Xiang Li, Chao Wei, Yuefei Wu, Xiang Gao, Jie Sun, Tianqi Xu, Chushuang Chen, Qing Yang, Mark W Parsons, Yi Huang, Jianhong Yang, Longting Lin
{"title":"急性缺血性脑卒中的灌注图像辅助治疗决策:临床决策支持系统的验证。","authors":"Xiang Li, Chao Wei, Yuefei Wu, Xiang Gao, Jie Sun, Tianqi Xu, Chushuang Chen, Qing Yang, Mark W Parsons, Yi Huang, Jianhong Yang, Longting Lin","doi":"10.1159/000543142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our collaborative team has previously developed a prognostic model for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This model, known as the clinical decision support system (CDSS), aims to provide personalized assistance to clinicians in making treatment decisions and improving patient prognosis. The objective of this study was to externally validate the model using Chinese AIS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All enrolled patients arrived at the hospital within 24 hours after stroke onset. The primary outcome was the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) < 2 at 90 days. The model's predictive performance was evaluated by assessing its discriminative power (area under the curve, AUC) and calibration power (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, Brier score).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation cohort of 298 patients, the model demonstrated a moderate discriminatory ability to predict a favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-1), with an AUC of 0.805 (95% CI, 0.756-0.849). The calibration performance of the model was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-squared test, yielding a value of 9.211 and a p-value of 0.325 additionally, the Brier score for the prediction of a good outcome was 0.153, further supporting the model's good calibration performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study introduces the CDSS that integrates clinical baseline data and imaging indicators of brain perfusion status. This CDSS provides clinicians with an intuitive risk assessment of different treatment strategies for AIS patients. Moreover, the CDSS highlights substantial variations in treatment outcomes among patients, suggesting that it has the potential to significantly enhance personalized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perfusion image-aided treatment decision for acute ischemic stroke: validation of a clinical decision support system.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Li, Chao Wei, Yuefei Wu, Xiang Gao, Jie Sun, Tianqi Xu, Chushuang Chen, Qing Yang, Mark W Parsons, Yi Huang, Jianhong Yang, Longting Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our collaborative team has previously developed a prognostic model for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This model, known as the clinical decision support system (CDSS), aims to provide personalized assistance to clinicians in making treatment decisions and improving patient prognosis. The objective of this study was to externally validate the model using Chinese AIS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All enrolled patients arrived at the hospital within 24 hours after stroke onset. The primary outcome was the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) < 2 at 90 days. The model's predictive performance was evaluated by assessing its discriminative power (area under the curve, AUC) and calibration power (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, Brier score).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation cohort of 298 patients, the model demonstrated a moderate discriminatory ability to predict a favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-1), with an AUC of 0.805 (95% CI, 0.756-0.849). The calibration performance of the model was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-squared test, yielding a value of 9.211 and a p-value of 0.325 additionally, the Brier score for the prediction of a good outcome was 0.153, further supporting the model's good calibration performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study introduces the CDSS that integrates clinical baseline data and imaging indicators of brain perfusion status. This CDSS provides clinicians with an intuitive risk assessment of different treatment strategies for AIS patients. Moreover, the CDSS highlights substantial variations in treatment outcomes among patients, suggesting that it has the potential to significantly enhance personalized treatment approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543142\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perfusion image-aided treatment decision for acute ischemic stroke: validation of a clinical decision support system.
Introduction: Our collaborative team has previously developed a prognostic model for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This model, known as the clinical decision support system (CDSS), aims to provide personalized assistance to clinicians in making treatment decisions and improving patient prognosis. The objective of this study was to externally validate the model using Chinese AIS patients.
Methods: All enrolled patients arrived at the hospital within 24 hours after stroke onset. The primary outcome was the likelihood of a favorable functional outcome, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) < 2 at 90 days. The model's predictive performance was evaluated by assessing its discriminative power (area under the curve, AUC) and calibration power (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, Brier score).
Results: In the validation cohort of 298 patients, the model demonstrated a moderate discriminatory ability to predict a favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-1), with an AUC of 0.805 (95% CI, 0.756-0.849). The calibration performance of the model was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-squared test, yielding a value of 9.211 and a p-value of 0.325 additionally, the Brier score for the prediction of a good outcome was 0.153, further supporting the model's good calibration performance.
Conclusion: The study introduces the CDSS that integrates clinical baseline data and imaging indicators of brain perfusion status. This CDSS provides clinicians with an intuitive risk assessment of different treatment strategies for AIS patients. Moreover, the CDSS highlights substantial variations in treatment outcomes among patients, suggesting that it has the potential to significantly enhance personalized treatment approaches.
期刊介绍:
A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.