比较romosozumab与双膦酸盐在日本骨质疏松症患者的心血管安全性:一种新的用户,具有工具变量分析的主动比较设计

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ryoji Tominaga, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Ryosuke Ishii, Kakuya Niihata, Tetsuro Aita, Tadahisa Okuda, Sayaka Shimizu, Masataka Taguri, Noriaki Kurita
{"title":"比较romosozumab与双膦酸盐在日本骨质疏松症患者的心血管安全性:一种新的用户,具有工具变量分析的主动比较设计","authors":"Ryoji Tominaga, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Ryosuke Ishii, Kakuya Niihata, Tetsuro Aita, Tadahisa Okuda, Sayaka Shimizu, Masataka Taguri, Noriaki Kurita","doi":"10.1093/jbmr/zjaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyzed the association of romosozumab, a human monoclonal antibody with bone-forming and bone resorption-inhibiting effects, and bisphosphonates with the development of cardiovascular disease among patients with osteoporosis. A new-user design was employed to address selection bias, and instrumental variable analysis was used to address confounding by indication. Japanese patients aged ≥40 years, diagnosed with osteoporosis or experienced a fragility fracture, were admitted to medical facilities covered by a commercial administrative claims database, and newly prescribed romosozumab or bisphosphonates after the commercialization of romosozumab in Japan (March 4, 2019) were included based on verification of a 180-day washout period. Cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction or stroke) was identified based on information regarding diagnosis, medical procedures, and drug codes. Facility-level prescription preference for romosozumab was used as an instrumental variable, defined as the proportion of romosozumab prescribed at the patient's facility within 90 days prior to the index date. Of the 59 694 included prescriptions, 8808 were for romosozumab and 50 886 were for bisphosphonates. The mean age in the romosozumab group was higher than that in the bisphosphonates group (80.5 vs. 78.2 years, respectively), and most patients were females (85.3 vs. 80.2%, respectively). The incidence of cardiovascular disease within 1 year of prescription was 12.3 per 100 person-years for romosozumab versus 11.4 for bisphosphonates (unadjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.18). An instrumental variable analysis using the two-stage residual inclusion method yielded a hazard ratio of 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.90) for romosozumab compared with bisphosphonates over 1 year. Although possibly underpowered, this study showed that no definitive evidence of increased cardiovascular risk associated with romosozumab use compared with bisphosphonates was observed in patients with osteoporosis. These findings should be further validated by larger pharmacoepidemiological studies to alleviate clinicians' concerns about romosozumab's safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative cardiovascular safety of romosozumab versus bisphosphonates in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: a new-user, active comparator design with instrumental variable analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Ryoji Tominaga, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Ryosuke Ishii, Kakuya Niihata, Tetsuro Aita, Tadahisa Okuda, Sayaka Shimizu, Masataka Taguri, Noriaki Kurita\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmr/zjaf010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study analyzed the association of romosozumab, a human monoclonal antibody with bone-forming and bone resorption-inhibiting effects, and bisphosphonates with the development of cardiovascular disease among patients with osteoporosis. A new-user design was employed to address selection bias, and instrumental variable analysis was used to address confounding by indication. Japanese patients aged ≥40 years, diagnosed with osteoporosis or experienced a fragility fracture, were admitted to medical facilities covered by a commercial administrative claims database, and newly prescribed romosozumab or bisphosphonates after the commercialization of romosozumab in Japan (March 4, 2019) were included based on verification of a 180-day washout period. Cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction or stroke) was identified based on information regarding diagnosis, medical procedures, and drug codes. Facility-level prescription preference for romosozumab was used as an instrumental variable, defined as the proportion of romosozumab prescribed at the patient's facility within 90 days prior to the index date. Of the 59 694 included prescriptions, 8808 were for romosozumab and 50 886 were for bisphosphonates. The mean age in the romosozumab group was higher than that in the bisphosphonates group (80.5 vs. 78.2 years, respectively), and most patients were females (85.3 vs. 80.2%, respectively). The incidence of cardiovascular disease within 1 year of prescription was 12.3 per 100 person-years for romosozumab versus 11.4 for bisphosphonates (unadjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.18). An instrumental variable analysis using the two-stage residual inclusion method yielded a hazard ratio of 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.90) for romosozumab compared with bisphosphonates over 1 year. Although possibly underpowered, this study showed that no definitive evidence of increased cardiovascular risk associated with romosozumab use compared with bisphosphonates was observed in patients with osteoporosis. These findings should be further validated by larger pharmacoepidemiological studies to alleviate clinicians' concerns about romosozumab's safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjaf010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjaf010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了romosozumab(一种具有骨形成和骨吸收抑制作用的人单克隆抗体)和双膦酸盐与骨质疏松症患者心血管疾病发展的关系。采用新用户设计来解决选择偏差,并使用工具变量分析来解决指征混淆。年龄≥40岁、被诊断患有骨质疏松症或经历过脆性骨折的日本患者被送入商业行政索赔数据库涵盖的医疗机构,在romosozumab在日本商业化(2019年3月4日)后新开的romosozumab或双膦酸盐被纳入,基于180天洗脱期的验证。心血管疾病(心肌梗死或中风)是根据诊断信息、医疗程序和药物代码确定的。机构级别处方对罗莫索单抗的偏好被用作工具变量,定义为在指标日期前90天内在患者机构开处方的罗莫索单抗的比例。在纳入的59694张处方中,8808张是romosozumab, 50886张是双膦酸盐。romosozumab组的平均年龄高于双膦酸盐组(分别为80.5岁和78.2岁),且大多数患者为女性(分别为85.3岁和80.2%)。处方1年内心血管疾病的发病率为romosozumab每100人年12.3例,而双膦酸盐为11.4例(未调整的发病率比:1.08,95%可信区间:1.00-1.18)。使用两阶段残留纳入法的工具变量分析显示,1年内romosozumab与双膦酸盐相比的风险比为1.30(95%置信区间:0.88-1.90)。虽然可能不够有力,但这项研究表明,与双膦酸盐相比,在骨质疏松症患者中,没有观察到使用romosozumab增加心血管风险的明确证据。这些发现应该通过更大规模的药物流行病学研究来进一步验证,以减轻临床医生对romosozumab安全性的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative cardiovascular safety of romosozumab versus bisphosphonates in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: a new-user, active comparator design with instrumental variable analyses.

This study analyzed the association of romosozumab, a human monoclonal antibody with bone-forming and bone resorption-inhibiting effects, and bisphosphonates with the development of cardiovascular disease among patients with osteoporosis. A new-user design was employed to address selection bias, and instrumental variable analysis was used to address confounding by indication. Japanese patients aged ≥40 years, diagnosed with osteoporosis or experienced a fragility fracture, were admitted to medical facilities covered by a commercial administrative claims database, and newly prescribed romosozumab or bisphosphonates after the commercialization of romosozumab in Japan (March 4, 2019) were included based on verification of a 180-day washout period. Cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction or stroke) was identified based on information regarding diagnosis, medical procedures, and drug codes. Facility-level prescription preference for romosozumab was used as an instrumental variable, defined as the proportion of romosozumab prescribed at the patient's facility within 90 days prior to the index date. Of the 59 694 included prescriptions, 8808 were for romosozumab and 50 886 were for bisphosphonates. The mean age in the romosozumab group was higher than that in the bisphosphonates group (80.5 vs. 78.2 years, respectively), and most patients were females (85.3 vs. 80.2%, respectively). The incidence of cardiovascular disease within 1 year of prescription was 12.3 per 100 person-years for romosozumab versus 11.4 for bisphosphonates (unadjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.18). An instrumental variable analysis using the two-stage residual inclusion method yielded a hazard ratio of 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.90) for romosozumab compared with bisphosphonates over 1 year. Although possibly underpowered, this study showed that no definitive evidence of increased cardiovascular risk associated with romosozumab use compared with bisphosphonates was observed in patients with osteoporosis. These findings should be further validated by larger pharmacoepidemiological studies to alleviate clinicians' concerns about romosozumab's safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信