既往胸部放疗患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的早期和晚期结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Andreas Tzoumas, Ioannis Kyriakoulis, Athina Ntoumaziou, Marios Sagris, Polydoros N Kampaktsis
{"title":"既往胸部放疗患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的早期和晚期结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Andreas Tzoumas, Ioannis Kyriakoulis, Athina Ntoumaziou, Marios Sagris, Polydoros N Kampaktsis","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with prior history of chest or mediastinal radiation are deemed high risk for surgical AVR. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a promising alternative for these patients, however, this patient population was underrepresented in prior TAVR trials.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the outcomes of TAVR in patients with versus without a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Systematic search of electronic databases was conducted up to September 2023. We compared early and late mortality as well as complications. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I-square statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 6358 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients undergoing TAVR in the radiation group had a higher risk for heart failure exacerbation (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.18-3.59) and aortic valve reintervention (OR: 5.68; 95% CI: 1.83-17.67) in the early postoperative period compared to the nonradiation group. Analysis revealed similar short-term (in-hospital or 30-day) all-cause-mortality (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 0.89-2.98) between the two groups. Other perioperative complications including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pacemaker insertion requirement, major bleeding as well as access-related complications were not significantly different between the two groups. TAVR in the radiation group was not associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to the nonradiation group (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.93-2.11) after a mean follow-up of 17.6 months. Other endpoints including MI, stroke, need for pacemaker insertion, heart failure readmission rate, and need for aortic valve reintervention were similar in the mid-term follow-up between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAVR in patients with a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with similar short-term and mid-term mortality compared to patients without radiation. The history of chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with more frequent heart failure hospitalizations and aortic valve reintervention in the postoperative period. No difference was found in mid-term complications. Future studies are warranted to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early and Late Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Chest Radiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Tzoumas, Ioannis Kyriakoulis, Athina Ntoumaziou, Marios Sagris, Polydoros N Kampaktsis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with prior history of chest or mediastinal radiation are deemed high risk for surgical AVR. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a promising alternative for these patients, however, this patient population was underrepresented in prior TAVR trials.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the outcomes of TAVR in patients with versus without a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Systematic search of electronic databases was conducted up to September 2023. We compared early and late mortality as well as complications. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I-square statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 6358 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients undergoing TAVR in the radiation group had a higher risk for heart failure exacerbation (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.18-3.59) and aortic valve reintervention (OR: 5.68; 95% CI: 1.83-17.67) in the early postoperative period compared to the nonradiation group. Analysis revealed similar short-term (in-hospital or 30-day) all-cause-mortality (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 0.89-2.98) between the two groups. Other perioperative complications including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pacemaker insertion requirement, major bleeding as well as access-related complications were not significantly different between the two groups. TAVR in the radiation group was not associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to the nonradiation group (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.93-2.11) after a mean follow-up of 17.6 months. Other endpoints including MI, stroke, need for pacemaker insertion, heart failure readmission rate, and need for aortic valve reintervention were similar in the mid-term follow-up between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAVR in patients with a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with similar short-term and mid-term mortality compared to patients without radiation. The history of chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with more frequent heart failure hospitalizations and aortic valve reintervention in the postoperative period. No difference was found in mid-term complications. Future studies are warranted to validate our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:既往有胸部或纵隔放射史的患者被认为是外科AVR的高风险患者。经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为这些患者的一个有希望的替代方案,然而,这一患者群体在先前的TAVR试验中代表性不足。目的:比较有或没有胸部或纵隔放射史的TAVR患者的预后。方法:本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。系统地检索电子资料库,直至二零二三年九月为止。我们比较了早期和晚期死亡率以及并发症。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。采用i平方统计量来评估异质性。结果:本荟萃分析纳入了7项研究,包括6358例患者。放疗组接受TAVR的患者发生心力衰竭加重的风险更高(OR: 2.06;95% CI: 1.18-3.59)和主动脉瓣再介入治疗(OR: 5.68;95% CI: 1.83-17.67),术后早期与非放疗组比较。分析显示相似的短期(住院或30天)全因死亡率(or: 1.63;95% CI: 0.89-2.98)。其他围手术期并发症包括心肌梗死(MI)、卒中、起搏器插入要求、大出血及通路相关并发症两组间无显著差异。与非放疗组相比,放疗组的TAVR与全因死亡率增加无关(OR: 1.40;95% CI: 0.93-2.11),平均随访17.6个月。其他终点包括心肌梗塞、卒中、起搏器插入需求、心力衰竭再入院率和主动脉瓣再干预需求在两组中期随访中相似。结论:与未接受放射治疗的患者相比,有胸部或纵隔放射史的患者的TAVR与相似的短期和中期死亡率相关。胸部或纵隔放射史与术后心力衰竭住院和主动脉瓣再干预的发生率相关。中期并发症无明显差异。未来的研究将证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early and Late Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Chest Radiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Patients with prior history of chest or mediastinal radiation are deemed high risk for surgical AVR. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a promising alternative for these patients, however, this patient population was underrepresented in prior TAVR trials.

Aims: To compare the outcomes of TAVR in patients with versus without a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation.

Methods: This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Systematic search of electronic databases was conducted up to September 2023. We compared early and late mortality as well as complications. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I-square statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.

Results: Seven studies comprising 6358 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients undergoing TAVR in the radiation group had a higher risk for heart failure exacerbation (OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.18-3.59) and aortic valve reintervention (OR: 5.68; 95% CI: 1.83-17.67) in the early postoperative period compared to the nonradiation group. Analysis revealed similar short-term (in-hospital or 30-day) all-cause-mortality (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 0.89-2.98) between the two groups. Other perioperative complications including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pacemaker insertion requirement, major bleeding as well as access-related complications were not significantly different between the two groups. TAVR in the radiation group was not associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to the nonradiation group (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.93-2.11) after a mean follow-up of 17.6 months. Other endpoints including MI, stroke, need for pacemaker insertion, heart failure readmission rate, and need for aortic valve reintervention were similar in the mid-term follow-up between the two groups.

Conclusion: TAVR in patients with a history of prior chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with similar short-term and mid-term mortality compared to patients without radiation. The history of chest or mediastinal radiation was associated with more frequent heart failure hospitalizations and aortic valve reintervention in the postoperative period. No difference was found in mid-term complications. Future studies are warranted to validate our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信