Gerard Aime Kenfack Teponnou, Anton Joubert, Saskia Spaltman, Marthinus van der Merwe, Edda Zangenberg, Sharon Sawe, Paolo Denti, Sandra Castel, Francesca Conradie, Richard Court, Gary Maartens, Lubbe Wiesner
{"title":"液相色谱-质谱联用法测定干血斑中贝达喹啉、n-去甲基贝达喹啉、利奈唑胺、左氧氟沙星和氯法齐明含量的建立和验证","authors":"Gerard Aime Kenfack Teponnou, Anton Joubert, Saskia Spaltman, Marthinus van der Merwe, Edda Zangenberg, Sharon Sawe, Paolo Denti, Sandra Castel, Francesca Conradie, Richard Court, Gary Maartens, Lubbe Wiesner","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dried blood spot (DBS) assays to quantify novel and repurposed drugs for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) would facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring in low-middle income settings, considering their ease of application and simple sample storage requirements. We describe a DBS method for the simultaneous quantification of bedaquiline and metabolite N-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine. The analytes were extracted from the matrix and isolated by solid-phase extraction. Two LC-MS/MS systems were used, optimized for the separate analysis of the more polar compounds (linezolid and levofloxacin), and less polar compounds (bedaquiline, N-desmethyl bedaquiline, and clofazimine), employing gradient elution. Electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring were used to quantify the analytes on a Sciex API3200 and an API5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, for the more polar and less polar analytes, respectively. Isotopically labelled internal standards were used to compensate for variability in the quantification of each analyte. The method was validated according to international guidelines and applied to samples from a clinical trial. We performed correlation and agreement analysis of the DBS assay and in-house plasma methods using Deming regressions and Bland-Altman plots. Coefficients of correlation between measured plasma and DBS concentrations ranged from 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.902) to 0.989 (95% CI: 0.985-0.992). More than 67% of the samples showed a difference between the observed and estimated plasma concentrations within 20% of their means, meeting EMA requirements for method reproducibility and demonstrating the interchangeability of our DBS and plasma LC-MS/MS methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":"1252 ","pages":"124470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS multiplex assay for the quantification of bedaquiline, n-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine in dried blood spots.\",\"authors\":\"Gerard Aime Kenfack Teponnou, Anton Joubert, Saskia Spaltman, Marthinus van der Merwe, Edda Zangenberg, Sharon Sawe, Paolo Denti, Sandra Castel, Francesca Conradie, Richard Court, Gary Maartens, Lubbe Wiesner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dried blood spot (DBS) assays to quantify novel and repurposed drugs for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) would facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring in low-middle income settings, considering their ease of application and simple sample storage requirements. We describe a DBS method for the simultaneous quantification of bedaquiline and metabolite N-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine. The analytes were extracted from the matrix and isolated by solid-phase extraction. Two LC-MS/MS systems were used, optimized for the separate analysis of the more polar compounds (linezolid and levofloxacin), and less polar compounds (bedaquiline, N-desmethyl bedaquiline, and clofazimine), employing gradient elution. Electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring were used to quantify the analytes on a Sciex API3200 and an API5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, for the more polar and less polar analytes, respectively. Isotopically labelled internal standards were used to compensate for variability in the quantification of each analyte. The method was validated according to international guidelines and applied to samples from a clinical trial. We performed correlation and agreement analysis of the DBS assay and in-house plasma methods using Deming regressions and Bland-Altman plots. Coefficients of correlation between measured plasma and DBS concentrations ranged from 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.902) to 0.989 (95% CI: 0.985-0.992). More than 67% of the samples showed a difference between the observed and estimated plasma concentrations within 20% of their means, meeting EMA requirements for method reproducibility and demonstrating the interchangeability of our DBS and plasma LC-MS/MS methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"volume\":\"1252 \",\"pages\":\"124470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS multiplex assay for the quantification of bedaquiline, n-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine in dried blood spots.
Dried blood spot (DBS) assays to quantify novel and repurposed drugs for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) would facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring in low-middle income settings, considering their ease of application and simple sample storage requirements. We describe a DBS method for the simultaneous quantification of bedaquiline and metabolite N-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine. The analytes were extracted from the matrix and isolated by solid-phase extraction. Two LC-MS/MS systems were used, optimized for the separate analysis of the more polar compounds (linezolid and levofloxacin), and less polar compounds (bedaquiline, N-desmethyl bedaquiline, and clofazimine), employing gradient elution. Electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring were used to quantify the analytes on a Sciex API3200 and an API5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, for the more polar and less polar analytes, respectively. Isotopically labelled internal standards were used to compensate for variability in the quantification of each analyte. The method was validated according to international guidelines and applied to samples from a clinical trial. We performed correlation and agreement analysis of the DBS assay and in-house plasma methods using Deming regressions and Bland-Altman plots. Coefficients of correlation between measured plasma and DBS concentrations ranged from 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.902) to 0.989 (95% CI: 0.985-0.992). More than 67% of the samples showed a difference between the observed and estimated plasma concentrations within 20% of their means, meeting EMA requirements for method reproducibility and demonstrating the interchangeability of our DBS and plasma LC-MS/MS methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis.
Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches.
Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.