic threshold, peak speed/power, repeated-sprint ability, V ˙ O2max, and exercise economy. The level of evidence for effect magnitudes was evaluated based on the effect uncertainty and the smallest important change of 1%.

Results: Compared with control training, HIIT showed good to excellent evidence for the substantial enhancement of most measures for some athlete subgroups in practically important study settings defined by effect moderators (maximum of 12.6%, for endurance female athletes after 6 weeks of aerobic traditional long intervals). The assessment of the moderators indicated good evidence of greater effects as follows: with more aerobic types of HIIT for V ˙ O2max (+2.6%); with HIIT added to conventional training for most measures (+1.1-2.3%); during the competition phase for V ˙ O2max (+4.3%); and with tests of longer duration for sprint (+5.5%) and time trial (+4.9%). The effects of sex and type of athlete were unclear moderators. The heterogeneity of HIIT effects within a given type of setting varied from small to moderate (standard deviations of 1.1%-2.3%) and reduced the evidence of benefit in some settings.

Conclusion: Although athletes in some settings can be confident of the beneficial effects of HIIT on some measures related to competition performance, further research is needed. There is uncertainty regarding the mean effects on exercise economy and the modifying effects of sex, duration of intervention, phase of training, and type of HIIT for most measures.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=236384.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信