骶骨塌陷后休息还是不休息?打破了旧时代的风俗。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Andrea Morciano, Giovanni Pecorella, Andrea Tinelli, Michele Carlo Schiavi, Giuseppe Marzo, Mauro Cervigni, Giovanni Scambia
{"title":"骶骨塌陷后休息还是不休息?打破了旧时代的风俗。","authors":"Andrea Morciano, Giovanni Pecorella, Andrea Tinelli, Michele Carlo Schiavi, Giuseppe Marzo, Mauro Cervigni, Giovanni Scambia","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07904-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the advent of the ERAS Program, recovery after urogynecological surgery is still a highly debated topic in clinical practice. The majority of gynecologic surgeons, in fact, continue to advise patients to home rest and to avoid lifting heavy objects after surgery. The aim of the present study was to verify the impact of a moderate-high physical activity and recovery after surgery on anatomical results after LSC, with a 2-year follow-up (FU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and one consecutive patients with pelvic prolapse were retrospectively selected from our database among women who underwent, from October 2019 to February 2022, a laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Three-six and 24 months follow-up were studied. At 3 months, patients completed the IPAQ-SF Questionnaire to assess physical activity. According to IPAQ-SF, patients were divided in two arms: Low and Moderate-High activity level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months follow-up, we obtained a high anatomic success rate in absences of statistical differences between populations, with a significative persistence of these results even at 6 and 24 months. No differences were found in terms of subjective success and vaginal mesh erosions at 3-6 months and 2-years follow-ups between patients despite differences in IPAQ-SF activity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data highlight the need for urogynecologists, especially after LSC, to invest heavily in patient education and to shift away from the outdated concept of home rest after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To rest or not to rest after sacral colpopexy? Dispelling an old custom in the ERAS time.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Morciano, Giovanni Pecorella, Andrea Tinelli, Michele Carlo Schiavi, Giuseppe Marzo, Mauro Cervigni, Giovanni Scambia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07904-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the advent of the ERAS Program, recovery after urogynecological surgery is still a highly debated topic in clinical practice. The majority of gynecologic surgeons, in fact, continue to advise patients to home rest and to avoid lifting heavy objects after surgery. The aim of the present study was to verify the impact of a moderate-high physical activity and recovery after surgery on anatomical results after LSC, with a 2-year follow-up (FU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and one consecutive patients with pelvic prolapse were retrospectively selected from our database among women who underwent, from October 2019 to February 2022, a laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Three-six and 24 months follow-up were studied. At 3 months, patients completed the IPAQ-SF Questionnaire to assess physical activity. According to IPAQ-SF, patients were divided in two arms: Low and Moderate-High activity level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months follow-up, we obtained a high anatomic success rate in absences of statistical differences between populations, with a significative persistence of these results even at 6 and 24 months. No differences were found in terms of subjective success and vaginal mesh erosions at 3-6 months and 2-years follow-ups between patients despite differences in IPAQ-SF activity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data highlight the need for urogynecologists, especially after LSC, to invest heavily in patient education and to shift away from the outdated concept of home rest after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07904-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07904-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管出现了ERAS计划,但泌尿妇科手术后的恢复在临床实践中仍然是一个备受争议的话题。事实上,大多数妇科医生会继续建议患者在家休息,并避免术后举起重物。本研究的目的是通过为期2年的随访(FU),验证中高强度的体育活动和术后恢复对LSC术后解剖结果的影响。方法:从我们的数据库中回顾性选择了201例骨盆脱垂患者,这些患者于2019年10月至2022年2月期间接受了腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术。随访3 - 6个月和24个月。3个月时,患者完成IPAQ-SF问卷以评估身体活动。根据IPAQ-SF,患者分为两组:低活动量组和中高活动量组。结果:在3个月的随访中,我们获得了很高的解剖成功率,在人群之间没有统计学差异,即使在6个月和24个月时,这些结果也具有显著的持久性。尽管IPAQ-SF活性水平存在差异,但在3-6个月和2年随访期间,患者的主观成功率和阴道网片糜烂没有差异。结论:我们的数据突出了泌尿妇科医生,特别是LSC后,需要在患者教育方面投入大量资金,并改变手术后在家休息的过时观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To rest or not to rest after sacral colpopexy? Dispelling an old custom in the ERAS time.

Purpose: Despite the advent of the ERAS Program, recovery after urogynecological surgery is still a highly debated topic in clinical practice. The majority of gynecologic surgeons, in fact, continue to advise patients to home rest and to avoid lifting heavy objects after surgery. The aim of the present study was to verify the impact of a moderate-high physical activity and recovery after surgery on anatomical results after LSC, with a 2-year follow-up (FU).

Methods: Two hundred and one consecutive patients with pelvic prolapse were retrospectively selected from our database among women who underwent, from October 2019 to February 2022, a laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Three-six and 24 months follow-up were studied. At 3 months, patients completed the IPAQ-SF Questionnaire to assess physical activity. According to IPAQ-SF, patients were divided in two arms: Low and Moderate-High activity level.

Results: At 3 months follow-up, we obtained a high anatomic success rate in absences of statistical differences between populations, with a significative persistence of these results even at 6 and 24 months. No differences were found in terms of subjective success and vaginal mesh erosions at 3-6 months and 2-years follow-ups between patients despite differences in IPAQ-SF activity levels.

Conclusion: Our data highlight the need for urogynecologists, especially after LSC, to invest heavily in patient education and to shift away from the outdated concept of home rest after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信