Dirk-Melle Beek, Bo Berends, Frank Baan, Jeroen Liebregts, Kasper Stokbro, Tong Xi
{"title":"患者体位和全身麻醉对正颌手术中髁突位置和手术精度的影响。","authors":"Dirk-Melle Beek, Bo Berends, Frank Baan, Jeroen Liebregts, Kasper Stokbro, Tong Xi","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06055-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effect of patient positioning and general anesthesia on the condylar position in orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study included patients undergoing orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2020. Four weeks prior to surgery (T0) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and intra-oral scans (IOS) were acquired in an upright position. Additionally, two IOS were acquired in the operating theatre, one before (T1) and one after (T2) general anaesthesia in supine position. The condylar position was analysed by matching the mandible from CBCT data with IOS at T1, T2 and T3, calculating the spatial differences at the level of lateral condylar points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 32 patients, patient positioning and general anesthesia on condylar position significantly affected condylar position. In supine position, the condyles moved primarily in the cranial direction by 0.94 ± 0.92 mm (p < 0.01). After anesthesia, the condyles moved posteriorly by 0.20 ± 0.45 mm (p = 0.02). These changes in condylar position resulted in the occlusal plane of the mandible being positioned more cranially (2.31 ± 2.61 mm; p < 0.01), anteriorly (0.70 ± 1.32 mm; p = 0.04), and counterclockwisely pitched (-1.42 ± 2.25°; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that both supine position and general anesthesia significantly influenced the condylar position, the mandibular position, and, subsequently, the surgical accuracy of orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Surgeons should take these effects into consideration when planning orthognathic surgery as this might lead to under- or overcorrections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences of patient positioning and general anesthesia on condylar position and surgical accuracy in orthognathic surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Dirk-Melle Beek, Bo Berends, Frank Baan, Jeroen Liebregts, Kasper Stokbro, Tong Xi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-024-06055-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effect of patient positioning and general anesthesia on the condylar position in orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study included patients undergoing orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2020. Four weeks prior to surgery (T0) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and intra-oral scans (IOS) were acquired in an upright position. Additionally, two IOS were acquired in the operating theatre, one before (T1) and one after (T2) general anaesthesia in supine position. The condylar position was analysed by matching the mandible from CBCT data with IOS at T1, T2 and T3, calculating the spatial differences at the level of lateral condylar points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 32 patients, patient positioning and general anesthesia on condylar position significantly affected condylar position. In supine position, the condyles moved primarily in the cranial direction by 0.94 ± 0.92 mm (p < 0.01). After anesthesia, the condyles moved posteriorly by 0.20 ± 0.45 mm (p = 0.02). These changes in condylar position resulted in the occlusal plane of the mandible being positioned more cranially (2.31 ± 2.61 mm; p < 0.01), anteriorly (0.70 ± 1.32 mm; p = 0.04), and counterclockwisely pitched (-1.42 ± 2.25°; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that both supine position and general anesthesia significantly influenced the condylar position, the mandibular position, and, subsequently, the surgical accuracy of orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Surgeons should take these effects into consideration when planning orthognathic surgery as this might lead to under- or overcorrections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06055-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06055-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨患者体位和全身麻醉对正颌手术中髁突位置的影响。材料和方法:本前瞻性研究纳入了2019年至2020年接受正颌手术的患者。术前4周(T0)以直立姿势进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口内扫描(IOS)。此外,在手术室内获得2例IOS, 1例全麻前(T1), 1例全麻后(T2),均为仰卧位。将下颌骨CBCT数据与T1、T2和T3的IOS数据进行匹配,计算髁突外侧点水平的空间差异,分析髁突位置。结果:32例患者中,患者体位和全身麻醉对髁突位置有明显影响。仰卧位时,髁突主要向颅方向移动0.94±0.92 mm (p)。结论:本研究表明,仰卧位和全身麻醉均显著影响髁突位置、下颌位置,进而影响正颌手术的手术精度。临床相关性:外科医生在计划正颌手术时应考虑到这些影响,因为这可能导致矫正不足或矫正过度。
Influences of patient positioning and general anesthesia on condylar position and surgical accuracy in orthognathic surgery.
Objectives: To assess the effect of patient positioning and general anesthesia on the condylar position in orthognathic surgery.
Materials and methods: This prospective study included patients undergoing orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2020. Four weeks prior to surgery (T0) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and intra-oral scans (IOS) were acquired in an upright position. Additionally, two IOS were acquired in the operating theatre, one before (T1) and one after (T2) general anaesthesia in supine position. The condylar position was analysed by matching the mandible from CBCT data with IOS at T1, T2 and T3, calculating the spatial differences at the level of lateral condylar points.
Results: Based on 32 patients, patient positioning and general anesthesia on condylar position significantly affected condylar position. In supine position, the condyles moved primarily in the cranial direction by 0.94 ± 0.92 mm (p < 0.01). After anesthesia, the condyles moved posteriorly by 0.20 ± 0.45 mm (p = 0.02). These changes in condylar position resulted in the occlusal plane of the mandible being positioned more cranially (2.31 ± 2.61 mm; p < 0.01), anteriorly (0.70 ± 1.32 mm; p = 0.04), and counterclockwisely pitched (-1.42 ± 2.25°; p = 0.02).
Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that both supine position and general anesthesia significantly influenced the condylar position, the mandibular position, and, subsequently, the surgical accuracy of orthognathic surgery.
Clinical relevance: Surgeons should take these effects into consideration when planning orthognathic surgery as this might lead to under- or overcorrections.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.