Paola Zagami , Angela Esposito , Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni , Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti , Roberta Scafetta , Matteo Lambertini , Massimo Di Maio , Giuseppe Curigliano , Carmen Criscitiello , Saverio Cinieri
{"title":"推进治疗选择:CDK4/6抑制剂在HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌中的转换","authors":"Paola Zagami , Angela Esposito , Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni , Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti , Roberta Scafetta , Matteo Lambertini , Massimo Di Maio , Giuseppe Curigliano , Carmen Criscitiello , Saverio Cinieri","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.103875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) use has revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. The choice of a specific CDK4/6i may be influenced by adverse events (AEs). Recently, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) approved the possibility of switching between CDK4/6i for unacceptable toxicity. This study explores oncologists' experiences and future perspectives on CDK4/6 inhibitor switching following this new approval.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>With the support of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), we conducted a survey among 92 oncologists to assess the impact of AIFA's approval on patient management.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey showed that 48 % of participants were not surprised regarding AIFA's decision, with 76 % of respondents believing that this opportunity would significantly influence their treatment choices, enhancing AEs management for patients. Yet, 49 % of respondents emphasized the need for more real world evidence on CDK4/6i switch safety and efficacy. 96 % of respondents reported discontinuation rates between 0% and 25 % of patients, with constipation and hematological toxicity being the most frequent treatment discontinuation reasons. The oncologists prescribing CDK4/6i switch reported that most of these patients were in first line treatment (85 %) and the most common second CDK4/6i most frequently initiated was palbociclib (69 %), then abemaciclib (17 %) and ribociclib (14 %). Among those who started the second CDK4/6i at full dosage, 66 % of patients didn't require a dose reduction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our survey highlights the importance of allowing CDK4/6i switching, thus likely prompting oncologists to adapt their treatment choices, leading to better AEs management for improving patients’ outcome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103875"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing treatment choices: CDK4/6 inhibitor switching in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Paola Zagami , Angela Esposito , Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni , Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti , Roberta Scafetta , Matteo Lambertini , Massimo Di Maio , Giuseppe Curigliano , Carmen Criscitiello , Saverio Cinieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.breast.2025.103875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) use has revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. The choice of a specific CDK4/6i may be influenced by adverse events (AEs). Recently, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) approved the possibility of switching between CDK4/6i for unacceptable toxicity. This study explores oncologists' experiences and future perspectives on CDK4/6 inhibitor switching following this new approval.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>With the support of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), we conducted a survey among 92 oncologists to assess the impact of AIFA's approval on patient management.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey showed that 48 % of participants were not surprised regarding AIFA's decision, with 76 % of respondents believing that this opportunity would significantly influence their treatment choices, enhancing AEs management for patients. Yet, 49 % of respondents emphasized the need for more real world evidence on CDK4/6i switch safety and efficacy. 96 % of respondents reported discontinuation rates between 0% and 25 % of patients, with constipation and hematological toxicity being the most frequent treatment discontinuation reasons. The oncologists prescribing CDK4/6i switch reported that most of these patients were in first line treatment (85 %) and the most common second CDK4/6i most frequently initiated was palbociclib (69 %), then abemaciclib (17 %) and ribociclib (14 %). Among those who started the second CDK4/6i at full dosage, 66 % of patients didn't require a dose reduction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our survey highlights the importance of allowing CDK4/6i switching, thus likely prompting oncologists to adapt their treatment choices, leading to better AEs management for improving patients’ outcome.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786079/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977625000049\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977625000049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing treatment choices: CDK4/6 inhibitor switching in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer
Purpose
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) use has revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. The choice of a specific CDK4/6i may be influenced by adverse events (AEs). Recently, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) approved the possibility of switching between CDK4/6i for unacceptable toxicity. This study explores oncologists' experiences and future perspectives on CDK4/6 inhibitor switching following this new approval.
Methods
With the support of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), we conducted a survey among 92 oncologists to assess the impact of AIFA's approval on patient management.
Results
The survey showed that 48 % of participants were not surprised regarding AIFA's decision, with 76 % of respondents believing that this opportunity would significantly influence their treatment choices, enhancing AEs management for patients. Yet, 49 % of respondents emphasized the need for more real world evidence on CDK4/6i switch safety and efficacy. 96 % of respondents reported discontinuation rates between 0% and 25 % of patients, with constipation and hematological toxicity being the most frequent treatment discontinuation reasons. The oncologists prescribing CDK4/6i switch reported that most of these patients were in first line treatment (85 %) and the most common second CDK4/6i most frequently initiated was palbociclib (69 %), then abemaciclib (17 %) and ribociclib (14 %). Among those who started the second CDK4/6i at full dosage, 66 % of patients didn't require a dose reduction.
Conclusion
Our survey highlights the importance of allowing CDK4/6i switching, thus likely prompting oncologists to adapt their treatment choices, leading to better AEs management for improving patients’ outcome.
期刊介绍:
The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.