质疑“主观幸福感”的概念:区分幸福和快乐。

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Elias L Khalil
{"title":"质疑“主观幸福感”的概念:区分幸福和快乐。","authors":"Elias L Khalil","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper criticizes the \"subjective well-being\" concept, as this concept eliminates the difference between wellbeing and happiness. This paper proposes that wellbeing and happiness are two gauges of satisfaction that measure different quantities. It establishes its proposed thesis by examining how the social welfare function (SWF) accommodates altruism as opposed to caring understood as love. Altruism is an act related to wellbeing, whereas caring in the sense of love is an act related to happiness. SWF can include neither altruism nor caring-but for totally different reasons that demonstrate that the two prosocial acts are different. Therefore, the duo gauges of satisfaction (wellbeing and happiness) cannot be amalgamated into the \"subjective well-being\" concept.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"253 ","pages":"104702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the 'subjective well-being' concept: Distinguishing wellbeing and happiness.\",\"authors\":\"Elias L Khalil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper criticizes the \\\"subjective well-being\\\" concept, as this concept eliminates the difference between wellbeing and happiness. This paper proposes that wellbeing and happiness are two gauges of satisfaction that measure different quantities. It establishes its proposed thesis by examining how the social welfare function (SWF) accommodates altruism as opposed to caring understood as love. Altruism is an act related to wellbeing, whereas caring in the sense of love is an act related to happiness. SWF can include neither altruism nor caring-but for totally different reasons that demonstrate that the two prosocial acts are different. Therefore, the duo gauges of satisfaction (wellbeing and happiness) cannot be amalgamated into the \\\"subjective well-being\\\" concept.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"volume\":\"253 \",\"pages\":\"104702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104702\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文批判了“主观幸福感”的概念,因为这个概念消除了幸福和幸福之间的区别。本文提出,幸福和幸福是两个衡量不同数量的满意度指标。它通过研究社会福利函数(SWF)如何适应利他主义,而不是被理解为爱的关怀,来确立其提出的论点。利他主义是一种与幸福有关的行为,而爱的关怀是一种与幸福有关的行为。主权财富基金既不包括利他主义,也不包括关心——但出于完全不同的原因,这表明这两种亲社会行为是不同的。因此,满意度的双重测量(幸福和快乐)不能合并到“主观幸福感”的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questioning the 'subjective well-being' concept: Distinguishing wellbeing and happiness.

This paper criticizes the "subjective well-being" concept, as this concept eliminates the difference between wellbeing and happiness. This paper proposes that wellbeing and happiness are two gauges of satisfaction that measure different quantities. It establishes its proposed thesis by examining how the social welfare function (SWF) accommodates altruism as opposed to caring understood as love. Altruism is an act related to wellbeing, whereas caring in the sense of love is an act related to happiness. SWF can include neither altruism nor caring-but for totally different reasons that demonstrate that the two prosocial acts are different. Therefore, the duo gauges of satisfaction (wellbeing and happiness) cannot be amalgamated into the "subjective well-being" concept.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信