{"title":"下颌磨牙骨折拔除后修复应力的有限元分析。","authors":"Salih Düzgün, Emir Esim, Tuğrul Aslan, Ayşe Tuğba Eminsoy Avcı","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05464-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed stress distributions in simulated mandibular molars filled with various materials after the removal of fractured instruments from the apical thirds of the root canals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finite element models of the mesial and distal root canals were created, where fractured instruments were assumed to be removed using a staging platform established with a modified Gates-Glidden bur (Woodpecker, Guangxi, P.R. China). Each canal was treated with different materials: Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fosses, France), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and gutta-percha. In addition to these, four control models were also created. In total, 14 models were generated and subjected to a 300 N force applied at a 45° angle to simulate the stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model 1 (Biodentine) and 2 (Gutta-percha + Biodentine) showed the lowest stresses among mesial root canal models, whereas Model 5 (Gutta-percha) showed the highest. Among distal root canal models, Model 6 (Biodentine) and 7 (Gutta-percha + Biodentine) showed the lowest stresses, while Model 10 (Gutta-percha) showed the highest. In addition, Biodentine (Septodont) and Gutta-percha + Biodentine (Septodont) produced similar stress levels in both mesial and distal roots, while MTA and Gutta-percha + MTA led to increased stresses, especially in the distal root. Among the control models, the highest maximum von Mises stress values were in Model 13 and Model 14, which had a staging platform and were not filled with any root canal filling material, after the broken instrument was removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biodentine (Septodont) may be preferable to MTA for filling staging platform cavities post-fractured instrument removal due to lower stress levels. Furthermore, calcium silicate-based materials alone or in combination with Gutta-percha showed similar stress levels, suggesting their potential use for root canal filling. All models demonstrated structural integrity within safe limits.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element analysis of stress in mandibular molars repaired after fractured instrument removal.\",\"authors\":\"Salih Düzgün, Emir Esim, Tuğrul Aslan, Ayşe Tuğba Eminsoy Avcı\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-05464-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed stress distributions in simulated mandibular molars filled with various materials after the removal of fractured instruments from the apical thirds of the root canals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finite element models of the mesial and distal root canals were created, where fractured instruments were assumed to be removed using a staging platform established with a modified Gates-Glidden bur (Woodpecker, Guangxi, P.R. China). Each canal was treated with different materials: Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fosses, France), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and gutta-percha. In addition to these, four control models were also created. In total, 14 models were generated and subjected to a 300 N force applied at a 45° angle to simulate the stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model 1 (Biodentine) and 2 (Gutta-percha + Biodentine) showed the lowest stresses among mesial root canal models, whereas Model 5 (Gutta-percha) showed the highest. Among distal root canal models, Model 6 (Biodentine) and 7 (Gutta-percha + Biodentine) showed the lowest stresses, while Model 10 (Gutta-percha) showed the highest. In addition, Biodentine (Septodont) and Gutta-percha + Biodentine (Septodont) produced similar stress levels in both mesial and distal roots, while MTA and Gutta-percha + MTA led to increased stresses, especially in the distal root. Among the control models, the highest maximum von Mises stress values were in Model 13 and Model 14, which had a staging platform and were not filled with any root canal filling material, after the broken instrument was removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biodentine (Septodont) may be preferable to MTA for filling staging platform cavities post-fractured instrument removal due to lower stress levels. Furthermore, calcium silicate-based materials alone or in combination with Gutta-percha showed similar stress levels, suggesting their potential use for root canal filling. All models demonstrated structural integrity within safe limits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05464-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05464-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究评估了从根管顶端移除断裂器械后不同材料充填的模拟下颌磨牙的应力分布。方法:建立近中根管和远端根管的有限元模型,其中假设使用改良的Gates-Glidden bur (Woodpecker,广西,P.R.中国)建立的分阶段平台移除断裂的器械。每条管道都用不同的材料处理:Biodentine (septodon, Saint mauro -des- foss, France), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)和gutta-percha。除此之外,还创建了四个控制模型。总共生成了14个模型,并在45°角处施加300牛的力来模拟应力。结果:模型1(百腾碱)和2(杜仲胶+百腾碱)的应力在近中根管模型中最低,而模型5(杜仲胶)的应力最高。在远端根管模型中,模型6(百腾碱)和7(杜仲胶+百腾碱)的应力最小,模型10(杜仲胶)的应力最大。此外,百登亭(septodon)和杜仲胶+百登亭(septodon)在近根和远根中产生相似的应力水平,而MTA和杜仲胶+ MTA导致应力增加,尤其是在远根中。在对照组模型中,模型13和模型14的von Mises应力值最大,模型13和模型14具有分期平台,并且没有填充任何根管填充物。结论:由于应力水平较低,Biodentine (septodon)可能比MTA更适合用于填充骨折器械移除后的分期平台腔。此外,硅酸钙材料单独使用或与古塔-柏胶联合使用均显示出相似的应力水平,这表明它们在根管充填方面具有潜在的应用前景。所有模型的结构完整性都在安全范围内。
Finite element analysis of stress in mandibular molars repaired after fractured instrument removal.
Background: This study assessed stress distributions in simulated mandibular molars filled with various materials after the removal of fractured instruments from the apical thirds of the root canals.
Methods: Finite element models of the mesial and distal root canals were created, where fractured instruments were assumed to be removed using a staging platform established with a modified Gates-Glidden bur (Woodpecker, Guangxi, P.R. China). Each canal was treated with different materials: Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fosses, France), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and gutta-percha. In addition to these, four control models were also created. In total, 14 models were generated and subjected to a 300 N force applied at a 45° angle to simulate the stress.
Results: Model 1 (Biodentine) and 2 (Gutta-percha + Biodentine) showed the lowest stresses among mesial root canal models, whereas Model 5 (Gutta-percha) showed the highest. Among distal root canal models, Model 6 (Biodentine) and 7 (Gutta-percha + Biodentine) showed the lowest stresses, while Model 10 (Gutta-percha) showed the highest. In addition, Biodentine (Septodont) and Gutta-percha + Biodentine (Septodont) produced similar stress levels in both mesial and distal roots, while MTA and Gutta-percha + MTA led to increased stresses, especially in the distal root. Among the control models, the highest maximum von Mises stress values were in Model 13 and Model 14, which had a staging platform and were not filled with any root canal filling material, after the broken instrument was removed.
Conclusions: Biodentine (Septodont) may be preferable to MTA for filling staging platform cavities post-fractured instrument removal due to lower stress levels. Furthermore, calcium silicate-based materials alone or in combination with Gutta-percha showed similar stress levels, suggesting their potential use for root canal filling. All models demonstrated structural integrity within safe limits.
期刊介绍:
BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.