“如果一个不发生,另一个会发生”:法医心理健康服务患者同时发生自残和攻击的经历。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.834
Matina Shafti, Peter Taylor, Andrew Forrester, Louise Robinson, Sandeep Mathews, Daniel Pratt
{"title":"“如果一个不发生,另一个会发生”:法医心理健康服务患者同时发生自残和攻击的经历。","authors":"Matina Shafti, Peter Taylor, Andrew Forrester, Louise Robinson, Sandeep Mathews, Daniel Pratt","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-occurring self-harm and aggression (dual harm) is particularly prevalent among forensic mental health service (FMHS) patients. There is limited understanding of why this population engages in dual harm.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This work aims to explore FMHS patients' experiences of dual harm and how they make sense of this behaviour, with a focus on the role of emotions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were identified from their participation in a previous study. Sixteen FMHS patients with a lifetime history of dual harm were recruited from two hospitals. Individuals participated in one-to-one, semi-structured interviews where they reflected on past and/or current self-harm and aggression. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes were generated: self-harm and aggression as emotional regulation strategies, the consequences of witnessing harmful behaviours, relationships with others and the self, trapped within the criminal justice system, the convergence and divergence of self-harm and aggression, and moving forward as an FMHS patient. Themes highlighted shared risk factors of dual harm across participants, including emotional dysregulation, perceived lack of social support and witnessing harmful behaviours. Participants underlined the duality of their self-harm and aggression, primarily utilising both to regulate negative emotions. These behaviours also fulfilled distinct purposes at times (e.g. self-harm as punishment, aggression as defence). The impact of contextual factors within FMHSs, including restrictive practices and institutionalisation, were emphasised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide recommendations that can help address dual harm within forensic settings, including (a) transdiagnostic, individualised approaches that consider the duality of self-harm and aggression; and (b) cultural and organisational focus on recovery-centred practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"e20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'If one doesn't happen, the other will': forensic mental health service patients' experiences of co-occurring self-harm and aggression.\",\"authors\":\"Matina Shafti, Peter Taylor, Andrew Forrester, Louise Robinson, Sandeep Mathews, Daniel Pratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2024.834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-occurring self-harm and aggression (dual harm) is particularly prevalent among forensic mental health service (FMHS) patients. There is limited understanding of why this population engages in dual harm.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This work aims to explore FMHS patients' experiences of dual harm and how they make sense of this behaviour, with a focus on the role of emotions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were identified from their participation in a previous study. Sixteen FMHS patients with a lifetime history of dual harm were recruited from two hospitals. Individuals participated in one-to-one, semi-structured interviews where they reflected on past and/or current self-harm and aggression. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes were generated: self-harm and aggression as emotional regulation strategies, the consequences of witnessing harmful behaviours, relationships with others and the self, trapped within the criminal justice system, the convergence and divergence of self-harm and aggression, and moving forward as an FMHS patient. Themes highlighted shared risk factors of dual harm across participants, including emotional dysregulation, perceived lack of social support and witnessing harmful behaviours. Participants underlined the duality of their self-harm and aggression, primarily utilising both to regulate negative emotions. These behaviours also fulfilled distinct purposes at times (e.g. self-harm as punishment, aggression as defence). The impact of contextual factors within FMHSs, including restrictive practices and institutionalisation, were emphasised.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide recommendations that can help address dual harm within forensic settings, including (a) transdiagnostic, individualised approaches that consider the duality of self-harm and aggression; and (b) cultural and organisational focus on recovery-centred practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"e20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.834\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.834","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在法医精神卫生服务(FMHS)患者中,同时发生的自我伤害和攻击(双重伤害)尤为普遍。人们对这一群体为何会受到双重伤害的理解有限。目的:本研究旨在探索FMHS患者的双重伤害经历,以及他们如何理解这种行为,重点关注情绪的作用。方法:参与者从之前的研究中被识别出来。从两家医院招募了16例终生有双重伤害史的FMHS患者。个人参加一对一的半结构化访谈,在那里他们反思过去和/或现在的自我伤害和攻击行为。访谈记录使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:产生了六个主题:自我伤害和攻击作为情绪调节策略,目睹有害行为的后果,与他人和自我的关系,陷入刑事司法系统,自我伤害和攻击的趋同和分歧,以及作为FMHS患者的前进。主题强调了参与者共同的双重伤害风险因素,包括情绪失调、感知到缺乏社会支持和目睹有害行为。参与者强调了他们的自我伤害和攻击性的两重性,主要利用两者来调节负面情绪。这些行为有时也会实现不同的目的(例如,自残作为惩罚,攻击作为防御)。强调了家庭保健服务内部环境因素的影响,包括限制性做法和制度化。结论:研究结果提供了有助于解决法医环境中的双重伤害的建议,包括:(a)考虑自我伤害和攻击的二元性的跨诊断、个性化方法;(b)注重以康复为中心的实践的文化和组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'If one doesn't happen, the other will': forensic mental health service patients' experiences of co-occurring self-harm and aggression.

Background: Co-occurring self-harm and aggression (dual harm) is particularly prevalent among forensic mental health service (FMHS) patients. There is limited understanding of why this population engages in dual harm.

Aims: This work aims to explore FMHS patients' experiences of dual harm and how they make sense of this behaviour, with a focus on the role of emotions.

Method: Participants were identified from their participation in a previous study. Sixteen FMHS patients with a lifetime history of dual harm were recruited from two hospitals. Individuals participated in one-to-one, semi-structured interviews where they reflected on past and/or current self-harm and aggression. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Six themes were generated: self-harm and aggression as emotional regulation strategies, the consequences of witnessing harmful behaviours, relationships with others and the self, trapped within the criminal justice system, the convergence and divergence of self-harm and aggression, and moving forward as an FMHS patient. Themes highlighted shared risk factors of dual harm across participants, including emotional dysregulation, perceived lack of social support and witnessing harmful behaviours. Participants underlined the duality of their self-harm and aggression, primarily utilising both to regulate negative emotions. These behaviours also fulfilled distinct purposes at times (e.g. self-harm as punishment, aggression as defence). The impact of contextual factors within FMHSs, including restrictive practices and institutionalisation, were emphasised.

Conclusions: Findings provide recommendations that can help address dual harm within forensic settings, including (a) transdiagnostic, individualised approaches that consider the duality of self-harm and aggression; and (b) cultural and organisational focus on recovery-centred practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信