基于4种常用营养分析软件包建立多元回归方程并进行评价,以预测生长/育肥猪和成年猪饲粮的代谢能密度及其在大鼠和小鼠饲粮中的应用。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Graham Tobin, Annette Schuhmacher, Tomasz Górecki, Łukasz Smaga
{"title":"基于4种常用营养分析软件包建立多元回归方程并进行评价,以预测生长/育肥猪和成年猪饲粮的代谢能密度及其在大鼠和小鼠饲粮中的应用。","authors":"Graham Tobin, Annette Schuhmacher, Tomasz Górecki, Łukasz Smaga","doi":"10.1017/S0007114525000042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have used multiple regression analyses to develop a series of metabolisable energy prediction equations from chemical analyses of pig diets that can be extended to murine diets. We compiled four datasets from an extensive range of published metabolism studies with grower/finisher and adult pigs. The analytes in the datasets were increasingly complex, comprising (1) the proximate or Weende analysis, (2) the previous analysis but with neutral detergent fibre replacing crude fibre, (3) the neutral detergent fibre package plus starch and (4) the neutral detergent fibre package plus starch and sugars. Diet manufacturers routinely provide most of the analytes for batches of murine diet, or they are easily obtainable. The study uniquely compares the four analytical packages side by side. The number of records in the datasets varies from 367 to 827. With increasing analytical complexity, adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values for metabolisable energy prediction improved from 0·751 to 0·869 and the mean absolute error from 0·422 to 0·289 kJ/g. Overall, the models' prediction interval improved from 1 to 0·7 kJ/g, which is ± 7 to 5 % for a typical dietary metabolisable energy density of 14·8 kJ/g. Although prediction accuracy increases as one extends the range and complexity of the analytes measured, the improvement is slight and may not justify the substantial increase in analytical cost. The equations were validated for use on future datasets by <i>k</i>-fold analysis. Although the equations are developed from pig data, they are suitable for rat and mouse diets, based on comparable digestibility measurements, and substantially improve existing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development and evaluation of multiple regression equations based on four common nutritional analysis packages to predict the metabolisable energy density of diets fed to grower/finisher and adult pigs and their use for rat and mouse diets.\",\"authors\":\"Graham Tobin, Annette Schuhmacher, Tomasz Górecki, Łukasz Smaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0007114525000042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We have used multiple regression analyses to develop a series of metabolisable energy prediction equations from chemical analyses of pig diets that can be extended to murine diets. We compiled four datasets from an extensive range of published metabolism studies with grower/finisher and adult pigs. The analytes in the datasets were increasingly complex, comprising (1) the proximate or Weende analysis, (2) the previous analysis but with neutral detergent fibre replacing crude fibre, (3) the neutral detergent fibre package plus starch and (4) the neutral detergent fibre package plus starch and sugars. Diet manufacturers routinely provide most of the analytes for batches of murine diet, or they are easily obtainable. The study uniquely compares the four analytical packages side by side. The number of records in the datasets varies from 367 to 827. With increasing analytical complexity, adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values for metabolisable energy prediction improved from 0·751 to 0·869 and the mean absolute error from 0·422 to 0·289 kJ/g. Overall, the models' prediction interval improved from 1 to 0·7 kJ/g, which is ± 7 to 5 % for a typical dietary metabolisable energy density of 14·8 kJ/g. Although prediction accuracy increases as one extends the range and complexity of the analytes measured, the improvement is slight and may not justify the substantial increase in analytical cost. The equations were validated for use on future datasets by <i>k</i>-fold analysis. Although the equations are developed from pig data, they are suitable for rat and mouse diets, based on comparable digestibility measurements, and substantially improve existing methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114525000042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114525000042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用多元回归分析,从猪日粮的化学分析中建立了一系列代谢能(ME)预测方程,可以推广到小鼠日粮中。我们从已发表的关于生长/育肥猪和成年猪的代谢研究中收集了四个数据集。数据集中的分析物越来越复杂,包括:1。近似或Weende分析;2 .用中性洗涤纤维(NDF)代替粗纤维;NDF包加淀粉,4。NDF包装加上淀粉和糖饲料制造商通常会提供多数小鼠饲料批次的分析物,或者这些分析物很容易获得。该研究独特地比较了四种分析包并排。数据集中的记录数从367到827不等。随着分析复杂度的增加,ME预测的调整R2值从0.751提高到0.869,平均绝对误差从0.422提高到0.289 kJ/g。总体而言,模型的预测区间(PI)从1提高到0.7 kJ/g,在典型日粮代谢能密度为14.8 kJ/g时,PI提高了±7% ~ 5%。虽然预测的准确性随着测量分析物的范围和复杂性的增加而增加,但这种改善是轻微的,可能不能证明分析成本的大幅增加是合理的。通过k-fold分析验证了这些方程在未来数据集上的使用。虽然这些公式是根据猪的数据开发的,但基于可比的消化率测量,它们适用于大鼠和小鼠的日粮,并大大改进了现有的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The development and evaluation of multiple regression equations based on four common nutritional analysis packages to predict the metabolisable energy density of diets fed to grower/finisher and adult pigs and their use for rat and mouse diets.

We have used multiple regression analyses to develop a series of metabolisable energy prediction equations from chemical analyses of pig diets that can be extended to murine diets. We compiled four datasets from an extensive range of published metabolism studies with grower/finisher and adult pigs. The analytes in the datasets were increasingly complex, comprising (1) the proximate or Weende analysis, (2) the previous analysis but with neutral detergent fibre replacing crude fibre, (3) the neutral detergent fibre package plus starch and (4) the neutral detergent fibre package plus starch and sugars. Diet manufacturers routinely provide most of the analytes for batches of murine diet, or they are easily obtainable. The study uniquely compares the four analytical packages side by side. The number of records in the datasets varies from 367 to 827. With increasing analytical complexity, adjusted R2 values for metabolisable energy prediction improved from 0·751 to 0·869 and the mean absolute error from 0·422 to 0·289 kJ/g. Overall, the models' prediction interval improved from 1 to 0·7 kJ/g, which is ± 7 to 5 % for a typical dietary metabolisable energy density of 14·8 kJ/g. Although prediction accuracy increases as one extends the range and complexity of the analytes measured, the improvement is slight and may not justify the substantial increase in analytical cost. The equations were validated for use on future datasets by k-fold analysis. Although the equations are developed from pig data, they are suitable for rat and mouse diets, based on comparable digestibility measurements, and substantially improve existing methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信