应用动态网络模型诊断正常间期脑电图癫痫。

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Patrick Myers, Kristin M Gunnarsdottir, Adam Li, Vlad Razskazovskiy, Jeff Craley, Alana Chandler, Dale Wyeth, Edmund Wyeth, Kareem A Zaghloul, Sara K Inati, Jennifer L Hopp, Babitha Haridas, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Anto Bagíc, Joon-Yi Kang, Michael R Sperling, Niravkumar Barot, Sridevi V Sarma, Khalil S Husari
{"title":"应用动态网络模型诊断正常间期脑电图癫痫。","authors":"Patrick Myers, Kristin M Gunnarsdottir, Adam Li, Vlad Razskazovskiy, Jeff Craley, Alana Chandler, Dale Wyeth, Edmund Wyeth, Kareem A Zaghloul, Sara K Inati, Jennifer L Hopp, Babitha Haridas, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Anto Bagíc, Joon-Yi Kang, Michael R Sperling, Niravkumar Barot, Sridevi V Sarma, Khalil S Husari","doi":"10.1002/ana.27168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Whereas a scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) is important for diagnosing epilepsy, a single routine EEG is limited in its diagnostic value. Only a small percentage of routine EEGs show interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and overall misdiagnosis rates of epilepsy are 20% to 30%. We aim to demonstrate how network properties in EEG recordings can be used to improve the speed and accuracy differentiating epilepsy from mimics, such as functional seizures - even in the absence of IEDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter study, we analyzed routine scalp EEGs from 218 patients with suspected epilepsy and normal initial EEGs. The patients' diagnoses were later confirmed based on an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) admission. About 46% ultimately being diagnosed with epilepsy and 54% with non-epileptic conditions. A logistic regression model was trained using spectral and network-derived EEG features to differentiate between epilepsy and non-epilepsy. Of the 218 patients, 90% were used for training and 10% were held out for testing. Within the training set, 10-fold cross validation was performed. The resulting tool was named \"EpiScalp.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EpiScalp achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.940, an accuracy of 0.904, a sensitivity of 0.835, and a specificity of 0.963 in classifying patients as having epilepsy or not.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>EpiScalp provides an accurate diagnostic aid from a single initial EEG recording, even in more challenging epilepsy cases with normal initial EEGs. This may represent a paradigm shift in epilepsy diagnosis by deriving an objective measure of epilepsy likelihood from previously uninformative EEGs. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing Epilepsy with Normal Interictal EEG Using Dynamic Network Models.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Myers, Kristin M Gunnarsdottir, Adam Li, Vlad Razskazovskiy, Jeff Craley, Alana Chandler, Dale Wyeth, Edmund Wyeth, Kareem A Zaghloul, Sara K Inati, Jennifer L Hopp, Babitha Haridas, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Anto Bagíc, Joon-Yi Kang, Michael R Sperling, Niravkumar Barot, Sridevi V Sarma, Khalil S Husari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ana.27168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Whereas a scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) is important for diagnosing epilepsy, a single routine EEG is limited in its diagnostic value. Only a small percentage of routine EEGs show interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and overall misdiagnosis rates of epilepsy are 20% to 30%. We aim to demonstrate how network properties in EEG recordings can be used to improve the speed and accuracy differentiating epilepsy from mimics, such as functional seizures - even in the absence of IEDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter study, we analyzed routine scalp EEGs from 218 patients with suspected epilepsy and normal initial EEGs. The patients' diagnoses were later confirmed based on an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) admission. About 46% ultimately being diagnosed with epilepsy and 54% with non-epileptic conditions. A logistic regression model was trained using spectral and network-derived EEG features to differentiate between epilepsy and non-epilepsy. Of the 218 patients, 90% were used for training and 10% were held out for testing. Within the training set, 10-fold cross validation was performed. The resulting tool was named \\\"EpiScalp.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EpiScalp achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.940, an accuracy of 0.904, a sensitivity of 0.835, and a specificity of 0.963 in classifying patients as having epilepsy or not.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>EpiScalp provides an accurate diagnostic aid from a single initial EEG recording, even in more challenging epilepsy cases with normal initial EEGs. This may represent a paradigm shift in epilepsy diagnosis by deriving an objective measure of epilepsy likelihood from previously uninformative EEGs. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27168\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然头皮脑电图(EEG)对癫痫的诊断很重要,但单一常规脑电图的诊断价值有限。只有一小部分常规脑电图显示间歇癫痫样放电(IEDs),癫痫的总体误诊率为20%至30%。我们的目标是展示如何使用脑电图记录中的网络特性来提高区分癫痫与模仿的速度和准确性,例如功能性癫痫发作-即使在没有ied的情况下。方法:在这项多中心研究中,我们分析了218例疑似癫痫患者的常规头皮脑电图和正常的初始脑电图。患者的诊断后来在癫痫监测单位(EMU)入院的基础上得到证实。大约46%的人最终被诊断患有癫痫,54%的人患有非癫痫性疾病。使用频谱和网络衍生的脑电图特征训练逻辑回归模型来区分癫痫和非癫痫。在218名患者中,90%用于培训,10%用于测试。在训练集中,进行10倍交叉验证。最终的工具被命名为“EpiScalp”。结果:EpiScalp诊断癫痫的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.940,准确率为0.904,灵敏度为0.835,特异性为0.963。解释:EpiScalp提供了一个准确的诊断援助,从单一的初始脑电图记录,甚至在更具有挑战性的癫痫病例正常的初始脑电图。这可能代表了癫痫诊断的范式转变,从以前没有信息的脑电图中得出癫痫可能性的客观测量。Ann neurol 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosing Epilepsy with Normal Interictal EEG Using Dynamic Network Models.

Objective: Whereas a scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) is important for diagnosing epilepsy, a single routine EEG is limited in its diagnostic value. Only a small percentage of routine EEGs show interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and overall misdiagnosis rates of epilepsy are 20% to 30%. We aim to demonstrate how network properties in EEG recordings can be used to improve the speed and accuracy differentiating epilepsy from mimics, such as functional seizures - even in the absence of IEDs.

Methods: In this multicenter study, we analyzed routine scalp EEGs from 218 patients with suspected epilepsy and normal initial EEGs. The patients' diagnoses were later confirmed based on an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) admission. About 46% ultimately being diagnosed with epilepsy and 54% with non-epileptic conditions. A logistic regression model was trained using spectral and network-derived EEG features to differentiate between epilepsy and non-epilepsy. Of the 218 patients, 90% were used for training and 10% were held out for testing. Within the training set, 10-fold cross validation was performed. The resulting tool was named "EpiScalp."

Results: EpiScalp achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.940, an accuracy of 0.904, a sensitivity of 0.835, and a specificity of 0.963 in classifying patients as having epilepsy or not.

Interpretation: EpiScalp provides an accurate diagnostic aid from a single initial EEG recording, even in more challenging epilepsy cases with normal initial EEGs. This may represent a paradigm shift in epilepsy diagnosis by deriving an objective measure of epilepsy likelihood from previously uninformative EEGs. ANN NEUROL 2025.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信