经皮冷冻消融治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Letícia Helena Kaça do Carmo, Stephanie Brito Ceolin de Faria, Marília da Cruz Fagundes, Laura Costa de Oliveira Lima, Sarah Verdan Moreira, Guilherme Strieder de Oliveira, Renata Vidal Leão, Emanuela Mendes Junqueira de Barros, Miriana Mariussi, Lucas Moretti Monsignore, Daniel Giansante Abud
{"title":"经皮冷冻消融治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Letícia Helena Kaça do Carmo, Stephanie Brito Ceolin de Faria, Marília da Cruz Fagundes, Laura Costa de Oliveira Lima, Sarah Verdan Moreira, Guilherme Strieder de Oliveira, Renata Vidal Leão, Emanuela Mendes Junqueira de Barros, Miriana Mariussi, Lucas Moretti Monsignore, Daniel Giansante Abud","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) consists of endometrial tissue between the peritoneum and the abdominal wall. The established treatment involves amenorrheic drugs-not always successful and tolerated-or invasive surgery. In this scenario, minimally invasive techniques such as cryoablation are a potential option. In this study, we primarily aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation in reducing pain scores of AWE patients and analyze their satisfaction with the procedure and its related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane's databases were systematically searched for studies that employed percutaneous cryoablation therapy for AWE and reported any of the outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment. R Software was used for the statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions framework assessed potential bias in each selected study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4 studies, containing 126 patients. All articles were retrospective studies. The difference between the VAS scores before and after treatment was on average 5.97 points (95% CI 5.42-6.52; P <.01; I2 = 0%). The pooled satisfaction rate among patients in the selected studies was 93.1% (95% CI 88.66-97.34; P = .51; I2 = 0%). The pooled prevalence of adverse events was only 5.48% (95% CI 1.71-11.20; P = .58; I2 = 0%). Bias analysis showed an overall moderate risk in all included articles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that cryoablation could reduce pain complaints in patients, while presenting a low incidence rate of adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials with a larger number of patients are necessary for greater conclusions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>(1) AWE affects about 3.5% of women. The standard treatment is invasive surgery. (2) This meta-analysis demonstrated that cryoablation can effectively reduce pain scores while presenting a low rate of adverse effects. (3) Cryoablation is a feasible treatment for AWE, furthermore allowing shorter hospital stays and few complications for the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"345-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous cryoablation therapy for abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Letícia Helena Kaça do Carmo, Stephanie Brito Ceolin de Faria, Marília da Cruz Fagundes, Laura Costa de Oliveira Lima, Sarah Verdan Moreira, Guilherme Strieder de Oliveira, Renata Vidal Leão, Emanuela Mendes Junqueira de Barros, Miriana Mariussi, Lucas Moretti Monsignore, Daniel Giansante Abud\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) consists of endometrial tissue between the peritoneum and the abdominal wall. The established treatment involves amenorrheic drugs-not always successful and tolerated-or invasive surgery. In this scenario, minimally invasive techniques such as cryoablation are a potential option. In this study, we primarily aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation in reducing pain scores of AWE patients and analyze their satisfaction with the procedure and its related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane's databases were systematically searched for studies that employed percutaneous cryoablation therapy for AWE and reported any of the outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment. R Software was used for the statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions framework assessed potential bias in each selected study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4 studies, containing 126 patients. All articles were retrospective studies. The difference between the VAS scores before and after treatment was on average 5.97 points (95% CI 5.42-6.52; P <.01; I2 = 0%). The pooled satisfaction rate among patients in the selected studies was 93.1% (95% CI 88.66-97.34; P = .51; I2 = 0%). The pooled prevalence of adverse events was only 5.48% (95% CI 1.71-11.20; P = .58; I2 = 0%). Bias analysis showed an overall moderate risk in all included articles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that cryoablation could reduce pain complaints in patients, while presenting a low incidence rate of adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials with a larger number of patients are necessary for greater conclusions.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>(1) AWE affects about 3.5% of women. The standard treatment is invasive surgery. (2) This meta-analysis demonstrated that cryoablation can effectively reduce pain scores while presenting a low rate of adverse effects. (3) Cryoablation is a feasible treatment for AWE, furthermore allowing shorter hospital stays and few complications for the patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"345-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹壁子宫内膜异位症由腹膜和腹壁之间的子宫内膜组织组成。现有的治疗方法包括使用闭经药物(并不总是成功和耐受)或侵入性手术。在这种情况下,微创技术如冷冻消融是一个潜在的选择。在本研究中,我们主要旨在评估经皮冷冻消融对降低腹壁子宫内膜异位症患者疼痛评分的疗效,并分析他们对手术的满意度及其相关不良事件。材料和方法:系统地检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,寻找经皮冷冻消融治疗腹壁子宫内膜异位症的研究,并报告任何感兴趣的结果。主要结果是治疗后视觉模拟量表评分的降低。采用R软件进行统计分析。采用I2统计量评估异质性。非随机研究的偏倚风险-干预框架评估了每个选定研究的潜在偏倚。结果:我们纳入4项研究,共126例患者。所有文章均为回顾性研究。治疗前后视觉模拟量表评分平均差5.97分(95% CI 5.42 ~ 6.52;结论:我们的研究表明,冷冻消融可以减少患者的疼痛主诉,同时不良反应发生率低。为了得到更大的结论,有必要进行大量患者的随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous cryoablation therapy for abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) consists of endometrial tissue between the peritoneum and the abdominal wall. The established treatment involves amenorrheic drugs-not always successful and tolerated-or invasive surgery. In this scenario, minimally invasive techniques such as cryoablation are a potential option. In this study, we primarily aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation in reducing pain scores of AWE patients and analyze their satisfaction with the procedure and its related adverse events.

Materials and methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane's databases were systematically searched for studies that employed percutaneous cryoablation therapy for AWE and reported any of the outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment. R Software was used for the statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions framework assessed potential bias in each selected study.

Results: We included 4 studies, containing 126 patients. All articles were retrospective studies. The difference between the VAS scores before and after treatment was on average 5.97 points (95% CI 5.42-6.52; P <.01; I2 = 0%). The pooled satisfaction rate among patients in the selected studies was 93.1% (95% CI 88.66-97.34; P = .51; I2 = 0%). The pooled prevalence of adverse events was only 5.48% (95% CI 1.71-11.20; P = .58; I2 = 0%). Bias analysis showed an overall moderate risk in all included articles.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that cryoablation could reduce pain complaints in patients, while presenting a low incidence rate of adverse effects. Randomized clinical trials with a larger number of patients are necessary for greater conclusions.

Advances in knowledge: (1) AWE affects about 3.5% of women. The standard treatment is invasive surgery. (2) This meta-analysis demonstrated that cryoablation can effectively reduce pain scores while presenting a low rate of adverse effects. (3) Cryoablation is a feasible treatment for AWE, furthermore allowing shorter hospital stays and few complications for the patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信