为拔管和其他程序而中断喂养。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mickael Landais, Stephan Ehrmann, Christophe Guitton
{"title":"为拔管和其他程序而中断喂养。","authors":"Mickael Landais, Stephan Ehrmann, Christophe Guitton","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The objective of this review is to examine the available evidence concerning feeding interruptions before extubation and other medical procedures in ICUs. We will analyze the physiological mechanisms involved, the potential risks associated with feeding interruptions, as well as the results of recent clinical studies. Additionally, we will explore current practices and recommendations from major professional societies, as well as recent innovations aimed at minimizing feeding interruptions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Fasting before extubation is a common yet heterogeneous practice, varying across ICUs. Although dysphagia is a frequent complication after extubation, its prevalence decreases over time. However, physiologically, fasting before extubation appears ineffective in reducing gastric content or preventing aspiration. The Ambroisie study demonstrated that continuing enteral nutrition up to extubation is not inferior to a 6 h fasting strategy in terms of extubation failure at 7 days. The management of perioperative nutrition in intubated patients is debated. A retrospective study found no significant difference in postoperative respiratory events between patients fasting for at least 6 h and those fasting less or not at all but further prospective randomized studies are needed for definitive conclusions. For abdominal and digestive surgeries, fasting remains necessary to simplify procedures and reduce contamination risks. For invasive ICU procedures, such as catheter placement, the continuation of enteral nutrition appears reasonable. However, for percutaneous tracheotomy, limited evidence suggests no clear benefit from fasting, though the risk of large-volume aspiration during the procedure raises concerns. The approach to nutrition in this context requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Fasting before extubation in ICUs is a common practice inherited from anesthesia, aiming to reduce the risk of aspiration. The Ambroisie study demonstrates that continuing enteral nutrition until extubation is not inferior to a 6 h fasting strategy regarding extubation failure at 7 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeding interruptions for extubation and other procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Mickael Landais, Stephan Ehrmann, Christophe Guitton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The objective of this review is to examine the available evidence concerning feeding interruptions before extubation and other medical procedures in ICUs. We will analyze the physiological mechanisms involved, the potential risks associated with feeding interruptions, as well as the results of recent clinical studies. Additionally, we will explore current practices and recommendations from major professional societies, as well as recent innovations aimed at minimizing feeding interruptions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Fasting before extubation is a common yet heterogeneous practice, varying across ICUs. Although dysphagia is a frequent complication after extubation, its prevalence decreases over time. However, physiologically, fasting before extubation appears ineffective in reducing gastric content or preventing aspiration. The Ambroisie study demonstrated that continuing enteral nutrition up to extubation is not inferior to a 6 h fasting strategy in terms of extubation failure at 7 days. The management of perioperative nutrition in intubated patients is debated. A retrospective study found no significant difference in postoperative respiratory events between patients fasting for at least 6 h and those fasting less or not at all but further prospective randomized studies are needed for definitive conclusions. For abdominal and digestive surgeries, fasting remains necessary to simplify procedures and reduce contamination risks. For invasive ICU procedures, such as catheter placement, the continuation of enteral nutrition appears reasonable. However, for percutaneous tracheotomy, limited evidence suggests no clear benefit from fasting, though the risk of large-volume aspiration during the procedure raises concerns. The approach to nutrition in this context requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Fasting before extubation in ICUs is a common practice inherited from anesthesia, aiming to reduce the risk of aspiration. The Ambroisie study demonstrates that continuing enteral nutrition until extubation is not inferior to a 6 h fasting strategy regarding extubation failure at 7 days.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:本综述的目的是研究有关icu拔管前和其他医疗程序前喂养中断的现有证据。我们将分析所涉及的生理机制,与喂养中断相关的潜在风险,以及最近的临床研究结果。此外,我们将探讨主要专业协会的现行做法和建议,以及旨在尽量减少喂养中断的最新创新。最近发现:拔管前禁食是一种常见但异质性的做法,在不同的icu中有所不同。虽然吞咽困难是拔管后常见的并发症,但其患病率随着时间的推移而降低。然而,从生理学上讲,拔管前禁食对减少胃内容物或防止误吸似乎是无效的。Ambroisie研究表明,就拔管失败7天而言,持续肠内营养直到拔管并不逊于禁食6小时策略。插管患者围手术期营养管理存在争议。一项回顾性研究发现,禁食至少6小时的患者与禁食时间较短或根本不禁食的患者在术后呼吸事件方面没有显著差异,但需要进一步的前瞻性随机研究来得出明确的结论。对于腹部和消化手术,禁食仍然是必要的,以简化程序并减少污染风险。对于有创ICU手术,如置管,继续肠内营养似乎是合理的。然而,对于经皮气管切开术,有限的证据表明禁食没有明显的益处,尽管手术过程中大容量吸入的风险引起了人们的关注。这种情况下的营养方法需要进一步调查。摘要:icu拔管前禁食是一种从麻醉中继承下来的常见做法,旨在降低误吸的风险。Ambroisie研究表明,对于拔管失败的第7天,持续肠内营养直到拔管并不亚于6小时禁食策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feeding interruptions for extubation and other procedures.

Purpose of review: The objective of this review is to examine the available evidence concerning feeding interruptions before extubation and other medical procedures in ICUs. We will analyze the physiological mechanisms involved, the potential risks associated with feeding interruptions, as well as the results of recent clinical studies. Additionally, we will explore current practices and recommendations from major professional societies, as well as recent innovations aimed at minimizing feeding interruptions.

Recent findings: Fasting before extubation is a common yet heterogeneous practice, varying across ICUs. Although dysphagia is a frequent complication after extubation, its prevalence decreases over time. However, physiologically, fasting before extubation appears ineffective in reducing gastric content or preventing aspiration. The Ambroisie study demonstrated that continuing enteral nutrition up to extubation is not inferior to a 6 h fasting strategy in terms of extubation failure at 7 days. The management of perioperative nutrition in intubated patients is debated. A retrospective study found no significant difference in postoperative respiratory events between patients fasting for at least 6 h and those fasting less or not at all but further prospective randomized studies are needed for definitive conclusions. For abdominal and digestive surgeries, fasting remains necessary to simplify procedures and reduce contamination risks. For invasive ICU procedures, such as catheter placement, the continuation of enteral nutrition appears reasonable. However, for percutaneous tracheotomy, limited evidence suggests no clear benefit from fasting, though the risk of large-volume aspiration during the procedure raises concerns. The approach to nutrition in this context requires further investigation.

Summary: Fasting before extubation in ICUs is a common practice inherited from anesthesia, aiming to reduce the risk of aspiration. The Ambroisie study demonstrates that continuing enteral nutrition until extubation is not inferior to a 6 h fasting strategy regarding extubation failure at 7 days.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信