门牙间距离作为男性和女性插管困难预测因素的比较——一项前瞻性观察研究。

Q3 Medicine
A Kireeti, Nirmala Jonnavithula, Tappa Rabbani
{"title":"门牙间距离作为男性和女性插管困难预测因素的比较——一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"A Kireeti, Nirmala Jonnavithula, Tappa Rabbani","doi":"10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the studies on difficult intubation and laryngoscopy focused on American and European populations. However, Indians have distinct anthropometric characteristics compared to these populations. This study aims to determine the gender difference in inter-incisor distance (IID) cut-off marks to assess the ease of intubation in the Indian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on 516 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative assessments included IID, thyromental distance, neck circumference, sternomental distance (SMD), thyrohyoid distance, mentohyoid distance, and modified mallampatti grading. Intubation difficulty scores (IDSs) were assessed during intubation. The optimal cut-off values of inter incisor gap and difficult intubation were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort was grouped into males (Group 1 [n = 258]) and females (Group 2 [n = 258]). Males had a significantly higher mean age (P = 0.04) and weight (P = 0.00) than females. Difficult intubation incidence was 16.3% of males and 6.2% of females. Increased IID (P = 0.039), decreased SMD (P = 0.046), and males (P = 0.002) are identified as predictors of difficult intubation.IID and IDS showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with significant cut-off values of 4.25 and 1.50, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cut-off value of IID did not show a significant difference in gender variation. Despite the low IID in females, intubation difficulties were not observed compared to males.</p>","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Inter-Incisor Distance as a Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Men and Women-A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"A Kireeti, Nirmala Jonnavithula, Tappa Rabbani\",\"doi\":\"10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the studies on difficult intubation and laryngoscopy focused on American and European populations. However, Indians have distinct anthropometric characteristics compared to these populations. This study aims to determine the gender difference in inter-incisor distance (IID) cut-off marks to assess the ease of intubation in the Indian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted on 516 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative assessments included IID, thyromental distance, neck circumference, sternomental distance (SMD), thyrohyoid distance, mentohyoid distance, and modified mallampatti grading. Intubation difficulty scores (IDSs) were assessed during intubation. The optimal cut-off values of inter incisor gap and difficult intubation were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort was grouped into males (Group 1 [n = 258]) and females (Group 2 [n = 258]). Males had a significantly higher mean age (P = 0.04) and weight (P = 0.00) than females. Difficult intubation incidence was 16.3% of males and 6.2% of females. Increased IID (P = 0.039), decreased SMD (P = 0.046), and males (P = 0.002) are identified as predictors of difficult intubation.IID and IDS showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with significant cut-off values of 4.25 and 1.50, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cut-off value of IID did not show a significant difference in gender variation. Despite the low IID in females, intubation difficulties were not observed compared to males.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202501/PP.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数关于困难插管和喉镜检查的研究集中在美国和欧洲人群。然而,与这些人口相比,印度人有明显的人体特征。本研究旨在确定性别差异在切牙间距离(IID)截止点评估插管的便利性在印度人口。方法:对516例全麻气管插管择期手术患者进行前瞻性观察研究。术前评估包括IID、甲状腺距离、颈围、胸骨距离(SMD)、甲状腺舌骨距离、颏舌骨距离和改良mallampatti分级。插管时评估插管困难评分(IDSs)。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析切齿间隙和插管困难的最佳临界值。结果:整个队列分为男性(第一组[n = 258])和女性(第二组[n = 258])。男性的平均年龄(P = 0.04)和体重(P = 0.00)显著高于女性。插管困难发生率男性为16.3%,女性为6.2%。IID升高(P = 0.039)、SMD降低(P = 0.046)和男性(P = 0.002)被认为是插管困难的预测因素。IID和IDS的特异性大于敏感性,其临界值分别为4.25和1.50。结论:IID的截止值在性别差异上无显著性差异。尽管女性的IID较低,但与男性相比,没有观察到插管困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Inter-Incisor Distance as a Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Men and Women-A Prospective Observational Study.

Background: Most of the studies on difficult intubation and laryngoscopy focused on American and European populations. However, Indians have distinct anthropometric characteristics compared to these populations. This study aims to determine the gender difference in inter-incisor distance (IID) cut-off marks to assess the ease of intubation in the Indian population.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 516 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Preoperative assessments included IID, thyromental distance, neck circumference, sternomental distance (SMD), thyrohyoid distance, mentohyoid distance, and modified mallampatti grading. Intubation difficulty scores (IDSs) were assessed during intubation. The optimal cut-off values of inter incisor gap and difficult intubation were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The total cohort was grouped into males (Group 1 [n = 258]) and females (Group 2 [n = 258]). Males had a significantly higher mean age (P = 0.04) and weight (P = 0.00) than females. Difficult intubation incidence was 16.3% of males and 6.2% of females. Increased IID (P = 0.039), decreased SMD (P = 0.046), and males (P = 0.002) are identified as predictors of difficult intubation.IID and IDS showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with significant cut-off values of 4.25 and 1.50, respectively.

Conclusion: The cut-off value of IID did not show a significant difference in gender variation. Despite the low IID in females, intubation difficulties were not observed compared to males.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信