手持式超声联合3D打印技术辅助切开复位内固定治疗多发性肋骨骨折的疗效分析。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jieshi Li, Qianshun Chen, Xunyu Xu, Yimeng Zhuo, Minhui Zhang, Dong Zhou, Zhong Li
{"title":"手持式超声联合3D打印技术辅助切开复位内固定治疗多发性肋骨骨折的疗效分析。","authors":"Jieshi Li, Qianshun Chen, Xunyu Xu, Yimeng Zhuo, Minhui Zhang, Dong Zhou, Zhong Li","doi":"10.62713/aic.3612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation assisted by handheld ultrasound combined with three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in treating multiple rib fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 84 patients affected with multiple rib fractures admitted to our hospital between August 2022 and April 2024. After excluding four cases, 80 cases were included in this study. Based on the method of preoperative rib fracture localization, patients were divided into three groups: group A (n = 30), group B (n = 26), and group C (n = 24). Group A received 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest Computed Tomography (CT), group B adopted the examination of handheld ultrasound and 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest CT, and group C received handheld ultrasound, 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest CT, and 3D printing technology. The operation-related indicators (such as incision length, exposure time of surgical field, intraoperative blood loss), pulmonary function [total lung capacity (TLC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), residual volume (RV)], quality of life, degree of pain, and incidence of complications were compared among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before surgery, there were no significant differences in pulmonary function, quality of life, and degree of pain among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, after surgery, significant differences in the pairwise comparison of TLC, FVC, FEV1/FVC and RV were observed among the three groups (p < 0.001), with group C indicating the highest levels of observational indicators and group A exhibiting the lowest levels. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in the pairwise comparison of incision length, exposure time of surgical field, and intraoperative blood loss among the three groups (p < 0.001). Group C had the shortest incision length, the lowest exposure time in the surgical field, and the least intraoperative blood loss, while those in group A were the opposite. After surgery, a significant difference was found in the pairwise comparison of the quality of life and degree of pain among the three groups (p < 0.001). Group C had the highest quality of life and the lowest degree of pain, while Group A had the opposite results. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The open reduction and internal fixation assisted by handheld ultrasound combined with 3D printing technology revealed effective curative outcomes in treating multiple rib fractures. This method promotes the formulation of an accurate and personalized surgical plan and seems to have high clinical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 1","pages":"98-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Assisted by Handheld Ultrasound Combined with 3D Printing Technology in Treating Multiple Rib Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Jieshi Li, Qianshun Chen, Xunyu Xu, Yimeng Zhuo, Minhui Zhang, Dong Zhou, Zhong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation assisted by handheld ultrasound combined with three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in treating multiple rib fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 84 patients affected with multiple rib fractures admitted to our hospital between August 2022 and April 2024. After excluding four cases, 80 cases were included in this study. Based on the method of preoperative rib fracture localization, patients were divided into three groups: group A (n = 30), group B (n = 26), and group C (n = 24). Group A received 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest Computed Tomography (CT), group B adopted the examination of handheld ultrasound and 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest CT, and group C received handheld ultrasound, 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest CT, and 3D printing technology. The operation-related indicators (such as incision length, exposure time of surgical field, intraoperative blood loss), pulmonary function [total lung capacity (TLC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), residual volume (RV)], quality of life, degree of pain, and incidence of complications were compared among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before surgery, there were no significant differences in pulmonary function, quality of life, and degree of pain among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, after surgery, significant differences in the pairwise comparison of TLC, FVC, FEV1/FVC and RV were observed among the three groups (p < 0.001), with group C indicating the highest levels of observational indicators and group A exhibiting the lowest levels. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in the pairwise comparison of incision length, exposure time of surgical field, and intraoperative blood loss among the three groups (p < 0.001). Group C had the shortest incision length, the lowest exposure time in the surgical field, and the least intraoperative blood loss, while those in group A were the opposite. After surgery, a significant difference was found in the pairwise comparison of the quality of life and degree of pain among the three groups (p < 0.001). Group C had the highest quality of life and the lowest degree of pain, while Group A had the opposite results. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The open reduction and internal fixation assisted by handheld ultrasound combined with 3D printing technology revealed effective curative outcomes in treating multiple rib fractures. This method promotes the formulation of an accurate and personalized surgical plan and seems to have high clinical significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"98-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3612\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨手持式超声联合三维打印技术辅助切开复位内固定治疗多发性肋骨骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院2022年8月至2024年4月收治的84例多发性肋骨骨折患者的临床资料。排除4例后,本研究共纳入80例。根据术前肋骨骨折定位的方法,将患者分为A组(n = 30)、B组(n = 26)、C组(n = 24)。A组患者行胸部CT三维重建肋骨,B组患者行手持式超声检查及胸部CT三维重建肋骨,C组患者行手持式超声检查、胸部CT三维重建肋骨及3D打印技术。比较三组患者的手术相关指标(切口长度、手术野暴露时间、术中出血量等)、肺功能[总肺活量(TLC)、用力肺活量(FVC)、1秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)、残气量(RV)]、生活质量、疼痛程度、并发症发生率等。结果:术前,三组患者肺功能、生活质量、疼痛程度比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。但术后三组间TLC、FVC、FEV1/FVC、RV两两比较差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.001),观察指标C组最高,A组最低。两组间切口长度、手术野暴露时间、术中出血量两两比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。C组切口长度最短,术中暴露时间最短,术中出血量最少,而A组则相反。术后三组患者生活质量和疼痛程度两两比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。C组患者的生活质量最高,疼痛程度最低,而A组患者的结果相反。三组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:手持式超声联合3D打印技术辅助切开复位内固定治疗多发性肋骨骨折疗效显著。该方法有助于制定准确、个性化的手术方案,具有较高的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Assisted by Handheld Ultrasound Combined with 3D Printing Technology in Treating Multiple Rib Fractures.

Aim: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation assisted by handheld ultrasound combined with three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in treating multiple rib fractures.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 84 patients affected with multiple rib fractures admitted to our hospital between August 2022 and April 2024. After excluding four cases, 80 cases were included in this study. Based on the method of preoperative rib fracture localization, patients were divided into three groups: group A (n = 30), group B (n = 26), and group C (n = 24). Group A received 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest Computed Tomography (CT), group B adopted the examination of handheld ultrasound and 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest CT, and group C received handheld ultrasound, 3D reconstruction of ribs on chest CT, and 3D printing technology. The operation-related indicators (such as incision length, exposure time of surgical field, intraoperative blood loss), pulmonary function [total lung capacity (TLC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), residual volume (RV)], quality of life, degree of pain, and incidence of complications were compared among the three groups.

Results: Before surgery, there were no significant differences in pulmonary function, quality of life, and degree of pain among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, after surgery, significant differences in the pairwise comparison of TLC, FVC, FEV1/FVC and RV were observed among the three groups (p < 0.001), with group C indicating the highest levels of observational indicators and group A exhibiting the lowest levels. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in the pairwise comparison of incision length, exposure time of surgical field, and intraoperative blood loss among the three groups (p < 0.001). Group C had the shortest incision length, the lowest exposure time in the surgical field, and the least intraoperative blood loss, while those in group A were the opposite. After surgery, a significant difference was found in the pairwise comparison of the quality of life and degree of pain among the three groups (p < 0.001). Group C had the highest quality of life and the lowest degree of pain, while Group A had the opposite results. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The open reduction and internal fixation assisted by handheld ultrasound combined with 3D printing technology revealed effective curative outcomes in treating multiple rib fractures. This method promotes the formulation of an accurate and personalized surgical plan and seems to have high clinical significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信