自我报告参与超声引导手术的性别差异:回顾性分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jacqueline M Godbe, Benjamin S Strnad, Zaid Alkaabneh, Lasya P Daggumati, Malak Itani
{"title":"自我报告参与超声引导手术的性别差异:回顾性分析。","authors":"Jacqueline M Godbe, Benjamin S Strnad, Zaid Alkaabneh, Lasya P Daggumati, Malak Itani","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04805-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Across multiple procedural specialties, female trainees tend to perform fewer procedures and receive less autonomy than their male counterparts. However, there is currently no data on procedure contribution levels for radiology trainees.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether there was a difference in the degree of reported participation in ultrasound-guided procedures between male and female trainees at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study assessed for differences in the reported level of participation between male and female trainees in ultrasound (US) guided paracentesis and thoracentesis. We performed a radiology information system (RIS) search of US guided procedures performed on adult patients from 7/1/2018 to 2/29/2024. Trainee participation levels in the procedures were determined per available reports and classified into independently performed, assisted, or observed. We evaluated the differential reporting of procedure contributions for male and female trainees based on observed vs. expected frequencies, as well as the effect of the trainees' and supervising physicians' gender and experience level on these contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189 trainees (52 female, 137 male) and 58 supervising physicians (18 female and 40 male) were included. The study evaluated 4156 reports, which showed no difference in the percentage of independently completed procedures (females 80.9% vs. 81.9%, X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 4156) = 0.494, p = 0.48) except when supervised by junior physicians less than 2 years out of training (females 81.0% vs. 86.5%, X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1908) = 8.19, p = 0.0042). However, female trainees were more likely than male trainees to report observing procedures (females 9.2% vs. 5.2%, X2 (1, N = 4156) = 21.1, p < 0.00001) rather than actively participating in procedures despite a similar training level; this difference was not observed when supervising physicians were females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female radiology trainees report a similar percentage of independently performed procedures but a lower rate of active participation than male trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in self-reported participation in ultrasound-guided procedures: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline M Godbe, Benjamin S Strnad, Zaid Alkaabneh, Lasya P Daggumati, Malak Itani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04805-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Across multiple procedural specialties, female trainees tend to perform fewer procedures and receive less autonomy than their male counterparts. However, there is currently no data on procedure contribution levels for radiology trainees.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether there was a difference in the degree of reported participation in ultrasound-guided procedures between male and female trainees at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study assessed for differences in the reported level of participation between male and female trainees in ultrasound (US) guided paracentesis and thoracentesis. We performed a radiology information system (RIS) search of US guided procedures performed on adult patients from 7/1/2018 to 2/29/2024. Trainee participation levels in the procedures were determined per available reports and classified into independently performed, assisted, or observed. We evaluated the differential reporting of procedure contributions for male and female trainees based on observed vs. expected frequencies, as well as the effect of the trainees' and supervising physicians' gender and experience level on these contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189 trainees (52 female, 137 male) and 58 supervising physicians (18 female and 40 male) were included. The study evaluated 4156 reports, which showed no difference in the percentage of independently completed procedures (females 80.9% vs. 81.9%, X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 4156) = 0.494, p = 0.48) except when supervised by junior physicians less than 2 years out of training (females 81.0% vs. 86.5%, X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 1908) = 8.19, p = 0.0042). However, female trainees were more likely than male trainees to report observing procedures (females 9.2% vs. 5.2%, X2 (1, N = 4156) = 21.1, p < 0.00001) rather than actively participating in procedures despite a similar training level; this difference was not observed when supervising physicians were females.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female radiology trainees report a similar percentage of independently performed procedures but a lower rate of active participation than male trainees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04805-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04805-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在多个程序专业中,女性受训者往往比男性同行执行更少的程序和获得更少的自主权。然而,目前没有关于放射学受训人员的程序贡献水平的数据。目的:评价我院男女受训者参与超声引导手术的程度是否存在差异。方法:本回顾性研究评估了男性和女性受训者在超声(US)引导下的穿刺和胸穿刺中参与程度的差异。我们对2018年7月1日至2024年2月29日在成人患者中进行的美国指导手术进行了放射学信息系统(RIS)检索。根据现有报告确定受训者参与程序的水平,并将其分为独立执行、辅助或观察。我们根据观察到的频率和预期的频率评估了男性和女性受训者对手术贡献的差异报告,以及受训者和监督医生的性别和经验水平对这些贡献的影响。结果:共纳入学员189人(女52人,男137人),督导医师58人(女18人,男40人)。该研究评估了4156份报告,结果显示独立完成手术的百分比没有差异(女性80.9% vs. 81.9%, X2 (1, N = 4156) = 0.494, p = 0.48),但在培训不足2年的初级医生监督下(女性81.0% vs. 86.5%, X2 (1, N = 1908) = 8.19, p = 0.0042)。然而,女性受训者比男性受训者更有可能报告观察手术(女性9.2% vs. 5.2%, X2 (1, N = 4156) = 21.1, p结论:女性放射学受训者报告独立完成手术的百分比相似,但积极参与率低于男性受训者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender differences in self-reported participation in ultrasound-guided procedures: a retrospective analysis.

Background: Across multiple procedural specialties, female trainees tend to perform fewer procedures and receive less autonomy than their male counterparts. However, there is currently no data on procedure contribution levels for radiology trainees.

Objective: To evaluate whether there was a difference in the degree of reported participation in ultrasound-guided procedures between male and female trainees at our institution.

Methods: This retrospective study assessed for differences in the reported level of participation between male and female trainees in ultrasound (US) guided paracentesis and thoracentesis. We performed a radiology information system (RIS) search of US guided procedures performed on adult patients from 7/1/2018 to 2/29/2024. Trainee participation levels in the procedures were determined per available reports and classified into independently performed, assisted, or observed. We evaluated the differential reporting of procedure contributions for male and female trainees based on observed vs. expected frequencies, as well as the effect of the trainees' and supervising physicians' gender and experience level on these contributions.

Results: A total of 189 trainees (52 female, 137 male) and 58 supervising physicians (18 female and 40 male) were included. The study evaluated 4156 reports, which showed no difference in the percentage of independently completed procedures (females 80.9% vs. 81.9%, X2 (1, N = 4156) = 0.494, p = 0.48) except when supervised by junior physicians less than 2 years out of training (females 81.0% vs. 86.5%, X2 (1, N = 1908) = 8.19, p = 0.0042). However, female trainees were more likely than male trainees to report observing procedures (females 9.2% vs. 5.2%, X2 (1, N = 4156) = 21.1, p < 0.00001) rather than actively participating in procedures despite a similar training level; this difference was not observed when supervising physicians were females.

Conclusion: Female radiology trainees report a similar percentage of independently performed procedures but a lower rate of active participation than male trainees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信