术前MRI在评估肝细胞癌大小梁-块状亚型中的诊断准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11344-9
Tingwen Zhou, Xiaorui Han, Chuyin Xiao, Xiaoxiao Lei, Xinxin Lan, Xinhua Wei, Yingying Liang, Hongzhen Wu
{"title":"术前MRI在评估肝细胞癌大小梁-块状亚型中的诊断准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tingwen Zhou, Xiaorui Han, Chuyin Xiao, Xiaoxiao Lei, Xinxin Lan, Xinhua Wei, Yingying Liang, Hongzhen Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11344-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, and Embase for studies evaluating the performance of MRI in assessing MTM-HCC. The quality assessment of diagnostic studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Diagnostic accuracy measures, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were pooled. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves with the area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of ten eligible studies including 2074 lesions in 2053 patients were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.65 (0.52, 0.76), 0.88 (0.80, 0.94), 5.6 (3.70, 8.60), 0.40 (0.30, 0.53), 14 (10, 20), and 0.84 (0.81, 0.87), respectively. High heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup> was 78.61% and 90.95% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively) along with a threshold effect (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.927, p < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that the MRI method (radiomics or non-radiomics) affected the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI has diagnostic value for MTM-HCC due to its higher specificity and moderate sensitivity, but its clinical application remains suboptimal due to significant heterogeneity. Thus, further prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question What is the value of MRI for preoperatively predicting MTM-HCC? Findings Meta-regression analyses revealed that the MRI method (radiomics or non-radiomics) is a significant factor contributing to heterogeneity. Clinical relevance This study demonstrates the high diagnostic accuracy of MRI for early detection of MTM-HCC, which can assist in guiding individualized management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"4111-4120"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative MRI in assessing macrotrabecular-massive subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tingwen Zhou, Xiaorui Han, Chuyin Xiao, Xiaoxiao Lei, Xinxin Lan, Xinhua Wei, Yingying Liang, Hongzhen Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-11344-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, and Embase for studies evaluating the performance of MRI in assessing MTM-HCC. The quality assessment of diagnostic studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Diagnostic accuracy measures, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were pooled. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves with the area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of ten eligible studies including 2074 lesions in 2053 patients were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.65 (0.52, 0.76), 0.88 (0.80, 0.94), 5.6 (3.70, 8.60), 0.40 (0.30, 0.53), 14 (10, 20), and 0.84 (0.81, 0.87), respectively. High heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup> was 78.61% and 90.95% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively) along with a threshold effect (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.927, p < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that the MRI method (radiomics or non-radiomics) affected the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI has diagnostic value for MTM-HCC due to its higher specificity and moderate sensitivity, but its clinical application remains suboptimal due to significant heterogeneity. Thus, further prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question What is the value of MRI for preoperatively predicting MTM-HCC? Findings Meta-regression analyses revealed that the MRI method (radiomics or non-radiomics) is a significant factor contributing to heterogeneity. Clinical relevance This study demonstrates the high diagnostic accuracy of MRI for early detection of MTM-HCC, which can assist in guiding individualized management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4111-4120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11344-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11344-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨术前磁共振成像(MRI)对大小梁-块状肝细胞癌(MTM-HCC)的预测价值。材料和方法:在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library数据库和Embase上检索评估MRI评估MTM-HCC性能的研究。采用诊断研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具评估偏倚风险。诊断准确性指标包括敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断优势比(DOR)。生成总体受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线及曲线下面积(AUC)。meta回归分析探讨异质性的潜在来源。结果:共分析了10项符合条件的研究,包括2053例患者的2074个病变。合并敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为0.65(0.52,0.76)、0.88(0.80,0.94)、5.6(3.70,8.60)、0.40(0.30,0.53)、14(10,20)和0.84(0.81,0.87)。结论:MRI具有较高的特异性和中等敏感性,具有诊断MTM-HCC的价值,但其临床应用仍不理想,异质性较大(I2敏感性为78.61%,特异性为90.95%)。因此,需要进一步的大样本量的前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。MRI在术前预测MTM-HCC中的价值是什么?荟萃回归分析显示,MRI方法(放射组学或非放射组学)是导致异质性的重要因素。临床意义本研究表明MRI对MTM-HCC的早期发现具有较高的诊断准确性,有助于指导个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative MRI in assessing macrotrabecular-massive subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: To determine the value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC).

Materials and methods: A search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, and Embase for studies evaluating the performance of MRI in assessing MTM-HCC. The quality assessment of diagnostic studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Diagnostic accuracy measures, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were pooled. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves with the area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results: A total of ten eligible studies including 2074 lesions in 2053 patients were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.65 (0.52, 0.76), 0.88 (0.80, 0.94), 5.6 (3.70, 8.60), 0.40 (0.30, 0.53), 14 (10, 20), and 0.84 (0.81, 0.87), respectively. High heterogeneity was observed (I2 was 78.61% and 90.95% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively) along with a threshold effect (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.927, p < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that the MRI method (radiomics or non-radiomics) affected the heterogeneity.

Conclusion: MRI has diagnostic value for MTM-HCC due to its higher specificity and moderate sensitivity, but its clinical application remains suboptimal due to significant heterogeneity. Thus, further prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.

Key points: Question What is the value of MRI for preoperatively predicting MTM-HCC? Findings Meta-regression analyses revealed that the MRI method (radiomics or non-radiomics) is a significant factor contributing to heterogeneity. Clinical relevance This study demonstrates the high diagnostic accuracy of MRI for early detection of MTM-HCC, which can assist in guiding individualized management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信