液相色谱-质谱联用法测定干血斑中贝达喹啉、n-去甲基贝达喹啉、利奈唑胺、左氧氟沙星和氯法齐明含量的建立和验证

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Gerard Aime Kenfack Teponnou, Anton Joubert, Saskia Spaltman, Marthinus van der Merwe, Edda Zangenberg, Sharon Sawe, Paolo Denti, Sandra Castel, Francesca Conradie, Richard Court, Gary Maartens, Lubbe Wiesner
{"title":"液相色谱-质谱联用法测定干血斑中贝达喹啉、n-去甲基贝达喹啉、利奈唑胺、左氧氟沙星和氯法齐明含量的建立和验证","authors":"Gerard Aime Kenfack Teponnou, Anton Joubert, Saskia Spaltman, Marthinus van der Merwe, Edda Zangenberg, Sharon Sawe, Paolo Denti, Sandra Castel, Francesca Conradie, Richard Court, Gary Maartens, Lubbe Wiesner","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dried blood spot (DBS) assays to quantify novel and repurposed drugs for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) would facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring in low-middle income settings, considering their ease of application and simple sample storage requirements. We describe a DBS method for the simultaneous quantification of bedaquiline and metabolite N-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine. The analytes were extracted from the matrix and isolated by solid-phase extraction. Two LC-MS/MS systems were used, optimized for the separate analysis of the more polar compounds (linezolid and levofloxacin), and less polar compounds (bedaquiline, N-desmethyl bedaquiline, and clofazimine), employing gradient elution. Electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring were used to quantify the analytes on a Sciex API3200 and an API5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, for the more polar and less polar analytes, respectively. Isotopically labelled internal standards were used to compensate for variability in the quantification of each analyte. The method was validated according to international guidelines and applied to samples from a clinical trial. We performed correlation and agreement analysis of the DBS assay and in-house plasma methods using Deming regressions and Bland-Altman plots. Coefficients of correlation between measured plasma and DBS concentrations ranged from 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.902) to 0.989 (95% CI: 0.985-0.992). More than 67% of the samples showed a difference between the observed and estimated plasma concentrations within 20% of their means, meeting EMA requirements for method reproducibility and demonstrating the interchangeability of our DBS and plasma LC-MS/MS methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":"1252 ","pages":"124470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS multiplex assay for the quantification of bedaquiline, n-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine in dried blood spots.\",\"authors\":\"Gerard Aime Kenfack Teponnou, Anton Joubert, Saskia Spaltman, Marthinus van der Merwe, Edda Zangenberg, Sharon Sawe, Paolo Denti, Sandra Castel, Francesca Conradie, Richard Court, Gary Maartens, Lubbe Wiesner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dried blood spot (DBS) assays to quantify novel and repurposed drugs for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) would facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring in low-middle income settings, considering their ease of application and simple sample storage requirements. We describe a DBS method for the simultaneous quantification of bedaquiline and metabolite N-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine. The analytes were extracted from the matrix and isolated by solid-phase extraction. Two LC-MS/MS systems were used, optimized for the separate analysis of the more polar compounds (linezolid and levofloxacin), and less polar compounds (bedaquiline, N-desmethyl bedaquiline, and clofazimine), employing gradient elution. Electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring were used to quantify the analytes on a Sciex API3200 and an API5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, for the more polar and less polar analytes, respectively. Isotopically labelled internal standards were used to compensate for variability in the quantification of each analyte. The method was validated according to international guidelines and applied to samples from a clinical trial. We performed correlation and agreement analysis of the DBS assay and in-house plasma methods using Deming regressions and Bland-Altman plots. Coefficients of correlation between measured plasma and DBS concentrations ranged from 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.902) to 0.989 (95% CI: 0.985-0.992). More than 67% of the samples showed a difference between the observed and estimated plasma concentrations within 20% of their means, meeting EMA requirements for method reproducibility and demonstrating the interchangeability of our DBS and plasma LC-MS/MS methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"volume\":\"1252 \",\"pages\":\"124470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到干血点(DBS)检测易于应用和简单的样品储存要求,用于定量治疗利福平耐药结核病(RR-TB)的新药和再用途药物,将促进中低收入环境下的药代动力学研究和治疗药物监测。我们描述了一种同时定量贝达喹啉及其代谢物n -去甲基贝达喹啉、利奈唑胺、左氧氟沙星和氯法齐明的DBS方法。分析物从基质中提取,用固相萃取法分离。采用两套LC-MS/MS系统,采用梯度洗脱对极性较高的化合物(利奈唑胺和左氧氟沙星)和极性较低的化合物(贝达喹啉、n -去甲基贝达喹啉和氯法齐明)进行分离分析。在Sciex API3200和API5500三重四极质谱仪上使用电喷雾电离和多重反应监测分别对极性较高和极性较低的分析物进行定量。使用同位素标记的内部标准来补偿每种分析物定量的可变性。该方法根据国际准则进行了验证,并应用于临床试验样本。我们使用Deming回归和Bland-Altman图对DBS测定法和内部血浆方法进行了相关性和一致性分析。血浆与DBS浓度的相关系数范围为0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.902)至0.989 (95% CI: 0.985-0.992)。超过67%的样品显示观察到的和估计的血浆浓度之间的差异在其平均值的20%以内,满足EMA对方法重复性的要求,并证明了我们的DBS和血浆LC-MS/MS方法的互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS multiplex assay for the quantification of bedaquiline, n-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine in dried blood spots.

Dried blood spot (DBS) assays to quantify novel and repurposed drugs for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) would facilitate pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring in low-middle income settings, considering their ease of application and simple sample storage requirements. We describe a DBS method for the simultaneous quantification of bedaquiline and metabolite N-desmethyl bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, and clofazimine. The analytes were extracted from the matrix and isolated by solid-phase extraction. Two LC-MS/MS systems were used, optimized for the separate analysis of the more polar compounds (linezolid and levofloxacin), and less polar compounds (bedaquiline, N-desmethyl bedaquiline, and clofazimine), employing gradient elution. Electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring were used to quantify the analytes on a Sciex API3200 and an API5500 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, for the more polar and less polar analytes, respectively. Isotopically labelled internal standards were used to compensate for variability in the quantification of each analyte. The method was validated according to international guidelines and applied to samples from a clinical trial. We performed correlation and agreement analysis of the DBS assay and in-house plasma methods using Deming regressions and Bland-Altman plots. Coefficients of correlation between measured plasma and DBS concentrations ranged from 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.902) to 0.989 (95% CI: 0.985-0.992). More than 67% of the samples showed a difference between the observed and estimated plasma concentrations within 20% of their means, meeting EMA requirements for method reproducibility and demonstrating the interchangeability of our DBS and plasma LC-MS/MS methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography B
Journal of Chromatography B 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis. Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches. Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信