面神经下颌缘支解剖特点及临床意义。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Angela Babuci, Silvia Stratulat, Zinovia Zorina, Ilia Catereniuc, Anastasia Bendelic, Sergiu Calancea, Sofia Lehtman, Gabriela Motelica, Andrei Mostovei
{"title":"面神经下颌缘支解剖特点及临床意义。","authors":"Angela Babuci, Silvia Stratulat, Zinovia Zorina, Ilia Catereniuc, Anastasia Bendelic, Sergiu Calancea, Sofia Lehtman, Gabriela Motelica, Andrei Mostovei","doi":"10.5603/fm.104026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expanding number of parotid ablations, reconstructive and aesthetic surgeries of the head and neck, considerably increased the risk of the marginal mandibular branch (MMB) injury. The purpose of our study was to determine the anatomical peculiarities of the MMB depending on the facial nerve branching pattern (FNBP), gender and cephalometric type.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The MMB was dissected on 75 hemiheads of adult embalmed cadavers. The origin, number of branches, topography and connections of the MMB were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven FNBP were identified: Type I (18.7%); Type II (14.7%); Type III (20%); Type IV (14.6%); Type V (5.3%); Type VI (18.7%); Type NI (8%, non-identified types). In males 1-3 MMB were determined and in females 1-4 MMB; p = 0.845. In males, bilaterally were identified 1-3 MMB. In females on the right side were found 1-2 MMB and on the left - 1-4 MMB; p = 0.204. A single MMB was revealed in 41 cases (54.7%), 2 MMB - in 29 cases (38.7%), 3 MMB - in 4 cases (5.3%) and in a single case 4 MMB (1.3%) were determined. Depending on the FNBP, the number of the MMB was: Type I - 1.2 ± 0.43; Type II - 1.5 ± 0.52; Type III - 1.6 ± 0.63; Type IV - 1.5 ± 0.52; Type V - 1.3 ± 0.50; Type VI - 1.9 ± 0.95; Type NI - 1.7 ± 0.82. IGFV = 1.403 (intergroup frequency variation); df = 6 (degree of freedom); p = 0.226. According to the cephalometric type the number of the MMB in mesocephalic type (MCT) was 1.5 ± 0.68; in brachycephalic type (BCT) - 1.6 ± 0.52; in dolichocephalic type (DCT) - 1.9 ± 0.60. IGFV = 1.698; df = 2; p = 0.190. A rare variant of the MMB origin from the temporofacial division of the facial nerve was highlighted in 5.3% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MMB varies depending on the FNBP, gender and cephalometric type. The highest variation degree was characteristic of females, Type VI and DCT. The lowest variation degree was determined in Type I and in MCT, without gender differences. The risk of iatrogenic lesions of the MMB is conditioned by two important aspects: its anatomical variability and large number of surgical interventions at that level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12251,"journal":{"name":"Folia morphologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve - anatomical peculiarities and clinical aspects.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Babuci, Silvia Stratulat, Zinovia Zorina, Ilia Catereniuc, Anastasia Bendelic, Sergiu Calancea, Sofia Lehtman, Gabriela Motelica, Andrei Mostovei\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/fm.104026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expanding number of parotid ablations, reconstructive and aesthetic surgeries of the head and neck, considerably increased the risk of the marginal mandibular branch (MMB) injury. The purpose of our study was to determine the anatomical peculiarities of the MMB depending on the facial nerve branching pattern (FNBP), gender and cephalometric type.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The MMB was dissected on 75 hemiheads of adult embalmed cadavers. The origin, number of branches, topography and connections of the MMB were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven FNBP were identified: Type I (18.7%); Type II (14.7%); Type III (20%); Type IV (14.6%); Type V (5.3%); Type VI (18.7%); Type NI (8%, non-identified types). In males 1-3 MMB were determined and in females 1-4 MMB; p = 0.845. In males, bilaterally were identified 1-3 MMB. In females on the right side were found 1-2 MMB and on the left - 1-4 MMB; p = 0.204. A single MMB was revealed in 41 cases (54.7%), 2 MMB - in 29 cases (38.7%), 3 MMB - in 4 cases (5.3%) and in a single case 4 MMB (1.3%) were determined. Depending on the FNBP, the number of the MMB was: Type I - 1.2 ± 0.43; Type II - 1.5 ± 0.52; Type III - 1.6 ± 0.63; Type IV - 1.5 ± 0.52; Type V - 1.3 ± 0.50; Type VI - 1.9 ± 0.95; Type NI - 1.7 ± 0.82. IGFV = 1.403 (intergroup frequency variation); df = 6 (degree of freedom); p = 0.226. According to the cephalometric type the number of the MMB in mesocephalic type (MCT) was 1.5 ± 0.68; in brachycephalic type (BCT) - 1.6 ± 0.52; in dolichocephalic type (DCT) - 1.9 ± 0.60. IGFV = 1.698; df = 2; p = 0.190. A rare variant of the MMB origin from the temporofacial division of the facial nerve was highlighted in 5.3% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MMB varies depending on the FNBP, gender and cephalometric type. The highest variation degree was characteristic of females, Type VI and DCT. The lowest variation degree was determined in Type I and in MCT, without gender differences. The risk of iatrogenic lesions of the MMB is conditioned by two important aspects: its anatomical variability and large number of surgical interventions at that level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia morphologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia morphologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.104026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia morphologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.104026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腮腺消融、头颈部重建和美容手术数量的增加,大大增加了下颌边缘分支(MMB)损伤的风险。我们研究的目的是确定MMB的解剖特点取决于面神经分支模式(FNBP),性别和头型。材料与方法:对75具成人尸体的半头进行MMB解剖。分析了MMB的起源、分支数量、形貌和连接方式。结果:共鉴定出7例FNBP: I型(18.7%);II型(14.7%);III型(20%);IV型(14.6%);V型(5.3%);VI型(18.7%);NI型(8%,未确定类型)。男性1-3 MMB,女性1-4 MMB;P = 0.845。在男性中,双侧被确定为1-3 MMB。女性右侧1-2 MMB,左侧1-4 MMB;P = 0.204。单个MMB 41例(54.7%),2 MMB - 29例(38.7%),3 MMB - 4例(5.3%),单个MMB 4例(1.3%)。根据FNBP的不同,MMB的数量为:I型- 1.2±0.43;II型- 1.5±0.52;III型- 1.6±0.63;IV型- 1.5±0.52;V型- 1.3±0.50;VI型- 1.9±0.95;NI型- 1.7±0.82。IGFV = 1.403(组间频率变化);Df = 6(自由度);P = 0.226。中脑型(MCT)的MMB数为1.5±0.68个;短头型(BCT) - 1.6±0.52;多头型(DCT) - 1.9±0.60。Igfv = 1.698;Df = 2;P = 0.190。一种罕见的源自面神经颞面部的MMB变异在5.3%的病例中被强调。结论:MMB与FNBP、性别和头测类型有关。变异程度最高的是女性、VI型和DCT。在I型和MCT中变异程度最低,无性别差异。MMB的医源性病变的风险是由两个重要方面决定的:它的解剖变异性和大量的手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve - anatomical peculiarities and clinical aspects.

Background: The expanding number of parotid ablations, reconstructive and aesthetic surgeries of the head and neck, considerably increased the risk of the marginal mandibular branch (MMB) injury. The purpose of our study was to determine the anatomical peculiarities of the MMB depending on the facial nerve branching pattern (FNBP), gender and cephalometric type.

Materials and methods: The MMB was dissected on 75 hemiheads of adult embalmed cadavers. The origin, number of branches, topography and connections of the MMB were analyzed.

Results: Seven FNBP were identified: Type I (18.7%); Type II (14.7%); Type III (20%); Type IV (14.6%); Type V (5.3%); Type VI (18.7%); Type NI (8%, non-identified types). In males 1-3 MMB were determined and in females 1-4 MMB; p = 0.845. In males, bilaterally were identified 1-3 MMB. In females on the right side were found 1-2 MMB and on the left - 1-4 MMB; p = 0.204. A single MMB was revealed in 41 cases (54.7%), 2 MMB - in 29 cases (38.7%), 3 MMB - in 4 cases (5.3%) and in a single case 4 MMB (1.3%) were determined. Depending on the FNBP, the number of the MMB was: Type I - 1.2 ± 0.43; Type II - 1.5 ± 0.52; Type III - 1.6 ± 0.63; Type IV - 1.5 ± 0.52; Type V - 1.3 ± 0.50; Type VI - 1.9 ± 0.95; Type NI - 1.7 ± 0.82. IGFV = 1.403 (intergroup frequency variation); df = 6 (degree of freedom); p = 0.226. According to the cephalometric type the number of the MMB in mesocephalic type (MCT) was 1.5 ± 0.68; in brachycephalic type (BCT) - 1.6 ± 0.52; in dolichocephalic type (DCT) - 1.9 ± 0.60. IGFV = 1.698; df = 2; p = 0.190. A rare variant of the MMB origin from the temporofacial division of the facial nerve was highlighted in 5.3% of cases.

Conclusions: The MMB varies depending on the FNBP, gender and cephalometric type. The highest variation degree was characteristic of females, Type VI and DCT. The lowest variation degree was determined in Type I and in MCT, without gender differences. The risk of iatrogenic lesions of the MMB is conditioned by two important aspects: its anatomical variability and large number of surgical interventions at that level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Folia morphologica
Folia morphologica ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Folia Morphologica" is an official journal of the Polish Anatomical Society (a Constituent Member of European Federation for Experimental Morphology - EFEM). It contains original articles and reviews on morphology in the broadest sense (descriptive, experimental, and methodological). Papers dealing with practical application of morphological research to clinical problems may also be considered. Full-length papers as well as short research notes can be submitted. Descriptive papers dealing with non-mammals, cannot be accepted for publication with some exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信