对全球蜜蜂病原体-瓦螨治疗效果的系统荟萃分析。

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178228
Darren P O'Connell, Kevin Healy, Jack Wilton, Cristina Botías, Julia C Jones
{"title":"对全球蜜蜂病原体-瓦螨治疗效果的系统荟萃分析。","authors":"Darren P O'Connell, Kevin Healy, Jack Wilton, Cristina Botías, Julia C Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The western honey bee Apis mellifera is the world's most important managed pollinator. However, globally honey bees have been facing increasing colony losses due to a combination of stress factors. Foremost among these is the invasive mite Varroa destructor, which is the pathogen most commonly linked to colony losses. Despite intensive research focus on this problem, V. destructor management remains extremely challenging, with no definitive treatment approach. A variety of synthetic chemical, agriculturally organic chemical, biological, and physical treatments have been trialled and used in V. destructor management, each with benefits and drawbacks. Here, we carried out a first systematic meta-analysis of the comparative effectiveness of V. destructor treatment methods. We incorporated data from 138 studies from 30 countries, across five continents and found that overall, synthetic chemicals show high effectiveness as a treatment due to their ability to suppress the V. destructor mite. In our analyses of honey bee responses, there was some evidence that synthetic chemicals may have an overall negative impact on them, even while suppressing V. destructor. For improving honey bee health measures, biological treatment methods showed the most positive effect, but with a relatively low sample size. Our study highlights that there is a relative lack of studies on biological management methods, with far more focus in the literature on chemical treatments. We show that, until biological methods receive greater research attention, agriculturally organic methods likely provide the best current treatment option, because they are well studied, nearly as effective at suppressing V. destructor as synthetic chemicals, and less associated with negative impacts on honey bees. Varroa destructor remains a major threat to honey bees globally, with the last large V. destructor free zone (Australia) having now been invaded, emphasising the need to fill these knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"178228"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic meta-analysis of the efficacy of treatments for a global honey bee pathogen - the Varroa mite.\",\"authors\":\"Darren P O'Connell, Kevin Healy, Jack Wilton, Cristina Botías, Julia C Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The western honey bee Apis mellifera is the world's most important managed pollinator. However, globally honey bees have been facing increasing colony losses due to a combination of stress factors. Foremost among these is the invasive mite Varroa destructor, which is the pathogen most commonly linked to colony losses. Despite intensive research focus on this problem, V. destructor management remains extremely challenging, with no definitive treatment approach. A variety of synthetic chemical, agriculturally organic chemical, biological, and physical treatments have been trialled and used in V. destructor management, each with benefits and drawbacks. Here, we carried out a first systematic meta-analysis of the comparative effectiveness of V. destructor treatment methods. We incorporated data from 138 studies from 30 countries, across five continents and found that overall, synthetic chemicals show high effectiveness as a treatment due to their ability to suppress the V. destructor mite. In our analyses of honey bee responses, there was some evidence that synthetic chemicals may have an overall negative impact on them, even while suppressing V. destructor. For improving honey bee health measures, biological treatment methods showed the most positive effect, but with a relatively low sample size. Our study highlights that there is a relative lack of studies on biological management methods, with far more focus in the literature on chemical treatments. We show that, until biological methods receive greater research attention, agriculturally organic methods likely provide the best current treatment option, because they are well studied, nearly as effective at suppressing V. destructor as synthetic chemicals, and less associated with negative impacts on honey bees. Varroa destructor remains a major threat to honey bees globally, with the last large V. destructor free zone (Australia) having now been invaded, emphasising the need to fill these knowledge gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"178228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178228\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)是世界上最重要的授粉者。然而,在全球范围内,由于压力因素的综合作用,蜜蜂正面临着越来越多的群体损失。其中最重要的是侵入性瓦螨破坏者,这是最常见的与群体损失有关的病原体。尽管对这一问题进行了深入的研究,但破坏弧菌的管理仍然极具挑战性,没有明确的治疗方法。各种合成化学、农业有机化学、生物和物理处理方法已经试验并用于灭虫管理,每种方法都有优缺点。在这里,我们对V. destructor治疗方法的比较有效性进行了首次系统的荟萃分析。我们整合了来自五大洲30个国家的138项研究的数据,发现总体而言,合成化学品作为一种治疗方法显示出很高的有效性,因为它们能够抑制毁灭弧菌螨。在我们对蜜蜂反应的分析中,有一些证据表明,即使在抑制V. destructor的同时,合成化学物质也可能对它们产生总体的负面影响。对于改善蜜蜂健康的措施,生物处理方法的效果最为积极,但样本量相对较小。我们的研究强调,生物管理方法的研究相对缺乏,更多的是关注化学处理的文献。我们表明,在生物方法得到更多的研究关注之前,农业有机方法可能是目前最好的治疗选择,因为它们得到了很好的研究,在抑制V. destructor方面几乎和合成化学品一样有效,而且对蜜蜂的负面影响更小。瓦罗亚破坏者仍然是全球蜜蜂的主要威胁,最后一个无瓦罗亚破坏者的区域(澳大利亚)现在已经被入侵,强调了填补这些知识空白的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic meta-analysis of the efficacy of treatments for a global honey bee pathogen - the Varroa mite.

The western honey bee Apis mellifera is the world's most important managed pollinator. However, globally honey bees have been facing increasing colony losses due to a combination of stress factors. Foremost among these is the invasive mite Varroa destructor, which is the pathogen most commonly linked to colony losses. Despite intensive research focus on this problem, V. destructor management remains extremely challenging, with no definitive treatment approach. A variety of synthetic chemical, agriculturally organic chemical, biological, and physical treatments have been trialled and used in V. destructor management, each with benefits and drawbacks. Here, we carried out a first systematic meta-analysis of the comparative effectiveness of V. destructor treatment methods. We incorporated data from 138 studies from 30 countries, across five continents and found that overall, synthetic chemicals show high effectiveness as a treatment due to their ability to suppress the V. destructor mite. In our analyses of honey bee responses, there was some evidence that synthetic chemicals may have an overall negative impact on them, even while suppressing V. destructor. For improving honey bee health measures, biological treatment methods showed the most positive effect, but with a relatively low sample size. Our study highlights that there is a relative lack of studies on biological management methods, with far more focus in the literature on chemical treatments. We show that, until biological methods receive greater research attention, agriculturally organic methods likely provide the best current treatment option, because they are well studied, nearly as effective at suppressing V. destructor as synthetic chemicals, and less associated with negative impacts on honey bees. Varroa destructor remains a major threat to honey bees globally, with the last large V. destructor free zone (Australia) having now been invaded, emphasising the need to fill these knowledge gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信