IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-30 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0357
Thomas J Mroczek, Shahzad Ahmed, Thim Yung Chan, John Zajac, Romaih Al-Idari, Anukiran Ravichandran
{"title":"Ruptured: Retrospective Analysis Undertaken for Patients Treated for Unexplained Retroperitoneal or Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Thomas J Mroczek, Shahzad Ahmed, Thim Yung Chan, John Zajac, Romaih Al-Idari, Anukiran Ravichandran","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms carry significant mortality risk. This is supplemented by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine guidelines which suggest imaging for patients 50 years of age or older presenting with unexplained abdominal, flank, or back pain. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and mortality rates of patients with symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms in a high-risk population and to assess scanning rates in the accident and emergency department. <b>Methods</b> Retrospective analysis of patients presenting to the accident and emergency department at a district general hospital over 6 months was performed. Patients 50 years of age or older presenting with abdominal, flank, or back pain were included. Collected data points included; whether or not a scan was performed in the emergency department, the modality of imaging, whether an abdominal aortic aneurysm was identified on the scan, the age of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysms identified on the scan, size of the identified abdominal aortic aneurysms, primary diagnosis at the time of review in the emergency department, and all-cause mortality rates. <b>Results</b> 361 patients were identified to have an indicated scan, of which only 122 (33.8%) had a scan in the emergency department. In the syndromic group, the prevalence and 30-day mortality of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm were 5.5% and 1.1% respectively. Only 12 out of 20 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm were identified in the emergency department. <b>Conclusion</b> The criteria outlined by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine does well at identifying patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms when followed. However, this study reveals that scanning rates in the emergency department are low. The encouragement of scanning and improved ultrasound skills among emergency medicine clinicians can reduce missed diagnoses. Additionally, we recommend further studies to assess the mortality rates of emergent abdominal aortic aneurysm presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"85 12","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景有症状的腹主动脉瘤具有显著的死亡风险。英国皇家急诊医学院的指导方针补充了这一点,建议50岁或以上出现不明原因的腹部、腹部或背部疼痛的患者进行影像学检查。本研究旨在评估高危人群中有症状的腹主动脉瘤患者的患病率和死亡率,并评估急诊科的扫描率。方法对某地区综合医院急诊科收治的6个月以上患者进行回顾性分析。患者年龄≥50岁,表现为腹部、侧腹或背部疼痛。收集的数据点包括;是否在急诊科进行扫描,成像方式,扫描是否发现腹主动脉瘤,扫描发现腹主动脉瘤患者的年龄,发现的腹主动脉瘤的大小,在急诊科复查时的初步诊断,以及全因死亡率。结果361例患者接受了指征性扫描,其中122例(33.8%)在急诊科接受了扫描。在综合征组中,腹主动脉瘤的患病率和30天死亡率分别为5.5%和1.1%。20例腹主动脉瘤患者中只有12例在急诊科确诊。结论由英国皇家急诊医学院制定的标准在随访时能够很好地识别腹主动脉瘤患者。然而,本研究显示急诊科的扫描率很低。鼓励急诊医师使用扫描和提高超声技术可以减少漏诊。此外,我们建议进一步研究评估急诊腹主动脉瘤的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ruptured: Retrospective Analysis Undertaken for Patients Treated for Unexplained Retroperitoneal or Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department.

Aims/Background Symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms carry significant mortality risk. This is supplemented by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine guidelines which suggest imaging for patients 50 years of age or older presenting with unexplained abdominal, flank, or back pain. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and mortality rates of patients with symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms in a high-risk population and to assess scanning rates in the accident and emergency department. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients presenting to the accident and emergency department at a district general hospital over 6 months was performed. Patients 50 years of age or older presenting with abdominal, flank, or back pain were included. Collected data points included; whether or not a scan was performed in the emergency department, the modality of imaging, whether an abdominal aortic aneurysm was identified on the scan, the age of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysms identified on the scan, size of the identified abdominal aortic aneurysms, primary diagnosis at the time of review in the emergency department, and all-cause mortality rates. Results 361 patients were identified to have an indicated scan, of which only 122 (33.8%) had a scan in the emergency department. In the syndromic group, the prevalence and 30-day mortality of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm were 5.5% and 1.1% respectively. Only 12 out of 20 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm were identified in the emergency department. Conclusion The criteria outlined by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine does well at identifying patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms when followed. However, this study reveals that scanning rates in the emergency department are low. The encouragement of scanning and improved ultrasound skills among emergency medicine clinicians can reduce missed diagnoses. Additionally, we recommend further studies to assess the mortality rates of emergent abdominal aortic aneurysm presentations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信