运用认知网络分析研究在线协作学习中的认知参与过程。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jin Zhou , Xuejing Han
{"title":"运用认知网络分析研究在线协作学习中的认知参与过程。","authors":"Jin Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuejing Han","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive engagement is essential for meaningful learning and is marked by interdependence and periodicity. However, the dynamic process and temporal aspects of cognitive engagement in collaborative learning have not been fully explored. This study investigates the cognitive engagement processes of different performance groups in online collaborative learning by analyzing discourse data from three activities. Content analysis and epistemic network analysis revealed that high-performing groups exhibited more task-regulated behaviors and stronger co-occurrences between <em>perspective expression</em> and <em>perspective elaboration</em>, as well as between <em>perspective expression</em> and <em>low-level regulation</em>. In contrast, low-performing groups showed more co-occurrences between <em>perspective expression</em> and <em>information sharing</em>. Additionally, the high- and low- performing groups demonstrated different patterns of cognitive engagement at various task stages. These findings offer practical guidance for designing effective collaborative learning activities to enhance cognitive engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 104737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using epistemic network analysis to examine the cognitive engagement process in online collaborative learning\",\"authors\":\"Jin Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuejing Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cognitive engagement is essential for meaningful learning and is marked by interdependence and periodicity. However, the dynamic process and temporal aspects of cognitive engagement in collaborative learning have not been fully explored. This study investigates the cognitive engagement processes of different performance groups in online collaborative learning by analyzing discourse data from three activities. Content analysis and epistemic network analysis revealed that high-performing groups exhibited more task-regulated behaviors and stronger co-occurrences between <em>perspective expression</em> and <em>perspective elaboration</em>, as well as between <em>perspective expression</em> and <em>low-level regulation</em>. In contrast, low-performing groups showed more co-occurrences between <em>perspective expression</em> and <em>information sharing</em>. Additionally, the high- and low- performing groups demonstrated different patterns of cognitive engagement at various task stages. These findings offer practical guidance for designing effective collaborative learning activities to enhance cognitive engagement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"253 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825000502\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825000502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知参与对于有意义的学习至关重要,其特点是相互依存和周期性。然而,协作学习中认知参与的动态过程和时间方面尚未得到充分的探讨。本研究通过分析三个活动的话语数据,探讨了不同表现群体在在线协作学习中的认知投入过程。内容分析和认知网络分析表明,高绩效群体表现出更多的任务调节行为,观点表达与观点阐述、观点表达与低水平调节的共现性更强。相比之下,表现不佳的小组在观点表达和信息共享之间表现出更多的共同现象。此外,高绩效组和低绩效组在不同的任务阶段表现出不同的认知参与模式。这些发现为设计有效的协作学习活动以增强认知参与提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using epistemic network analysis to examine the cognitive engagement process in online collaborative learning
Cognitive engagement is essential for meaningful learning and is marked by interdependence and periodicity. However, the dynamic process and temporal aspects of cognitive engagement in collaborative learning have not been fully explored. This study investigates the cognitive engagement processes of different performance groups in online collaborative learning by analyzing discourse data from three activities. Content analysis and epistemic network analysis revealed that high-performing groups exhibited more task-regulated behaviors and stronger co-occurrences between perspective expression and perspective elaboration, as well as between perspective expression and low-level regulation. In contrast, low-performing groups showed more co-occurrences between perspective expression and information sharing. Additionally, the high- and low- performing groups demonstrated different patterns of cognitive engagement at various task stages. These findings offer practical guidance for designing effective collaborative learning activities to enhance cognitive engagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信