钢筋混凝土和后张板柱连接的地震易损性评估。基于可靠度的楼层漂移限制公式

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Aikaterini S. Genikomsou, Ahmed M. Abdelmaksoud, Georgios P. Balomenos
{"title":"钢筋混凝土和后张板柱连接的地震易损性评估。基于可靠度的楼层漂移限制公式","authors":"Aikaterini S. Genikomsou,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Abdelmaksoud,&nbsp;Georgios P. Balomenos","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02019-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many design codes, such as ACI 318−19, ACI 352.1R-11 and ASCE 41−17, offer deterministic inter-storey drift limit functions of the gravity shear ratios for flat slab floor systems acting as the primary lateral load-resisting system. However, such deterministic limits are not capable of capturing the inherent aleatory uncertainty in the damage capacities of slab-column connections, inducing unknown failure risks during seismic events. To address this, seismic fragility analysis is conducted to generate fragility curves relating the probability of a connection exceeding a performance level or damage state to the inter-story drift ratio and gravity shear ratio. The developed fragility curves are based on an updated experimental database of 221 interior reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections without and with shear reinforcement under combined gravity and lateral loadings. Two damage states are introduced, yielding and failure due to punching shear or flexure. The developed fragility curves are used as basis for generating reliability-based formulations and charts to aid designers in determining the drift limits as a function of the design gravity shear ratio as well as a chosen reliability index. The analysis showed that connections with continuous bottom reinforcement, shear reinforcement, or prestressing have enhanced drift capacities and reliability. Also, higher gravity shear ratios significantly lower the limit drift ratio of both reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections without shear reinforcement at a given reliability index value. Comparing the proposed reliability-based drift limits to the deterministic limits in ACI 318−19, ACI 352.1R-11 and ASCE 41−17 revealed that the code limits tend to correspond to a reliability index ranging from about 0 to 2.5 for connections without shear reinforcement; and 3 to 8 for connections with shear reinforcement. The existing design limits for slab-column connections without shear reinforcement are least reliable at high gravity shear ratios with reliability index generally below 1.25. These results signify that the proposed reliability-based limits can prompt more informed risk-based designs, especially for connections without shear reinforcement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"241 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic fragility assessment of reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections - reliability-based formulations for storey drift limits\",\"authors\":\"Aikaterini S. Genikomsou,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Abdelmaksoud,&nbsp;Georgios P. Balomenos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-02019-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many design codes, such as ACI 318−19, ACI 352.1R-11 and ASCE 41−17, offer deterministic inter-storey drift limit functions of the gravity shear ratios for flat slab floor systems acting as the primary lateral load-resisting system. However, such deterministic limits are not capable of capturing the inherent aleatory uncertainty in the damage capacities of slab-column connections, inducing unknown failure risks during seismic events. To address this, seismic fragility analysis is conducted to generate fragility curves relating the probability of a connection exceeding a performance level or damage state to the inter-story drift ratio and gravity shear ratio. The developed fragility curves are based on an updated experimental database of 221 interior reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections without and with shear reinforcement under combined gravity and lateral loadings. Two damage states are introduced, yielding and failure due to punching shear or flexure. The developed fragility curves are used as basis for generating reliability-based formulations and charts to aid designers in determining the drift limits as a function of the design gravity shear ratio as well as a chosen reliability index. The analysis showed that connections with continuous bottom reinforcement, shear reinforcement, or prestressing have enhanced drift capacities and reliability. Also, higher gravity shear ratios significantly lower the limit drift ratio of both reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections without shear reinforcement at a given reliability index value. Comparing the proposed reliability-based drift limits to the deterministic limits in ACI 318−19, ACI 352.1R-11 and ASCE 41−17 revealed that the code limits tend to correspond to a reliability index ranging from about 0 to 2.5 for connections without shear reinforcement; and 3 to 8 for connections with shear reinforcement. The existing design limits for slab-column connections without shear reinforcement are least reliable at high gravity shear ratios with reliability index generally below 1.25. These results signify that the proposed reliability-based limits can prompt more informed risk-based designs, especially for connections without shear reinforcement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02019-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02019-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多设计规范,如ACI 318−19,ACI 352.1R-11和ASCE 41−17,为作为主要横向抗荷载系统的平板楼盖系统提供了确定的层间位移极限函数。然而,这种确定性限制无法捕捉板-柱连接损伤能力的固有不确定性,从而在地震事件中产生未知的破坏风险。为了解决这个问题,进行了地震易损性分析,生成了连接超过性能水平或破坏状态的概率与层间位移比和重力剪切比的易损性曲线。开发的脆性曲线是基于更新的试验数据库,该数据库包含221个内部钢筋混凝土和后张板-柱连接,在重力和侧向联合荷载作用下,不加剪力钢筋和加剪力钢筋。介绍了两种破坏状态:屈服和冲孔剪切或弯曲破坏。所开发的易损性曲线可作为生成基于可靠性的公式和图表的基础,以帮助设计人员确定作为设计重力剪切比的漂移极限以及所选择的可靠性指标。分析表明,底部连续加筋、剪力加筋或预应力连接均能提高其漂移能力和可靠性。在一定的可靠指标值下,较高的重力剪力比显著降低了钢筋混凝土和无剪力加固后张板-柱连接的极限漂移比。将提出的基于可靠度的漂移极限与ACI 318 ~ 19、ACI 352.1R-11和ASCE 41 ~ 17的确定性极限进行比较,发现对于无剪切加固的连接,规范极限倾向于对应于0 ~ 2.5的可靠度指标;带剪力钢筋的连接为3 ~ 8。现有无抗剪配筋板柱连接设计极限在高重剪比下可靠性最差,可靠度指标一般低于1.25。这些结果表明,建议的基于可靠性的限制可以促进更明智的基于风险的设计,特别是对于没有剪切加固的连接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Seismic fragility assessment of reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections - reliability-based formulations for storey drift limits

Seismic fragility assessment of reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections - reliability-based formulations for storey drift limits

Many design codes, such as ACI 318−19, ACI 352.1R-11 and ASCE 41−17, offer deterministic inter-storey drift limit functions of the gravity shear ratios for flat slab floor systems acting as the primary lateral load-resisting system. However, such deterministic limits are not capable of capturing the inherent aleatory uncertainty in the damage capacities of slab-column connections, inducing unknown failure risks during seismic events. To address this, seismic fragility analysis is conducted to generate fragility curves relating the probability of a connection exceeding a performance level or damage state to the inter-story drift ratio and gravity shear ratio. The developed fragility curves are based on an updated experimental database of 221 interior reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections without and with shear reinforcement under combined gravity and lateral loadings. Two damage states are introduced, yielding and failure due to punching shear or flexure. The developed fragility curves are used as basis for generating reliability-based formulations and charts to aid designers in determining the drift limits as a function of the design gravity shear ratio as well as a chosen reliability index. The analysis showed that connections with continuous bottom reinforcement, shear reinforcement, or prestressing have enhanced drift capacities and reliability. Also, higher gravity shear ratios significantly lower the limit drift ratio of both reinforced concrete and post-tensioned slab-column connections without shear reinforcement at a given reliability index value. Comparing the proposed reliability-based drift limits to the deterministic limits in ACI 318−19, ACI 352.1R-11 and ASCE 41−17 revealed that the code limits tend to correspond to a reliability index ranging from about 0 to 2.5 for connections without shear reinforcement; and 3 to 8 for connections with shear reinforcement. The existing design limits for slab-column connections without shear reinforcement are least reliable at high gravity shear ratios with reliability index generally below 1.25. These results signify that the proposed reliability-based limits can prompt more informed risk-based designs, especially for connections without shear reinforcement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信