深度学习衍生的慢性鼻窦炎定量评分评估:与生活质量结果的相关性。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Zhefan Shen, Ying Wei, Kexin Liu, Zhiqi Ma, Zhiliang Zhang, Xuechun Wang, Yong Li, Feng Shi, Zhongxiang Ding
{"title":"深度学习衍生的慢性鼻窦炎定量评分评估:与生活质量结果的相关性。","authors":"Zhefan Shen, Ying Wei, Kexin Liu, Zhiqi Ma, Zhiliang Zhang, Xuechun Wang, Yong Li, Feng Shi, Zhongxiang Ding","doi":"10.1177/19458924251313845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) plays a crucial role in assessing chronic rhinosinusitis, but lacks objective quantifiable indicators.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to use deep learning for automated sinus segmentation to generate distinct quantitative scores and explore their correlations with disease-specific quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2021 to August 2022, 445 CT data were collected from 2 medical centers. A deep learning model based on nnU-Net was trained for automatic sinus segmentation and internally validated using 300 cases. The remaining 145 cases were split into an external testing set (74 cases) and an independent testing set (71 cases). Two quantitative scores, the quantitative Lund-MacKay score and the quantitative opacification score (QOS), were derived from the segmentation results. The quantitative scores' efficacy was assessed by comparing them with the Lund-MacKay score (LMS), the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test score (SNOT-22), and other clinical variables through correlation analyses. Furthermore, the relationship between quantitative scores and postoperative quality of life improvement was explored using single-factor logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The segmentation model achieved average Dice similarity coefficients of 0.993, 0.978, 0.958, and 0.871 for the training, validation, external testing, and independent testing sets, respectively. Both quantitative scores significantly correlated with the LMS (<i>rho </i>= 0.87 and <i>rho </i>= 0.70, <i>P </i>< .001). Neither score correlated with the total SNOT-22 score, although the modified QOS showed significant correlations with the nasal and sleep subdomains (<i>rho </i>= 0.26 and <i>rho </i>= 0.27, <i>P </i><<i> </i>.05). No significant association was found between quantitative score and postoperative improvement in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning enables the automated segmentation of sinuses on CT scans, producing quantitative scores of sinus opacification. These automatic quantitative scores may serve as tools for chronic rhinosinusitis assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"19458924251313845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-Derived Quantitative Scores for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Assessment: Correlation With Quality of Life Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Zhefan Shen, Ying Wei, Kexin Liu, Zhiqi Ma, Zhiliang Zhang, Xuechun Wang, Yong Li, Feng Shi, Zhongxiang Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924251313845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) plays a crucial role in assessing chronic rhinosinusitis, but lacks objective quantifiable indicators.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to use deep learning for automated sinus segmentation to generate distinct quantitative scores and explore their correlations with disease-specific quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2021 to August 2022, 445 CT data were collected from 2 medical centers. A deep learning model based on nnU-Net was trained for automatic sinus segmentation and internally validated using 300 cases. The remaining 145 cases were split into an external testing set (74 cases) and an independent testing set (71 cases). Two quantitative scores, the quantitative Lund-MacKay score and the quantitative opacification score (QOS), were derived from the segmentation results. The quantitative scores' efficacy was assessed by comparing them with the Lund-MacKay score (LMS), the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test score (SNOT-22), and other clinical variables through correlation analyses. Furthermore, the relationship between quantitative scores and postoperative quality of life improvement was explored using single-factor logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The segmentation model achieved average Dice similarity coefficients of 0.993, 0.978, 0.958, and 0.871 for the training, validation, external testing, and independent testing sets, respectively. Both quantitative scores significantly correlated with the LMS (<i>rho </i>= 0.87 and <i>rho </i>= 0.70, <i>P </i>< .001). Neither score correlated with the total SNOT-22 score, although the modified QOS showed significant correlations with the nasal and sleep subdomains (<i>rho </i>= 0.26 and <i>rho </i>= 0.27, <i>P </i><<i> </i>.05). No significant association was found between quantitative score and postoperative improvement in quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning enables the automated segmentation of sinuses on CT scans, producing quantitative scores of sinus opacification. These automatic quantitative scores may serve as tools for chronic rhinosinusitis assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19458924251313845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251313845\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251313845","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:计算机断层扫描(CT)在评估慢性鼻窦炎中起着至关重要的作用,但缺乏客观的量化指标。目的:本研究旨在利用深度学习进行自动鼻窦分割,以产生不同的定量评分,并探讨其与疾病特异性生活质量的相关性。方法:于2021年7月至2022年8月收集2个医疗中心的445份CT数据。基于nnU-Net的深度学习模型进行了自动鼻窦分割训练,并使用300例进行了内部验证。其余145例分为外部检测组(74例)和独立检测组(71例)。从分割结果中得到两个定量评分,即定量Lund-MacKay评分和定量不透明评分(QOS)。通过相关分析,将定量评分与lmd - mackay评分(LMS)、22项鼻窦结局测试评分(SNOT-22)及其他临床变量进行比较,评价定量评分的疗效。此外,采用单因素logistic回归探讨定量评分与术后生活质量改善的关系。结果:分割模型在训练集、验证集、外部测试集和独立测试集上的平均Dice相似系数分别为0.993、0.978、0.958和0.871。两项定量评分均与LMS显著相关(rho = 0.87、rho = 0.70, P = 0.26、rho = 0.27, P < 0.05)。定量评分与术后生活质量改善无显著相关性。结论:深度学习可以在CT扫描上自动分割鼻窦,产生鼻窦混浊的定量评分。这些自动定量评分可以作为慢性鼻窦炎评估的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning-Derived Quantitative Scores for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Assessment: Correlation With Quality of Life Outcomes.

Background: Computed tomography (CT) plays a crucial role in assessing chronic rhinosinusitis, but lacks objective quantifiable indicators.

Objective: This study aimed to use deep learning for automated sinus segmentation to generate distinct quantitative scores and explore their correlations with disease-specific quality of life.

Methods: From July 2021 to August 2022, 445 CT data were collected from 2 medical centers. A deep learning model based on nnU-Net was trained for automatic sinus segmentation and internally validated using 300 cases. The remaining 145 cases were split into an external testing set (74 cases) and an independent testing set (71 cases). Two quantitative scores, the quantitative Lund-MacKay score and the quantitative opacification score (QOS), were derived from the segmentation results. The quantitative scores' efficacy was assessed by comparing them with the Lund-MacKay score (LMS), the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test score (SNOT-22), and other clinical variables through correlation analyses. Furthermore, the relationship between quantitative scores and postoperative quality of life improvement was explored using single-factor logistic regression.

Result: The segmentation model achieved average Dice similarity coefficients of 0.993, 0.978, 0.958, and 0.871 for the training, validation, external testing, and independent testing sets, respectively. Both quantitative scores significantly correlated with the LMS (rho = 0.87 and rho = 0.70, P < .001). Neither score correlated with the total SNOT-22 score, although the modified QOS showed significant correlations with the nasal and sleep subdomains (rho = 0.26 and rho = 0.27, P <.05). No significant association was found between quantitative score and postoperative improvement in quality of life.

Conclusion: Deep learning enables the automated segmentation of sinuses on CT scans, producing quantitative scores of sinus opacification. These automatic quantitative scores may serve as tools for chronic rhinosinusitis assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信