益生元景观:历史,健康和生理效益,以及监管挑战-国际生物学会视角第1部分。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
S H Saville, J A Younes, G Paraskevakos, K Venema
{"title":"益生元景观:历史,健康和生理效益,以及监管挑战-国际生物学会视角第1部分。","authors":"S H Saville, J A Younes, G Paraskevakos, K Venema","doi":"10.1163/18762891-bja00056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prebiotics are becoming increasingly recognized by consumers, health care professionals and regulators as important contributors to health. Nonetheless, the development, progress, and adoption of prebiotics is hindered by loose terminology, various misconceptions about sources and types of compounds that may be classified as prebiotics, and the lack of consensus on a definition that satisfies regulators. Evolving knowledge of the microbiome and its effects on host health has generated opportunities for modulation of the microbiota that can support host health. Various types of biotics - probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics, are compounds that either modulate the microbiota or arise from the microbiota, affecting health locally and distally. Each of these classes of biotic compounds have distinct, yet complementary benefits. While many scientists have proposed definitions for prebiotics, and there have been attempts by selected scientists to develop a 'consensus definition', the fact remains that globally, scientists, manufacturers, and marketers have adopted different definitions to suit their own interests and purposes, leading to confusion among consumers and health care professionals. The pathway to regulatory acceptance and to reduce/eliminate confusion is a definition that puts the focus on the consumer, and the benefits that consumers can realise from consumption of prebiotics. This consumer-focused approach, supported by science, will also align with regulators and support broader regulatory approval of prebiotics as a category. In this review, we discuss the history of prebiotics, and introduce criteria and a decision tree to classify compounds as prebiotics, supported by the scientific literature to date. This includes a summary of compounds that have been clearly recognised as prebiotics. We also review the microbiota, microbiome, and the various ways in which prebiotics can beneficially affect the microbiota and health. The safety and efficacy of prebiotics is also reviewed, along with effective doses and limitations associated with prebiotic use. This includes scientific tools and methods that help to establish the function, safe use and efficacy of a prebiotic. We also identify misconceptions that can be addressed in communications to consumers and health care professionals. Manufacturing guidelines and the current regulatory status of prebiotics in various jurisdictions are also reviewed. Collectively, this review provides an in-depth overview of the role for prebiotics to support the health of consumers. This consumer-focused approach provides clear criteria for the product category, safe use, effective communication of health benefits and limitations, and a pathway towards regulatory approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":8834,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial microbes","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prebiotic landscape: history, health and physiological benefits, and regulatory challenges - an IPA perspective part 1.\",\"authors\":\"S H Saville, J A Younes, G Paraskevakos, K Venema\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18762891-bja00056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prebiotics are becoming increasingly recognized by consumers, health care professionals and regulators as important contributors to health. Nonetheless, the development, progress, and adoption of prebiotics is hindered by loose terminology, various misconceptions about sources and types of compounds that may be classified as prebiotics, and the lack of consensus on a definition that satisfies regulators. Evolving knowledge of the microbiome and its effects on host health has generated opportunities for modulation of the microbiota that can support host health. Various types of biotics - probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics, are compounds that either modulate the microbiota or arise from the microbiota, affecting health locally and distally. Each of these classes of biotic compounds have distinct, yet complementary benefits. While many scientists have proposed definitions for prebiotics, and there have been attempts by selected scientists to develop a 'consensus definition', the fact remains that globally, scientists, manufacturers, and marketers have adopted different definitions to suit their own interests and purposes, leading to confusion among consumers and health care professionals. The pathway to regulatory acceptance and to reduce/eliminate confusion is a definition that puts the focus on the consumer, and the benefits that consumers can realise from consumption of prebiotics. This consumer-focused approach, supported by science, will also align with regulators and support broader regulatory approval of prebiotics as a category. In this review, we discuss the history of prebiotics, and introduce criteria and a decision tree to classify compounds as prebiotics, supported by the scientific literature to date. This includes a summary of compounds that have been clearly recognised as prebiotics. We also review the microbiota, microbiome, and the various ways in which prebiotics can beneficially affect the microbiota and health. The safety and efficacy of prebiotics is also reviewed, along with effective doses and limitations associated with prebiotic use. This includes scientific tools and methods that help to establish the function, safe use and efficacy of a prebiotic. We also identify misconceptions that can be addressed in communications to consumers and health care professionals. Manufacturing guidelines and the current regulatory status of prebiotics in various jurisdictions are also reviewed. Collectively, this review provides an in-depth overview of the role for prebiotics to support the health of consumers. This consumer-focused approach provides clear criteria for the product category, safe use, effective communication of health benefits and limitations, and a pathway towards regulatory approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"1-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

益生元越来越被消费者、卫生保健专业人员和监管机构认识到是健康的重要贡献者。然而,益生元的发展、进步和采用受到术语松散、对可能被归类为益生元的化合物的来源和类型的各种误解以及对满足监管机构的定义缺乏共识的阻碍。对微生物群及其对宿主健康影响的不断发展的认识为调节能够支持宿主健康的微生物群提供了机会。各种类型的益生菌——益生菌、益生元和后益生菌,是调节微生物群或由微生物群产生的化合物,影响局部和远处的健康。每一类生物化合物都有不同的,但互补的好处。虽然许多科学家提出了益生元的定义,也有一些选定的科学家试图形成一个“共识定义”,但事实仍然是,在全球范围内,科学家、制造商和营销人员采用了不同的定义来适应自己的利益和目的,导致消费者和卫生保健专业人员之间的混淆。监管机构接受和减少/消除混淆的途径是一个将重点放在消费者身上的定义,以及消费者可以从食用益生元中获得的好处。这种以消费者为中心的方法,在科学的支持下,也将与监管机构保持一致,并支持将益生元作为一个类别进行更广泛的监管批准。在本文中,我们讨论了益生元的历史,并介绍了迄今为止的科学文献支持的益生元化合物分类标准和决策树。这包括已被明确认定为益生元的化合物的摘要。我们还回顾了微生物群,微生物群,以及益生元对微生物群和健康有益的各种方式。本文还综述了益生元的安全性和有效性,以及与益生元使用相关的有效剂量和限制。这包括有助于确定益生元的功能、安全使用和功效的科学工具和方法。我们还确定了可以在与消费者和卫生保健专业人员的沟通中解决的误解。本文还对益生元的生产指南和目前在各个司法管辖区的监管状况进行了综述。总的来说,这篇综述对益生元在支持消费者健康方面的作用进行了深入的概述。这种以消费者为中心的方法为产品类别、安全使用、有效宣传健康益处和局限性以及获得监管部门批准的途径提供了明确的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The prebiotic landscape: history, health and physiological benefits, and regulatory challenges - an IPA perspective part 1.

Prebiotics are becoming increasingly recognized by consumers, health care professionals and regulators as important contributors to health. Nonetheless, the development, progress, and adoption of prebiotics is hindered by loose terminology, various misconceptions about sources and types of compounds that may be classified as prebiotics, and the lack of consensus on a definition that satisfies regulators. Evolving knowledge of the microbiome and its effects on host health has generated opportunities for modulation of the microbiota that can support host health. Various types of biotics - probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics, are compounds that either modulate the microbiota or arise from the microbiota, affecting health locally and distally. Each of these classes of biotic compounds have distinct, yet complementary benefits. While many scientists have proposed definitions for prebiotics, and there have been attempts by selected scientists to develop a 'consensus definition', the fact remains that globally, scientists, manufacturers, and marketers have adopted different definitions to suit their own interests and purposes, leading to confusion among consumers and health care professionals. The pathway to regulatory acceptance and to reduce/eliminate confusion is a definition that puts the focus on the consumer, and the benefits that consumers can realise from consumption of prebiotics. This consumer-focused approach, supported by science, will also align with regulators and support broader regulatory approval of prebiotics as a category. In this review, we discuss the history of prebiotics, and introduce criteria and a decision tree to classify compounds as prebiotics, supported by the scientific literature to date. This includes a summary of compounds that have been clearly recognised as prebiotics. We also review the microbiota, microbiome, and the various ways in which prebiotics can beneficially affect the microbiota and health. The safety and efficacy of prebiotics is also reviewed, along with effective doses and limitations associated with prebiotic use. This includes scientific tools and methods that help to establish the function, safe use and efficacy of a prebiotic. We also identify misconceptions that can be addressed in communications to consumers and health care professionals. Manufacturing guidelines and the current regulatory status of prebiotics in various jurisdictions are also reviewed. Collectively, this review provides an in-depth overview of the role for prebiotics to support the health of consumers. This consumer-focused approach provides clear criteria for the product category, safe use, effective communication of health benefits and limitations, and a pathway towards regulatory approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Beneficial microbes
Beneficial microbes MICROBIOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Beneficial Microbes is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of microbes beneficial to the health and wellbeing of man and animal. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with beneficial microbes in both the small and large intestine, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming beneficial microbes-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including safety aspects of pro- & prebiotics, regulatory aspects, mechanisms of action, health benefits for the host, optimal production processes, screening methods, (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, host and bacterial physiology, application, and role in health and disease in man and animal. Beneficial Microbes is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as those of policy makers and regulators. The journal will have five major sections: * Food, nutrition and health * Animal nutrition * Processing and application * Regulatory & safety aspects * Medical & health applications In these sections, topics dealt with by Beneficial Microbes include: * Worldwide safety and regulatory issues * Human and animal nutrition and health effects * Latest discoveries in mechanistic studies and screening methods to unravel mode of action * Host physiology related to allergy, inflammation, obesity, etc. * Trends in application of (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics * New developments in how processing optimizes pro- & prebiotics for application * Bacterial physiology related to health benefits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信