一种新型抗震颤矫形器抑制特发性震颤:一项随机交叉试验。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Winfred Mugge, Liset E M Elstgeest, Milan van Ginkel, Lucas Pol, IJsbrand de Lange, Nicola Pambakian, Alvaro Assis de Souza, Rick C Helmich, Daan J Kamphuis
{"title":"一种新型抗震颤矫形器抑制特发性震颤:一项随机交叉试验。","authors":"Winfred Mugge, Liset E M Elstgeest, Milan van Ginkel, Lucas Pol, IJsbrand de Lange, Nicola Pambakian, Alvaro Assis de Souza, Rick C Helmich, Daan J Kamphuis","doi":"10.1002/mds.30082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Essential tremor (ET) is characterized by action tremor of the arms, which can interfere substantially with daily activities. Pharmacotherapy may be ineffective or associated with side effects, and stereotactic surgery is invasive. Hence, new accessible treatment options are urgently needed. An easy-to-use and lightweight orthotic device that exerts joint damping may provide an alternative solution for reducing tremor in daily activities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal was to assess the efficacy of a novel anti-tremor orthosis (STIL) in reducing clinical and accelerometry measures of distal arm tremor in ET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized crossover single-blinded trial in 24 ET patients in a hospital setting, we compared three conditions: no orthosis (baseline), a sham device, and the anti-tremor orthosis (order randomized). The orthosis, but not the sham device, passively damped joints in the forearm. Participants performed seven tasks from the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS). The two co-primary outcome measures were: clinical tremor severity (video-scored TETRAS) and tremor power (accelerometry). Patient satisfaction was self-assessed using the Dutch Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology. Conditions were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The anti-tremor orthosis significantly reduced TETRAS scores compared to sham and baseline (baseline: 19.0 ± 3.2, sham: 13.7 ± 3.9, orthosis: 9.9 ± 3.6; mean ± standard deviation). Similar effects were observed for tremor power, which was reduced by 87.4% (orthosis vs. baseline) and 59.5% (orthosis vs. sham) across all tasks. A total of 71% of participants were (very) satisfied and 12.5% reported minor adverse events (discomfort/redness of skin).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anti-tremor orthosis had a clinically relevant tremor-reducing effect in ET in a controlled setting, offering potential for a new treatment to manage ET in daily activities. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essential Tremor Suppression with a Novel Anti-Tremor Orthosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Winfred Mugge, Liset E M Elstgeest, Milan van Ginkel, Lucas Pol, IJsbrand de Lange, Nicola Pambakian, Alvaro Assis de Souza, Rick C Helmich, Daan J Kamphuis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mds.30082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Essential tremor (ET) is characterized by action tremor of the arms, which can interfere substantially with daily activities. Pharmacotherapy may be ineffective or associated with side effects, and stereotactic surgery is invasive. Hence, new accessible treatment options are urgently needed. An easy-to-use and lightweight orthotic device that exerts joint damping may provide an alternative solution for reducing tremor in daily activities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal was to assess the efficacy of a novel anti-tremor orthosis (STIL) in reducing clinical and accelerometry measures of distal arm tremor in ET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized crossover single-blinded trial in 24 ET patients in a hospital setting, we compared three conditions: no orthosis (baseline), a sham device, and the anti-tremor orthosis (order randomized). The orthosis, but not the sham device, passively damped joints in the forearm. Participants performed seven tasks from the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS). The two co-primary outcome measures were: clinical tremor severity (video-scored TETRAS) and tremor power (accelerometry). Patient satisfaction was self-assessed using the Dutch Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology. Conditions were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The anti-tremor orthosis significantly reduced TETRAS scores compared to sham and baseline (baseline: 19.0 ± 3.2, sham: 13.7 ± 3.9, orthosis: 9.9 ± 3.6; mean ± standard deviation). Similar effects were observed for tremor power, which was reduced by 87.4% (orthosis vs. baseline) and 59.5% (orthosis vs. sham) across all tasks. A total of 71% of participants were (very) satisfied and 12.5% reported minor adverse events (discomfort/redness of skin).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anti-tremor orthosis had a clinically relevant tremor-reducing effect in ET in a controlled setting, offering potential for a new treatment to manage ET in daily activities. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特发性震颤(ET)的特征是手臂的动作性震颤,它可以严重干扰日常活动。药物治疗可能无效或伴有副作用,立体定向手术是侵入性的。因此,迫切需要新的可获得的治疗方案。一种易于使用且重量轻的矫形器可以施加关节阻尼,为减少日常活动中的震颤提供了另一种解决方案。目的:我们的目的是评估一种新型抗震颤矫形器(STIL)在减少ET远端手臂震颤的临床和加速度测量方面的疗效。方法:在一项随机交叉单盲试验中,我们在医院环境中对24例ET患者进行了三种情况的比较:无矫形器(基线),假装置和抗震颤矫形器(顺序随机)。矫形器,而不是假装置,被动地抑制前臂关节。参与者执行震颤研究小组基本震颤评定量表(TETRAS)中的七项任务。两个共同的主要结局指标是:临床震颤严重程度(视频评分的TETRAS)和震颤功率(加速度计)。使用荷兰魁北克辅助技术用户满意度评估对患者满意度进行自我评估。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较条件。结果:与假手术和基线相比,抗震颤矫形器显著降低了TETRAS评分(基线:19.0±3.2,假手术:13.7±3.9,矫形器:9.9±3.6;平均值±标准差)。在所有任务中,震颤功率也观察到类似的效果,减少了87.4%(矫形器与基线)和59.5%(矫形器与假手术)。共有71%的参与者(非常)满意,12.5%的参与者报告了轻微的不良事件(不适/皮肤发红)。结论:在控制环境下,抗震颤矫形器对ET具有临床相关的震颤减少作用,为管理日常活动中的ET提供了一种新的治疗方法。©2025作者。Wiley期刊有限责任公司代表国际帕金森和运动障碍学会出版的《运动障碍》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Essential Tremor Suppression with a Novel Anti-Tremor Orthosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Background: Essential tremor (ET) is characterized by action tremor of the arms, which can interfere substantially with daily activities. Pharmacotherapy may be ineffective or associated with side effects, and stereotactic surgery is invasive. Hence, new accessible treatment options are urgently needed. An easy-to-use and lightweight orthotic device that exerts joint damping may provide an alternative solution for reducing tremor in daily activities.

Objective: Our goal was to assess the efficacy of a novel anti-tremor orthosis (STIL) in reducing clinical and accelerometry measures of distal arm tremor in ET.

Methods: In a randomized crossover single-blinded trial in 24 ET patients in a hospital setting, we compared three conditions: no orthosis (baseline), a sham device, and the anti-tremor orthosis (order randomized). The orthosis, but not the sham device, passively damped joints in the forearm. Participants performed seven tasks from the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS). The two co-primary outcome measures were: clinical tremor severity (video-scored TETRAS) and tremor power (accelerometry). Patient satisfaction was self-assessed using the Dutch Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology. Conditions were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: The anti-tremor orthosis significantly reduced TETRAS scores compared to sham and baseline (baseline: 19.0 ± 3.2, sham: 13.7 ± 3.9, orthosis: 9.9 ± 3.6; mean ± standard deviation). Similar effects were observed for tremor power, which was reduced by 87.4% (orthosis vs. baseline) and 59.5% (orthosis vs. sham) across all tasks. A total of 71% of participants were (very) satisfied and 12.5% reported minor adverse events (discomfort/redness of skin).

Conclusion: The anti-tremor orthosis had a clinically relevant tremor-reducing effect in ET in a controlled setting, offering potential for a new treatment to manage ET in daily activities. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信