高频应用中面积相关电容式加速度计与气隙相关电容式加速度计各参数性能比较

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
P. Balakrishna, Joseph Daniel Rathanasami, Y. V. Narayana
{"title":"高频应用中面积相关电容式加速度计与气隙相关电容式加速度计各参数性能比较","authors":"P. Balakrishna,&nbsp;Joseph Daniel Rathanasami,&nbsp;Y. V. Narayana","doi":"10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microelectronics and mechanical system (MEMS) capacitive accelerometers are very much required for high frequency applications like weapons navigation, submarine navigation and many more. Here, authors design MEMS capacitive accelerometers and also compare their performances. The bulk micro machined multiple beams area changed capacitance accelerometer and air gap comb drive capacitive accelerometer structures are designed. Generally in capacitive accelerometers due to high gap between parallel plates linearity is high and sensitivity is low and vice versa. It is not possible for achieving high linearity and sensitivity at a time. Here, authors concentrated to achieve high mechanical sensitivity and high voltage sensitivity with better linearity for capacitive Accelerometers. So authors performed some analysis like non-linearity, capacitive, noise, temperature, displacement and voltage sensitivity in various works for both the capacitive accelerometers and compared<b>.</b> The cross axis sensitivity for air gap is 10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 <span>\\(\\frac{ug}{{\\sqrt {{\\text{hz}}} }}\\)</span> and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/<span>\\(\\sqrt {{\\text{Hz}}}\\)</span>, Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7827,"journal":{"name":"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing","volume":"122 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison on various parameters of area dependent capacitive accelerometer and air gap dependent capacitive accelerometer for high frequency applications\",\"authors\":\"P. Balakrishna,&nbsp;Joseph Daniel Rathanasami,&nbsp;Y. V. Narayana\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Microelectronics and mechanical system (MEMS) capacitive accelerometers are very much required for high frequency applications like weapons navigation, submarine navigation and many more. Here, authors design MEMS capacitive accelerometers and also compare their performances. The bulk micro machined multiple beams area changed capacitance accelerometer and air gap comb drive capacitive accelerometer structures are designed. Generally in capacitive accelerometers due to high gap between parallel plates linearity is high and sensitivity is low and vice versa. It is not possible for achieving high linearity and sensitivity at a time. Here, authors concentrated to achieve high mechanical sensitivity and high voltage sensitivity with better linearity for capacitive Accelerometers. So authors performed some analysis like non-linearity, capacitive, noise, temperature, displacement and voltage sensitivity in various works for both the capacitive accelerometers and compared<b>.</b> The cross axis sensitivity for air gap is 10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{ug}{{\\\\sqrt {{\\\\text{hz}}} }}\\\\)</span> and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/<span>\\\\(\\\\sqrt {{\\\\text{Hz}}}\\\\)</span>, Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"122 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微电子和机械系统(MEMS)电容式加速度计非常需要高频应用,如武器导航,潜艇导航等等。本文设计了MEMS电容式加速度计,并对其性能进行了比较。设计了本体微加工多波束变面积电容式加速度计和气隙梳状驱动电容式加速度计结构。一般电容式加速度计由于平行板间隙大,线性度高,灵敏度低,反之亦然。它不可能一次获得高的线性度和灵敏度。本文主要研究电容式加速度计的高机械灵敏度和高电压灵敏度以及良好的线性度。为此,作者对两种电容式加速度计的非线性、电容性、噪声、温度、位移和电压敏感性进行了分析,并对其进行了比较。气隙的交叉轴灵敏度为10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 \(\frac{ug}{{\sqrt {{\text{hz}}} }}\) and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/\(\sqrt {{\text{Hz}}}\), Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance comparison on various parameters of area dependent capacitive accelerometer and air gap dependent capacitive accelerometer for high frequency applications

Performance comparison on various parameters of area dependent capacitive accelerometer and air gap dependent capacitive accelerometer for high frequency applications

Microelectronics and mechanical system (MEMS) capacitive accelerometers are very much required for high frequency applications like weapons navigation, submarine navigation and many more. Here, authors design MEMS capacitive accelerometers and also compare their performances. The bulk micro machined multiple beams area changed capacitance accelerometer and air gap comb drive capacitive accelerometer structures are designed. Generally in capacitive accelerometers due to high gap between parallel plates linearity is high and sensitivity is low and vice versa. It is not possible for achieving high linearity and sensitivity at a time. Here, authors concentrated to achieve high mechanical sensitivity and high voltage sensitivity with better linearity for capacitive Accelerometers. So authors performed some analysis like non-linearity, capacitive, noise, temperature, displacement and voltage sensitivity in various works for both the capacitive accelerometers and compared. The cross axis sensitivity for air gap is 10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 \(\frac{ug}{{\sqrt {{\text{hz}}} }}\) and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/\(\sqrt {{\text{Hz}}}\), Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing is an archival peer reviewed journal dedicated to the design and application of analog, radio frequency (RF), and mixed signal integrated circuits (ICs) as well as signal processing circuits and systems. It features both new research results and tutorial views and reflects the large volume of cutting-edge research activity in the worldwide field today. A partial list of topics includes analog and mixed signal interface circuits and systems; analog and RFIC design; data converters; active-RC, switched-capacitor, and continuous-time integrated filters; mixed analog/digital VLSI systems; wireless radio transceivers; clock and data recovery circuits; and high speed optoelectronic circuits and systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信