P. Balakrishna, Joseph Daniel Rathanasami, Y. V. Narayana
{"title":"高频应用中面积相关电容式加速度计与气隙相关电容式加速度计各参数性能比较","authors":"P. Balakrishna, Joseph Daniel Rathanasami, Y. V. Narayana","doi":"10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microelectronics and mechanical system (MEMS) capacitive accelerometers are very much required for high frequency applications like weapons navigation, submarine navigation and many more. Here, authors design MEMS capacitive accelerometers and also compare their performances. The bulk micro machined multiple beams area changed capacitance accelerometer and air gap comb drive capacitive accelerometer structures are designed. Generally in capacitive accelerometers due to high gap between parallel plates linearity is high and sensitivity is low and vice versa. It is not possible for achieving high linearity and sensitivity at a time. Here, authors concentrated to achieve high mechanical sensitivity and high voltage sensitivity with better linearity for capacitive Accelerometers. So authors performed some analysis like non-linearity, capacitive, noise, temperature, displacement and voltage sensitivity in various works for both the capacitive accelerometers and compared<b>.</b> The cross axis sensitivity for air gap is 10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 <span>\\(\\frac{ug}{{\\sqrt {{\\text{hz}}} }}\\)</span> and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/<span>\\(\\sqrt {{\\text{Hz}}}\\)</span>, Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7827,"journal":{"name":"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing","volume":"122 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison on various parameters of area dependent capacitive accelerometer and air gap dependent capacitive accelerometer for high frequency applications\",\"authors\":\"P. Balakrishna, Joseph Daniel Rathanasami, Y. V. Narayana\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Microelectronics and mechanical system (MEMS) capacitive accelerometers are very much required for high frequency applications like weapons navigation, submarine navigation and many more. Here, authors design MEMS capacitive accelerometers and also compare their performances. The bulk micro machined multiple beams area changed capacitance accelerometer and air gap comb drive capacitive accelerometer structures are designed. Generally in capacitive accelerometers due to high gap between parallel plates linearity is high and sensitivity is low and vice versa. It is not possible for achieving high linearity and sensitivity at a time. Here, authors concentrated to achieve high mechanical sensitivity and high voltage sensitivity with better linearity for capacitive Accelerometers. So authors performed some analysis like non-linearity, capacitive, noise, temperature, displacement and voltage sensitivity in various works for both the capacitive accelerometers and compared<b>.</b> The cross axis sensitivity for air gap is 10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{ug}{{\\\\sqrt {{\\\\text{hz}}} }}\\\\)</span> and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/<span>\\\\(\\\\sqrt {{\\\\text{Hz}}}\\\\)</span>, Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"122 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10470-025-02303-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
微电子和机械系统(MEMS)电容式加速度计非常需要高频应用,如武器导航,潜艇导航等等。本文设计了MEMS电容式加速度计,并对其性能进行了比较。设计了本体微加工多波束变面积电容式加速度计和气隙梳状驱动电容式加速度计结构。一般电容式加速度计由于平行板间隙大,线性度高,灵敏度低,反之亦然。它不可能一次获得高的线性度和灵敏度。本文主要研究电容式加速度计的高机械灵敏度和高电压灵敏度以及良好的线性度。为此,作者对两种电容式加速度计的非线性、电容性、噪声、温度、位移和电压敏感性进行了分析,并对其进行了比较。气隙的交叉轴灵敏度为10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 \(\frac{ug}{{\sqrt {{\text{hz}}} }}\) and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/\(\sqrt {{\text{Hz}}}\), Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.
Performance comparison on various parameters of area dependent capacitive accelerometer and air gap dependent capacitive accelerometer for high frequency applications
Microelectronics and mechanical system (MEMS) capacitive accelerometers are very much required for high frequency applications like weapons navigation, submarine navigation and many more. Here, authors design MEMS capacitive accelerometers and also compare their performances. The bulk micro machined multiple beams area changed capacitance accelerometer and air gap comb drive capacitive accelerometer structures are designed. Generally in capacitive accelerometers due to high gap between parallel plates linearity is high and sensitivity is low and vice versa. It is not possible for achieving high linearity and sensitivity at a time. Here, authors concentrated to achieve high mechanical sensitivity and high voltage sensitivity with better linearity for capacitive Accelerometers. So authors performed some analysis like non-linearity, capacitive, noise, temperature, displacement and voltage sensitivity in various works for both the capacitive accelerometers and compared. The cross axis sensitivity for air gap is 10.75% and for area is 0.45%, voltage sensitivity for air is 0.3642 V/g and for area is 0.8466 V/g. Noise figure for air is 0.428 \(\frac{ug}{{\sqrt {{\text{hz}}} }}\) and noise figure for area is 3.73 pg/\(\sqrt {{\text{Hz}}}\), Mechanical sensitivity for air is 0.007 µm/g and for area is 0.26 µm/g and linearity is nearly equal to both the capacitive accelerometers. From all these comparisons authors concluded that area changed capacitive accelerometer is best one when compared to air gap changed accelerometer. The primary advantage of this structure is that no changes to the fabrication process flow are required when constructing it.
期刊介绍:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing is an archival peer reviewed journal dedicated to the design and application of analog, radio frequency (RF), and mixed signal integrated circuits (ICs) as well as signal processing circuits and systems. It features both new research results and tutorial views and reflects the large volume of cutting-edge research activity in the worldwide field today.
A partial list of topics includes analog and mixed signal interface circuits and systems; analog and RFIC design; data converters; active-RC, switched-capacitor, and continuous-time integrated filters; mixed analog/digital VLSI systems; wireless radio transceivers; clock and data recovery circuits; and high speed optoelectronic circuits and systems.