晚期肺癌患者使用姑息治疗和临终关怀的驱动因素

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70518
Megan C Edmonds, Melissa Mazor, Mayuri Jain, Lihua Li, Marsha Augustin, José Morillo, Olivia S Allen, Amina Avril, Juan P Wisnivesky, Cardinale B Smith
{"title":"晚期肺癌患者使用姑息治疗和临终关怀的驱动因素","authors":"Megan C Edmonds, Melissa Mazor, Mayuri Jain, Lihua Li, Marsha Augustin, José Morillo, Olivia S Allen, Amina Avril, Juan P Wisnivesky, Cardinale B Smith","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite rigorous evidence of improved quality of life and longer survival, disparities in the utilization of palliative and hospice care persist for racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. This study evaluated the impact of psychosocial factors on utilization of these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced lung cancer were recruited at a large academic urban hospital. Patients were surveyed about their knowledge of palliative care and hospice and their beliefs regarding medical mistrust, lung cancer care, palliative care and hospice. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between mistrust, knowledge and beliefs among the entire cohort and minority (Black and Hispanic) and non-minority patients on utilization of palliative care consultation and hospice care use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine of the enrolled participants had a mean age of 64 years. Minority patients were more likely to receive a palliative care referral (p < 0.001) and attend a consult (p = 0.003). Similarly, they were more likely to receive a hospice referral (p = 0.04), however there was no difference in hospice care use based on minority status (p = 0.102). In our adjusted model, older patients and those reporting negative lung cancer beliefs were more likely to receive hospice care (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.004-1.138; OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.002-1.093, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minority patients with advanced lung cancer were more likely to receive a palliative care referral and specialty level consultation when compared to non-minority patients. Our work highlights the importance of proactive referral processes in facilitating access to palliative and hospice services, particularly among younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 2","pages":"e70518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers of Palliative Care and Hospice Use Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Megan C Edmonds, Melissa Mazor, Mayuri Jain, Lihua Li, Marsha Augustin, José Morillo, Olivia S Allen, Amina Avril, Juan P Wisnivesky, Cardinale B Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite rigorous evidence of improved quality of life and longer survival, disparities in the utilization of palliative and hospice care persist for racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. This study evaluated the impact of psychosocial factors on utilization of these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced lung cancer were recruited at a large academic urban hospital. Patients were surveyed about their knowledge of palliative care and hospice and their beliefs regarding medical mistrust, lung cancer care, palliative care and hospice. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between mistrust, knowledge and beliefs among the entire cohort and minority (Black and Hispanic) and non-minority patients on utilization of palliative care consultation and hospice care use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine of the enrolled participants had a mean age of 64 years. Minority patients were more likely to receive a palliative care referral (p < 0.001) and attend a consult (p = 0.003). Similarly, they were more likely to receive a hospice referral (p = 0.04), however there was no difference in hospice care use based on minority status (p = 0.102). In our adjusted model, older patients and those reporting negative lung cancer beliefs were more likely to receive hospice care (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.004-1.138; OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.002-1.093, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minority patients with advanced lung cancer were more likely to receive a palliative care referral and specialty level consultation when compared to non-minority patients. Our work highlights the importance of proactive referral processes in facilitating access to palliative and hospice services, particularly among younger patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"e70518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70518\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管有严格的证据表明,少数种族和民族癌症患者的生活质量得到改善,生存期延长,但在姑息治疗和临终关怀的使用方面仍然存在差异。本研究评估了心理社会因素对这些服务利用的影响。方法:在某大型学术性城市医院招募晚期肺癌患者。调查了患者对姑息治疗和临终关怀的认识,以及他们对医疗不信任、肺癌治疗、姑息治疗和临终关怀的看法。我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来检验整个队列、少数族裔(黑人和西班牙裔)和非少数族裔患者对姑息治疗咨询和临终关怀使用的不信任、知识和信念之间的关系。结果:99名参与者的平均年龄为64岁。结论:与非少数民族患者相比,少数民族晚期肺癌患者更有可能接受姑息治疗转诊和专科水平的咨询。我们的工作强调了主动转诊过程在促进获得姑息治疗和临终关怀服务方面的重要性,特别是在年轻患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drivers of Palliative Care and Hospice Use Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.

Purpose: Despite rigorous evidence of improved quality of life and longer survival, disparities in the utilization of palliative and hospice care persist for racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. This study evaluated the impact of psychosocial factors on utilization of these services.

Methods: Patients with advanced lung cancer were recruited at a large academic urban hospital. Patients were surveyed about their knowledge of palliative care and hospice and their beliefs regarding medical mistrust, lung cancer care, palliative care and hospice. We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the association between mistrust, knowledge and beliefs among the entire cohort and minority (Black and Hispanic) and non-minority patients on utilization of palliative care consultation and hospice care use.

Results: Ninety-nine of the enrolled participants had a mean age of 64 years. Minority patients were more likely to receive a palliative care referral (p < 0.001) and attend a consult (p = 0.003). Similarly, they were more likely to receive a hospice referral (p = 0.04), however there was no difference in hospice care use based on minority status (p = 0.102). In our adjusted model, older patients and those reporting negative lung cancer beliefs were more likely to receive hospice care (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.004-1.138; OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.002-1.093, respectively).

Conclusion: Minority patients with advanced lung cancer were more likely to receive a palliative care referral and specialty level consultation when compared to non-minority patients. Our work highlights the importance of proactive referral processes in facilitating access to palliative and hospice services, particularly among younger patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信