{"title":"门牙间距离作为男性和女性插管困难预测因素的比较——一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"A Kireeti, Nirmala Jonnavithula, Tappa Rabbani","doi":"10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the studies on difficult intubation and laryngoscopy focused on American and European populations. However, Indians have distinct anthropometric characteristics compared to these populations. This study aims to determine the gender difference in inter-incisor distance (IID) cut-off marks to assess the ease of intubation in the Indian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on 516 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative assessments included IID, thyromental distance, neck circumference, sternomental distance (SMD), thyrohyoid distance, mentohyoid distance, and modified mallampatti grading. Intubation difficulty scores (IDSs) were assessed during intubation. The optimal cut-off values of inter incisor gap and difficult intubation were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort was grouped into males (Group 1 [n = 258]) and females (Group 2 [n = 258]). Males had a significantly higher mean age (P = 0.04) and weight (P = 0.00) than females. Difficult intubation incidence was 16.3% of males and 6.2% of females. Increased IID (P = 0.039), decreased SMD (P = 0.046), and males (P = 0.002) are identified as predictors of difficult intubation.IID and IDS showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with significant cut-off values of 4.25 and 1.50, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cut-off value of IID did not show a significant difference in gender variation. Despite the low IID in females, intubation difficulties were not observed compared to males.</p>","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Inter-Incisor Distance as a Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Men and Women-A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"A Kireeti, Nirmala Jonnavithula, Tappa Rabbani\",\"doi\":\"10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the studies on difficult intubation and laryngoscopy focused on American and European populations. However, Indians have distinct anthropometric characteristics compared to these populations. This study aims to determine the gender difference in inter-incisor distance (IID) cut-off marks to assess the ease of intubation in the Indian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on 516 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative assessments included IID, thyromental distance, neck circumference, sternomental distance (SMD), thyrohyoid distance, mentohyoid distance, and modified mallampatti grading. Intubation difficulty scores (IDSs) were assessed during intubation. The optimal cut-off values of inter incisor gap and difficult intubation were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort was grouped into males (Group 1 [n = 258]) and females (Group 2 [n = 258]). Males had a significantly higher mean age (P = 0.04) and weight (P = 0.00) than females. Difficult intubation incidence was 16.3% of males and 6.2% of females. Increased IID (P = 0.039), decreased SMD (P = 0.046), and males (P = 0.002) are identified as predictors of difficult intubation.IID and IDS showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with significant cut-off values of 4.25 and 1.50, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cut-off value of IID did not show a significant difference in gender variation. Despite the low IID in females, intubation difficulties were not observed compared to males.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Inter-Incisor Distance as a Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Men and Women-A Prospective Observational Study.
Background: Most of the studies on difficult intubation and laryngoscopy focused on American and European populations. However, Indians have distinct anthropometric characteristics compared to these populations. This study aims to determine the gender difference in inter-incisor distance (IID) cut-off marks to assess the ease of intubation in the Indian population.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 516 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative assessments included IID, thyromental distance, neck circumference, sternomental distance (SMD), thyrohyoid distance, mentohyoid distance, and modified mallampatti grading. Intubation difficulty scores (IDSs) were assessed during intubation. The optimal cut-off values of inter incisor gap and difficult intubation were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results: The total cohort was grouped into males (Group 1 [n = 258]) and females (Group 2 [n = 258]). Males had a significantly higher mean age (P = 0.04) and weight (P = 0.00) than females. Difficult intubation incidence was 16.3% of males and 6.2% of females. Increased IID (P = 0.039), decreased SMD (P = 0.046), and males (P = 0.002) are identified as predictors of difficult intubation.IID and IDS showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with significant cut-off values of 4.25 and 1.50, respectively.
Conclusion: The cut-off value of IID did not show a significant difference in gender variation. Despite the low IID in females, intubation difficulties were not observed compared to males.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.