来自不同来源的益生元对与西方饮食相关的益生菌群的影响:来自人类粘膜人工结肠(M-ARCOL)的见解。

IF 6.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Current Research in Food Science Pub Date : 2024-12-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100968
Ophélie Uriot, Clémence Defois-Fraysse, Ingrid Couturier, Charlotte Deschamps, Claude Durif, Cyril Chaudemanche, Assia Dreux-Zigha, Stéphanie Blanquet-Diot
{"title":"来自不同来源的益生元对与西方饮食相关的益生菌群的影响:来自人类粘膜人工结肠(M-ARCOL)的见解。","authors":"Ophélie Uriot, Clémence Defois-Fraysse, Ingrid Couturier, Charlotte Deschamps, Claude Durif, Cyril Chaudemanche, Assia Dreux-Zigha, Stéphanie Blanquet-Diot","doi":"10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Associated to various illnesses, Western Diet (WD) is acknowledged to have deleterious effects on human gut microbiota, decreasing bacterial diversity, lowering gut bacteria associated to health (such as <i>Akkermansia muciniphila)</i>, while increasing those linked to diseases (e.g., <i>Proteobacteria</i>). In this study, we evaluated the potential of two new prebiotics to counteract the negative effect of WD on gut microbiota, namely raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO) from chickpeas and laminarin (LAM) from algae, when compared to the well-known inulin (INU). The effects of prebiotics on gut microbiota composition and metabolic activities were investigated in the Mucosal-Artificial Colon, set-up to reproduce WD condition, as compared to healthy control (n = 3). None of the prebiotics was able to efficiently offset the shift in microbiota induced by WD. Nevertheless, when compared to non-supplemented WD, all prebiotics showed significant impacts on microbiota composition, that were both prebiotic and donor-dependant. RFO was the only prebiotic to enhance α-diversity, while it led to an increase in <i>Blautia</i> and <i>Butyricicoccaceae</i>, associated with higher amounts of gas and butyrate. LAM and INU did not strongly impact microbial metabolic activities but were associated with a rise in <i>Prevotella_9</i>/<i>Agathobacter</i> and <i>Faecalibacterium,</i> respectively. To conclude, this study showed that all tested prebiotics had different impacts on human gut microbiota structure and activities, which was further donor-dependent. M-ARCOL appears as a suitable <i>in vitro</i> tool to better understand the mechanisms of action of prebiotic compounds in relation to gut microbes and define responders and non-responders to prebiotic supplementation, opening the possibility of customized nutritional strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10939,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Food Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"100968"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of prebiotics from diverse sources on dysbiotic gut microbiota associated to western diet: Insights from the human Mucosal ARtificial COLon (M-ARCOL).\",\"authors\":\"Ophélie Uriot, Clémence Defois-Fraysse, Ingrid Couturier, Charlotte Deschamps, Claude Durif, Cyril Chaudemanche, Assia Dreux-Zigha, Stéphanie Blanquet-Diot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Associated to various illnesses, Western Diet (WD) is acknowledged to have deleterious effects on human gut microbiota, decreasing bacterial diversity, lowering gut bacteria associated to health (such as <i>Akkermansia muciniphila)</i>, while increasing those linked to diseases (e.g., <i>Proteobacteria</i>). In this study, we evaluated the potential of two new prebiotics to counteract the negative effect of WD on gut microbiota, namely raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO) from chickpeas and laminarin (LAM) from algae, when compared to the well-known inulin (INU). The effects of prebiotics on gut microbiota composition and metabolic activities were investigated in the Mucosal-Artificial Colon, set-up to reproduce WD condition, as compared to healthy control (n = 3). None of the prebiotics was able to efficiently offset the shift in microbiota induced by WD. Nevertheless, when compared to non-supplemented WD, all prebiotics showed significant impacts on microbiota composition, that were both prebiotic and donor-dependant. RFO was the only prebiotic to enhance α-diversity, while it led to an increase in <i>Blautia</i> and <i>Butyricicoccaceae</i>, associated with higher amounts of gas and butyrate. LAM and INU did not strongly impact microbial metabolic activities but were associated with a rise in <i>Prevotella_9</i>/<i>Agathobacter</i> and <i>Faecalibacterium,</i> respectively. To conclude, this study showed that all tested prebiotics had different impacts on human gut microbiota structure and activities, which was further donor-dependent. M-ARCOL appears as a suitable <i>in vitro</i> tool to better understand the mechanisms of action of prebiotic compounds in relation to gut microbes and define responders and non-responders to prebiotic supplementation, opening the possibility of customized nutritional strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Food Science\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"100968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100968\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与各种疾病相关,西方饮食(WD)被认为对人类肠道微生物群有有害影响,减少细菌多样性,减少与健康相关的肠道细菌(如嗜muciniphila),同时增加与疾病相关的肠道细菌(如变形杆菌)。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种新的益生元的潜力,以抵消WD对肠道微生物群的负面影响,即来自鹰嘴豆的棉子糖家族寡糖(RFO)和来自藻类的层粘胶蛋白(LAM),并与众所周知的菊粉(INU)进行了比较。与健康对照组(n = 3)相比,研究人员在黏膜人工结肠中研究了益生元对肠道微生物群组成和代谢活性的影响,以重现WD条件。没有一种益生元能够有效抵消WD诱导的微生物群变化。然而,与未添加WD相比,所有益生元对微生物群组成都有显著影响,既有益生元又有供体依赖性。RFO是唯一能提高α-多样性的益生元,而RFO能增加蓝藻科和丁酸菌科的α-多样性,并伴有较高的气体和丁酸盐含量。LAM和INU对微生物代谢活动没有强烈影响,但分别与Prevotella_9/ agaththobacter和Faecalibacterium的增加有关。综上所述,本研究表明,所有被测试的益生元对人类肠道菌群的结构和活动有不同的影响,这进一步依赖于供体。M-ARCOL是一种合适的体外工具,可以更好地了解益生元化合物与肠道微生物的作用机制,并确定益生元补充的反应和无反应,从而为定制营养策略提供可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of prebiotics from diverse sources on dysbiotic gut microbiota associated to western diet: Insights from the human Mucosal ARtificial COLon (M-ARCOL).

Associated to various illnesses, Western Diet (WD) is acknowledged to have deleterious effects on human gut microbiota, decreasing bacterial diversity, lowering gut bacteria associated to health (such as Akkermansia muciniphila), while increasing those linked to diseases (e.g., Proteobacteria). In this study, we evaluated the potential of two new prebiotics to counteract the negative effect of WD on gut microbiota, namely raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO) from chickpeas and laminarin (LAM) from algae, when compared to the well-known inulin (INU). The effects of prebiotics on gut microbiota composition and metabolic activities were investigated in the Mucosal-Artificial Colon, set-up to reproduce WD condition, as compared to healthy control (n = 3). None of the prebiotics was able to efficiently offset the shift in microbiota induced by WD. Nevertheless, when compared to non-supplemented WD, all prebiotics showed significant impacts on microbiota composition, that were both prebiotic and donor-dependant. RFO was the only prebiotic to enhance α-diversity, while it led to an increase in Blautia and Butyricicoccaceae, associated with higher amounts of gas and butyrate. LAM and INU did not strongly impact microbial metabolic activities but were associated with a rise in Prevotella_9/Agathobacter and Faecalibacterium, respectively. To conclude, this study showed that all tested prebiotics had different impacts on human gut microbiota structure and activities, which was further donor-dependent. M-ARCOL appears as a suitable in vitro tool to better understand the mechanisms of action of prebiotic compounds in relation to gut microbes and define responders and non-responders to prebiotic supplementation, opening the possibility of customized nutritional strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Food Science
Current Research in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
232
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Current Research in Food Science is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the breadth of knowledge in the field of food science. It serves as a platform for publishing original research articles and short communications that encompass a wide array of topics, including food chemistry, physics, microbiology, nutrition, nutraceuticals, process and package engineering, materials science, food sustainability, and food security. By covering these diverse areas, the journal aims to provide a comprehensive source of the latest scientific findings and technological advancements that are shaping the future of the food industry. The journal's scope is designed to address the multidisciplinary nature of food science, reflecting its commitment to promoting innovation and ensuring the safety and quality of the food supply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信