踝足矫形器用于改善因神经肌肉疾病引起的小腿肌肉无力的成人行走。

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elza van Duijnhoven, Niels Fj Waterval, Fieke Sophia Koopman, Alberto Esquenazi, Frans Nollet, Merel-Anne Brehm
{"title":"踝足矫形器用于改善因神经肌肉疾病引起的小腿肌肉无力的成人行走。","authors":"Elza van Duijnhoven, Niels Fj Waterval, Fieke Sophia Koopman, Alberto Esquenazi, Frans Nollet, Merel-Anne Brehm","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD014871.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calf muscle weakness is a common symptom in slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders that lead to walking problems like instability and increased walking effort. The mainstay of treatment to improve walking in this population is the provision of ankle-foot-orthoses (AFOs). Since we are not aware of an up-to-date and complete overview of the effects of AFOs used for calf muscle weakness in slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders, we reviewed the evidence for the effectiveness of AFOs to improve walking in this patient group, in order to support clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the evidence for the effects of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) for improving walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>On 10 February 2023, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We looked for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including randomised cross-over studies and quasi-RCTs, and non-randomised studies (NRSs) that examined the effects of AFO interventions compared with shoes-only walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used the methodological procedures described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We summarised findings for the primary outcome (objectively measured walking effort, assessed as walking energy cost) and secondary outcomes (perceived walking effort, physical mobility, gait parameters, AFO use, satisfaction with the AFO, and adverse events). We grouped results according to the type of AFO material and synthesised them in meta-analysis where possible. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included four randomised cross-over studies and six NRSs with 186 participants in total (the smallest study had 8 participants and the largest had 37). All studies were designed as self-controlled studies and examined the effects of custom-made and/or prefabricated AFOs. The AFOs were made of carbon (5 studies), polypropylene (5 studies), silicone (1 study), metal (1 study), elastic materials (2 studies), or leather combined with other materials (1 study). Outcome measures with AFOs were assessed during a single session (in some studies, people already used the study AFO in daily life), when the AFO was delivered, or at three-week or three-month follow-up. We judged one study to be at moderate risk of bias, and nine studies to be at high or serious risk of bias, primarily due to bias arising from period and carryover effects, selection bias, the inability to blind participants and assessors, missing data, and selective reporting. We found that carbon AFOs may reduce walking energy cost (mean difference (MD) -0.86 J/kg/m, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.33 to -0.39; 2 studies, 45 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may increase walking speed (MD 0.19 m/s, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.27; 4 studies, 71 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to shoes-only walking. We found that leather AFOs may increase walking speed (MD 0.25 m/s, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.43; 1 study, 11 participants; low-certainty evidence). Little or no effect on walking speed was found with polypropylene AFOs (MD 0.00 m/s, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.11; 2 studies, 25 participants; low-certainty evidence) and elastic AFOs (MD 0.03 m/s, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.18; 1 study, 14 participants; low-certainty evidence). Carbon AFOs may also enhance satisfaction while walking (1 study, 16 participants; low-certainty evidence). We were unable to draw conclusions about perceived walking effort (one study, 8 participants), balance (two studies, 21 participants), and AFO use (two studies, 51 participants), as the evidence is very uncertain. Finally, two studies (45 participants) reported on adverse events (low-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>The available evidence for ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) to improve walking in adults with calf muscle weakness comes from a limited number of small studies with heterogeneity in intervention characteristics and outcome assessment, and is of low to very low certainty. The evidence suggests that carbon AFOs may reduce walking energy cost (effort), increase walking speed, and enhance satisfaction, and leather AFOs may increase walking speed, while polypropylene and elastic AFOs may make little or no difference to walking speed. We are unable to draw conclusions about the effects of AFOs on perceived walking effort, balance, and use. Nor can we draw conclusions about adverse effects of using AFOs. The variety in the findings for AFOs made of different materials suggests further investigation is warranted to explore how different AFO materials impact walking improvement in people with calf muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"1 ","pages":"CD014871"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ankle-foot orthoses for improving walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to neuromuscular disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Elza van Duijnhoven, Niels Fj Waterval, Fieke Sophia Koopman, Alberto Esquenazi, Frans Nollet, Merel-Anne Brehm\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.CD014871.pub2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calf muscle weakness is a common symptom in slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders that lead to walking problems like instability and increased walking effort. The mainstay of treatment to improve walking in this population is the provision of ankle-foot-orthoses (AFOs). Since we are not aware of an up-to-date and complete overview of the effects of AFOs used for calf muscle weakness in slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders, we reviewed the evidence for the effectiveness of AFOs to improve walking in this patient group, in order to support clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the evidence for the effects of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) for improving walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>On 10 February 2023, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>We looked for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including randomised cross-over studies and quasi-RCTs, and non-randomised studies (NRSs) that examined the effects of AFO interventions compared with shoes-only walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to neuromuscular disorders.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>We used the methodological procedures described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We summarised findings for the primary outcome (objectively measured walking effort, assessed as walking energy cost) and secondary outcomes (perceived walking effort, physical mobility, gait parameters, AFO use, satisfaction with the AFO, and adverse events). We grouped results according to the type of AFO material and synthesised them in meta-analysis where possible. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We included four randomised cross-over studies and six NRSs with 186 participants in total (the smallest study had 8 participants and the largest had 37). All studies were designed as self-controlled studies and examined the effects of custom-made and/or prefabricated AFOs. The AFOs were made of carbon (5 studies), polypropylene (5 studies), silicone (1 study), metal (1 study), elastic materials (2 studies), or leather combined with other materials (1 study). Outcome measures with AFOs were assessed during a single session (in some studies, people already used the study AFO in daily life), when the AFO was delivered, or at three-week or three-month follow-up. We judged one study to be at moderate risk of bias, and nine studies to be at high or serious risk of bias, primarily due to bias arising from period and carryover effects, selection bias, the inability to blind participants and assessors, missing data, and selective reporting. We found that carbon AFOs may reduce walking energy cost (mean difference (MD) -0.86 J/kg/m, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.33 to -0.39; 2 studies, 45 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may increase walking speed (MD 0.19 m/s, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.27; 4 studies, 71 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to shoes-only walking. We found that leather AFOs may increase walking speed (MD 0.25 m/s, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.43; 1 study, 11 participants; low-certainty evidence). Little or no effect on walking speed was found with polypropylene AFOs (MD 0.00 m/s, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.11; 2 studies, 25 participants; low-certainty evidence) and elastic AFOs (MD 0.03 m/s, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.18; 1 study, 14 participants; low-certainty evidence). Carbon AFOs may also enhance satisfaction while walking (1 study, 16 participants; low-certainty evidence). We were unable to draw conclusions about perceived walking effort (one study, 8 participants), balance (two studies, 21 participants), and AFO use (two studies, 51 participants), as the evidence is very uncertain. Finally, two studies (45 participants) reported on adverse events (low-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>The available evidence for ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) to improve walking in adults with calf muscle weakness comes from a limited number of small studies with heterogeneity in intervention characteristics and outcome assessment, and is of low to very low certainty. The evidence suggests that carbon AFOs may reduce walking energy cost (effort), increase walking speed, and enhance satisfaction, and leather AFOs may increase walking speed, while polypropylene and elastic AFOs may make little or no difference to walking speed. We are unable to draw conclusions about the effects of AFOs on perceived walking effort, balance, and use. Nor can we draw conclusions about adverse effects of using AFOs. The variety in the findings for AFOs made of different materials suggests further investigation is warranted to explore how different AFO materials impact walking improvement in people with calf muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"CD014871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737026/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014871.pub2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014871.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小腿肌无力是缓慢进行性神经肌肉疾病的常见症状,导致行走不稳定和行走力增加等问题。改善该人群行走的主要治疗方法是提供踝足矫形器(AFOs)。由于我们不了解afo治疗缓慢进行性神经肌肉疾病中小腿肌肉无力的最新和完整的综述,我们回顾了afo改善该患者组行走效果的证据,以支持临床决策。目的:回顾踝足矫形器(AFOs)对改善缓慢进行性神经肌肉疾病引起的小腿肌肉无力的成人行走效果的证据。检索方法:2023年2月10日,我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉专科登记处、CENTRAL、Embase、MEDLINE、ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO ICTRP。选择标准:我们寻找随机对照试验(RCTs),包括随机交叉研究和准随机对照试验,以及非随机研究(NRSs),这些研究比较了AFO干预与仅穿鞋行走对因神经肌肉疾病引起的小腿肌肉无力的成年人的影响。数据收集和分析:我们使用Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册中描述的方法程序。我们总结了主要结果(客观测量的步行努力,以步行能量成本评估)和次要结果(感知的步行努力,身体活动能力,步态参数,AFO使用,对AFO的满意度和不良事件)的研究结果。我们根据AFO材料的类型对结果进行分组,并在可能的情况下在荟萃分析中进行综合。我们使用GRADE方法来评价证据的确定性。主要结果:我们纳入了4项随机交叉研究和6项NRSs,共186名参与者(最小的研究有8名参与者,最大的研究有37名参与者)。所有的研究都被设计为自我控制研究,并检查了定制和/或预制afo的效果。afo由碳(5项研究)、聚丙烯(5项研究)、有机硅(1项研究)、金属(1项研究)、弹性材料(2项研究)或皮革与其他材料的结合(1项研究)制成。使用AFO的结果测量是在单次会议(在一些研究中,人们已经在日常生活中使用了AFO), AFO交付时,或在三周或三个月的随访中进行评估。我们判定一项研究有中度偏倚风险,九项研究有高度或严重偏倚风险,主要是由于期间和延续效应、选择偏倚、无法盲化参与者和评估者、缺失数据和选择性报告引起的偏倚。我们发现碳afo可以降低步行能量成本(平均差值(MD) -0.86 J/kg/m, 95%置信区间(CI) -1.33至-0.39;2项研究,45名受试者;低确定性证据),并可能增加步行速度(MD 0.19 m/s, 95% CI 0.11 ~ 0.27;4项研究,71名受试者;低确定性证据)与只穿鞋走路相比。我们发现真皮afo可以提高步行速度(MD为0.25 m/s, 95% CI为0.07 ~ 0.43;1项研究,11名参与者;确定性的证据)。聚丙烯afo对步行速度的影响很小或没有影响(MD 0.00 m/s, 95% CI -0.11 ~ 0.11;2项研究,25名受试者;低确定性证据)和弹性afo (MD 0.03 m/s, 95% CI -0.12至0.18;1项研究,14名参与者;确定性的证据)。碳AFOs也可以提高步行时的满意度(1项研究,16名参与者;确定性的证据)。由于证据非常不确定,我们无法得出关于感知步行努力(一项研究,8名参与者)、平衡(两项研究,21名参与者)和AFO使用(两项研究,51名参与者)的结论。最后,两项研究(45名参与者)报告了不良事件(低确定性证据)。作者的结论是:踝足矫形器(AFOs)改善小腿肌无力成人行走的现有证据来自数量有限的小型研究,这些研究在干预特征和结果评估方面存在异质性,并且确定性低至极低。研究结果表明,碳纤维afo可以降低步行能量成本(努力),提高步行速度,提高步行满意度;皮革afo可以提高步行速度,而聚丙烯和弹性afo对步行速度的影响很小或没有影响。我们无法得出关于afo对感知行走力、平衡和使用的影响的结论。我们也不能得出使用afo的不良影响的结论。不同材料的AFO的不同发现表明,有必要进一步研究不同的AFO材料如何影响由于缓慢进行性神经肌肉疾病引起的小腿肌肉无力患者的行走改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ankle-foot orthoses for improving walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to neuromuscular disorders.

Background: Calf muscle weakness is a common symptom in slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders that lead to walking problems like instability and increased walking effort. The mainstay of treatment to improve walking in this population is the provision of ankle-foot-orthoses (AFOs). Since we are not aware of an up-to-date and complete overview of the effects of AFOs used for calf muscle weakness in slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders, we reviewed the evidence for the effectiveness of AFOs to improve walking in this patient group, in order to support clinical decision-making.

Objectives: To review the evidence for the effects of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) for improving walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders.

Search methods: On 10 February 2023, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP.

Selection criteria: We looked for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including randomised cross-over studies and quasi-RCTs, and non-randomised studies (NRSs) that examined the effects of AFO interventions compared with shoes-only walking in adults with calf muscle weakness due to neuromuscular disorders.

Data collection and analysis: We used the methodological procedures described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We summarised findings for the primary outcome (objectively measured walking effort, assessed as walking energy cost) and secondary outcomes (perceived walking effort, physical mobility, gait parameters, AFO use, satisfaction with the AFO, and adverse events). We grouped results according to the type of AFO material and synthesised them in meta-analysis where possible. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of the evidence.

Main results: We included four randomised cross-over studies and six NRSs with 186 participants in total (the smallest study had 8 participants and the largest had 37). All studies were designed as self-controlled studies and examined the effects of custom-made and/or prefabricated AFOs. The AFOs were made of carbon (5 studies), polypropylene (5 studies), silicone (1 study), metal (1 study), elastic materials (2 studies), or leather combined with other materials (1 study). Outcome measures with AFOs were assessed during a single session (in some studies, people already used the study AFO in daily life), when the AFO was delivered, or at three-week or three-month follow-up. We judged one study to be at moderate risk of bias, and nine studies to be at high or serious risk of bias, primarily due to bias arising from period and carryover effects, selection bias, the inability to blind participants and assessors, missing data, and selective reporting. We found that carbon AFOs may reduce walking energy cost (mean difference (MD) -0.86 J/kg/m, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.33 to -0.39; 2 studies, 45 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may increase walking speed (MD 0.19 m/s, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.27; 4 studies, 71 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to shoes-only walking. We found that leather AFOs may increase walking speed (MD 0.25 m/s, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.43; 1 study, 11 participants; low-certainty evidence). Little or no effect on walking speed was found with polypropylene AFOs (MD 0.00 m/s, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.11; 2 studies, 25 participants; low-certainty evidence) and elastic AFOs (MD 0.03 m/s, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.18; 1 study, 14 participants; low-certainty evidence). Carbon AFOs may also enhance satisfaction while walking (1 study, 16 participants; low-certainty evidence). We were unable to draw conclusions about perceived walking effort (one study, 8 participants), balance (two studies, 21 participants), and AFO use (two studies, 51 participants), as the evidence is very uncertain. Finally, two studies (45 participants) reported on adverse events (low-certainty evidence).

Authors' conclusions: The available evidence for ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) to improve walking in adults with calf muscle weakness comes from a limited number of small studies with heterogeneity in intervention characteristics and outcome assessment, and is of low to very low certainty. The evidence suggests that carbon AFOs may reduce walking energy cost (effort), increase walking speed, and enhance satisfaction, and leather AFOs may increase walking speed, while polypropylene and elastic AFOs may make little or no difference to walking speed. We are unable to draw conclusions about the effects of AFOs on perceived walking effort, balance, and use. Nor can we draw conclusions about adverse effects of using AFOs. The variety in the findings for AFOs made of different materials suggests further investigation is warranted to explore how different AFO materials impact walking improvement in people with calf muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信